Frank wrote on Oct 11
th, 2023 at 8:43pm:
An anthropomorphic god is too obviously a metaphor. You can't take it literally.
There is a lot of wisdom in religious teachings, as there is in literature, art and other imaginative human engagements with questions of meaning. Taking transcendent things literally, not noticing that we only have language, based on sensory experience, to talk about non-sensory aspects of our lives as if they were just like sensory experiences, is the trap both atheists and biblical literalist fall into and they are battling over nonsense.
Ah, so you DID respond, though not to my post specifically ( ...too difficult?)
Let's take a a closer look:
"An anthropomorphic god is too obviously a metaphor. You can't take it literally." You and I can't, but politically powerful RW Christian Conservatives certainly DO take it seriously, see Pompeo's widely held theories on 'the rapture' and 'Armageddon'.
As for your next paragraph, we are in furious agreement, so when will you stop supporting biblical literalists' claims (eg "the Promised Land") on the WB?
Such claims cost PM Rabin his life (Rabin's murderer was a Jewish OT nut-job), and are a fundamental cause of the current mayhem; the 2-state solution is - in the course of decades - slowly disappearing before our eyes, as the IDF defends illegal settler OT nut-jobs.