freediver wrote on Aug 23^rd, 2024 at 2:35pm:


Dear me...you are not able to distingish between a fact and an opinion?

Fact: The Jew said it might be justifiable to  starve Gaza;
I'm asking for your opinion: do you also think it might be justifiable?

Are you a coward, as well as mentally incompetent?





 

freediver wrote on Aug 24^th, 2024 at 6:40pm:


Dare to explain how I "changed my version".

Go on, have a shot....

The facts are clear, as reported (just google them for yourself); ie the Jew claimed it might be "morally justifiable" to starve Gazans.   

Of more concern here is the fact you are mentally incompetent, and a coward who refuses to give an opinion on what the Jew said.

Have a shot - do you think it's "morally justifiable"?
 

freediver wrote on Aug 26^th, 2024 at 9:38am:


No I didn't,  I reported what the press said, which you would know if you read the news reports. 

Quote:


No difference; the Jew said it might be justifiable to starve Gaza - a comment which has aroused the ire of the UN, the EU, and US.

And you are too cowardly to even defend what the Jew said.

Deplorable.

freediver wrote on Aug 28^th, 2024 at 11:21am:


Yes, and I corrected the former comment ages ago, while you have been refusing to defend the Jew's statement, which has been condemned by the UN, EU, and US. 

Quote:


Let's see how you try to save face while refusing to defend the Jew's statement.

thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 28^th, 2024 at 11:39am:


So you cannot see any difference between the two versions you provided, but you still describe the second one as a "corrected" version?

What would you say is more important in the internal culture of the CCP: honesty and telling the truth, or saving face?

Am I correct that you are yet to quote what the Jew actually said, and the closest you have come is a version that gets maybe 4 consecutive words correct? Is the problem that China does not allow you access to any of the websites in which Jews say what they actually said? Or do you just feel uncomfortable quoting a Jew directly?

freediver wrote on Aug 28^th, 2024 at 1:04pm:
 

Your low is IQ evident: by definition, a "corrected" version is different to an "uncorrected" version.

And the corrected version is the one  which caused universal condemnation  of the genocidal  Jew who made the statement.

Quote:


I would say it is evident it is more important for YOU to save face than tell the truth.

Or even have the competence to critique the genocidal Jew's statement.

Quote:


Incorrect; google for yourself what the Jew said which resulted in his universal condemnation

Quote:


An example of a conservtaie mind in full flight: before, you were were complaining about 5 words in quotes, and later you complained about my accurate paraphrase of his words "It might be moral to starve the Gazan population"

Quote:



No, the problem is your ideology-blinded mind which refuses to accept news reports from reputable outlets.

Quote:


Don't shoot the messenger, in this case the world's press: in fact I didn't hear the Jew myself, I read what he said in the press, as outlined above.


Your "fake news" routine won't wash here.

Laugh till you cry wrote on Aug 28^th, 2024 at 1:14pm:


Correct; in the present debate, FD is experimenting   with Trump's  "fake news" routine, despite the facts (re the genocide-defending Jew**) being related by multiple world media outlets. 

** "it might be moral to starve a population" (to get the hostages back), a view universally condemned by the UN, EU and US.