MeisterEckhart wrote on Oct 24
th, 2023 at 9:13am:
The dopaminergic response is about anticipating positive outcomes to be realised in the future, and religious practice can augment the likelihood of that response, as can other repetitive or ritualistic practises.
Atheists are not necessarily immune to magical thinking evoked by dopamine, such that when a good thing happens to us, we're hard-wired to take into account a myriad of things that happened, or what we were doing at the time, or what physiological/psychological state we were in immediately prior to the good thing happening.
Oh no, there is no difference, we're all human. We have the same responses to dopamine, some more than others, but faith or lack there of doesn't really play a part.
Quote:Similarly, atheists are not necessarily immune from 'touching wood' or wearing a lucky charm to avoid or avert bad future outcomes - again, we're hard-wired to intuit our agency against plain, random bad luck.
It's not for no reason that, as traditional religions decline in influence, quasi-, pseudo-, or new religions have grown in influence - e.g. New Age, spiritualism, crystallogy, 'the universe providing', 'Western Buddhism' &etc.
The point was more that we all are on the path of being controlled by our biological urges. Until the idea of a god is indoctrinated in someone, be they young or old, the path they walk before that is very similar to atheism.
It's not like they only start wanting answers once a holy text can provide them.
The difference is the choice to accept those answers using faith as evidence and straying from the default path, or not.