Linus
Senior Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 471
Gender:
|
Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 9:40pm: Linus wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 9:32pm: Frank wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 9:27pm: Linus wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 9:11pm: Frank wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 9:10pm: Linus wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 7:10pm: Frank wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 7:08pm: Linus wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 6:57pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 2:34pm: Bobby. wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 2:22pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 2:19pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 2:18pm: Lisa Jones wrote on Sep 28 th, 2023 at 1:07pm: Even so they (atheists) can’t provide a shred of evidence that God doesn’t exist. Look at this topic for a clue.
How do you prove god doesn't exist? That’s a problem for Atheists to sort out. Actually lisa, don't fall for that one - you can't disprove a negative - example - prove that there's not a Leprechaun at the bottom of my garden. You can prove, say, that there's no cockroach in your coffee cup. If it's a Theistic cockroach, you can't. Oh, ok, I'll go further, you can't prove there's no cockroach in your coffee cup. A Theist will pop up and say the cockroach in your cup invisible and doesn't interact with matter. S(he) may even argue that it's there but you've hardened your eyeballs to it and therefore you can't see it. And it doesn't have to be a Theist, it could be a Booby. That is just too stupid. You are not a representative of atheism or anything else but inchoate idiocy. What's your argument against it? The point is that you can't prove a negative. That is an idiotic, stupid, mindless, moronic thing to say. Empty, stupid glibness. You are not a cockroach. Gregor K wasn't a cockroach. The moon is not made of cheese. There are NO snakes in Antarctica, nor bees. There is no 30th of February. In what universe? What a stupid question. How many do you know of? Ever hear of Everett universes? Ever hear that most scientists don’t believe/trust/agree with Everett’s ideas ? I haven't seen a poll. Yes, this is still controversial. At least some do think Everett universes are a viable interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Even in this universe, Frank's criticism would be struggling. It can always be evaded.
|