Frank wrote on Sep 29
th, 2023 at 11:19am:
...As I said, there is lots of evidence but atheists accept only a certain class of evidence - empirical - and not others.
But accepting only empirical evidence for something super-natural, ie 'super-empirical', is pathological from beginning to end.
Of course atheists only accept empirical evidence.
There's absolutely no point of accepting claims that
are made without any supporting empirical evidence at
all—such as the claims that God or gods exist.
I could claim that unicorns actually exist, and have an
expectation that you'd accept this at face value. Which
would obviously be an absurd expectation—unless I
provided you with empirical evidence in its support.
And unless I did that, you'd be quite within your rights
to call me an idiot. The first thing you'd (rightly) ask
of me would be for some sort of proof, such as photographs.
Can you tell me of one piece of evidence, of any degree,
that could prove the existence of God?
Only one, single
piece of viable evidence that would stand up to scientific
scrutiny?
Nope: you can't. QED.