chimera wrote on Oct 1^st, 2023 at 7:56pm:

No. You're the stupid one LTYC. 

aquascoot wrote on Oct 1^st, 2023 at 8:57pm:


No, it shows that your Dear Leader didn't have his hand on the wheel.

Or did he?

That's a question.

[quoquote author=Karnal link=1696092379/7#7 date=1696140616]aquascoot wrote on Oct 1^st, 2023 at 1:08pm:


Beware the one in whom, dear.

[

He's our law and order president, no? [/quote]

Well, those looters are not responding to, "er.... excuse I, Mattyfisk is the name....that is not yours, you can't just take it without paying".
The cops are not arresting them, not enough cops to kneel on all their necks, store security is as useless as you - so what to do?

"ramped up emphasis on punishment"    not enough social workers to hold their hands, either, and purr, 'there, there, we know you are looting designer shoes and bags and cosmetics to feed your obese family". 

Shoot them. Hangings too good for 'em. 

[/quote]

Beware the one in whom the instinct to punish is strong, Aquascoot. Here's Frank, advocating the death penalty for theft.

And no, he hasn't converted to Islam. Under shariah law, thieves go on trial.

So how does the big fella, prez, overcome state murder laws, tort laws, civil liability and insurance policies to legalise the shooting of shoplifters?

And if you just say, oh he's just being a kidder, why is he running for prez? He's even been prez, so he knows what the limitations are. He's running for a job where he swears an oath to the rights of shoplifters to receive justice under the law.  He has to swear an oath to protect Nancy and her husband too.

So I'm curious. Do you believe he should terminate the constitution? [/quote]

incorrect.

there is a natural order to things.

when a strong man is in charge, the people behave.

when a frail decaying man is in charge, the people lose their compass.
people are desperate for boundaries (border walls but also boundaries on their own behaviour.)

when a weak sauce president panders to weirdos in drag going into womens toilets
when he gives illegal aliens i phones at the border
when he pulls out of afghanistan and gifts the taliban black hawks

people do all sorts of crazy things

they want that firm steady hand back on the wheel.

trump may just win this thing
de santis would be a certainty but president metamucil is repugnant to the human pysche
i cant see him winning

people will not vote for decay

[/quote]

So why were there so many rioters and looters when the big fella was in charge?

He even told a crowd to go peacefully to the Capitol and show the weak Republicans some strength, Remember? Somehow, they mistook his order as permission to assault police, bust into the chambers, smear shit on the walls, and storm around looking for

Four hours later, your Dear Leader called them very special people and said he loved them.

So no, a firm and steady hand ge was not, but you know that already, no? The day before yesterday you said how destructive he was. This was a good thing, you said. Yes, the more damage the big fella does to the presidency and the government, the better it is for business.

Business tends to differ, dear, but how do you square your call for anarchy only two days ago with your call for a steady hand on the tiller today?

Good grief, next you'll be endorsing Ron Desanctis. [/quote]


incorrect, they planned to take selfies with them  [/quote]

I see. So how was his strong man act during the Charleston riots?

There was an opportunity for a steady hand on the wheel, no? Thousands of tiki-torch carrying neo-Nazis defending their confederate statue. Along come the leftards to say enough enough. One of the big fella's followers drives into them, killing and injuring several people.

The big fella's asked what he thinks. Oh, he says, there's good and bad people on both sides. The Nazis go wild.

Steady hand on the wheel, eh? The FBI changed the terror threat that year. It was no longer foreign Islamicist terrorists. From 2018 on, it was far-right extremists.

What did the big fella do to reset their compass?
[/quote]


shows that the intelligence services are politicised [/quote]

No, it shows that your Dear Leader didn't have his hand on the wheel.

Or did he?

That's a question.
[/quote]


trump wouldnt suck up to the FBI and CIA.

they are used to controlling technology companies like google and manipulating the narrative.

so they announced trumps base as the number 1 threat despite the fact that the base didnt kill anyone

they (the FBI) infiltrated january 6 and urged on the protestors

this is well established

they lied that a security faurd had his head bashed in with a fire extinguisher

the protestors just took selfies and started no fires and did no damage

compare that to anti fa who set fire to numerous city halls and police buikdings all over the country during the BLM riots

Quote:


What IS being done by law enforcement to stop or punish looters?

If I was a shopkeeper and I saw that the police and courts did nothing, I would do something. Guards at banks have guns and shoot bank robbers.
If looters resisted lawful apprehension, I too would shoot to stop. That's not the 'death penalty', that's just a flesh wound.

Don't loot - IS that white supremacist instinct for punishment?

Donald's favourite charity, US of Trump, has agreed to pay the repairs to Nancy's Swamp-House if he gets advertising rights on the Speaker's Chair. She asked for bullet-proof glass which is bias and fake and anyway a hammer will do for the front door.

Is this suggesting that Mr D Trump is not superior? It's established. We've heard it from himself.  His wall is superior, Mr Pelosi's wall is inferior. Aquascoot knows.

Karnal wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2023 at 12:10pm:


incorrect,

biden doesnt work with intelligence agencies, he works for intelligence agencies