freediver wrote on Aug 31
st, 2024 at 6:08pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 29
th, 2024 at 12:44pm:
freediver wrote on Aug 28
th, 2024 at 1:04pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 28
th, 2024 at 11:39am:
freediver wrote on Aug 28
th, 2024 at 11:21am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Aug 28
th, 2024 at 11:09am:
freediver wrote on Aug 26
th, 2024 at 9:38am:
Quote:Dare to explain how I "changed my version".
You gave a different version of what the Jew said.
No I didn't
LOL.
You are really struggling here, aren't you?
TGD:
Yes, and today an Israeli fascist in Netanyauhu's cabinet said its permissible to starve two million Gazans.
and
TGD:
the Jew claimed it might be "morally justifiable" to starve Gazans.
Can you tell the difference yet?
Yes, and I corrected the former comment ages ago,
So you cannot see any difference between the two versions you provided, but you still describe the second one as a "corrected" version?
Your low is IQ evident: by definition, a "corrected" version is different to an "uncorrected" version.
And the corrected version is the one which caused universal condemnation of the genocidal Jew who made the statement.
Quote: What would you say is more important in the internal culture of the CCP: honesty and telling the truth, or saving face?
I would say it is evident it is more important for YOU to save face than tell the truth.
Or even have the competence to critique the genocidal Jew's statement.
Quote:Am I correct that you are yet to quote what the Jew actually said,
Incorrect; google for yourself what the Jew said which resulted in his universal condemnation
Quote: and the closest you have come is a version that gets maybe 4 consecutive words correct?
An example of a conservtaie mind in full flight: before, you were were complaining about 5 words in quotes, and later you complained about my accurate paraphrase of his words "It might be moral to starve the Gazan population"
Quote: Is the problem that China does not allow you access to any of the websites in which Jews say what they actually said?
No, the problem is your ideology-blinded mind which refuses to accept news reports from reputable outlets.
Quote: Or do you just feel uncomfortable quoting a Jew directly?
Don't shoot the messenger, in this case the world's press: in fact I didn't hear the Jew myself, I read what he said in the press, as outlined above.
Your "fake news" routine won't wash here.
When did you realise you could tell the difference between what you claimed the Jew said, and what the Jew actually said?
You dementing? I already told you ie right at the start of this exchange (and confirmed above).
Quote: Because I have asked you several times in this thread now, and you repeatedly denied there being any difference.
You are a liar, or a dementing fool, see above:
Yes, and I corrected the former comment ages ago,
ie soon after the start of this ridiculous exchange with you denying what the Jew said**, and lacking the integrity to critique what he said.
** or rather, you refusing to say what YOU think the Jew said, a typical Fraudiver method.
Quote:I am curious to know, because as far as I can tell this is the first time in recorded history that anyone has gotten through to you.
News flash: you haven't "gotten through to me", you are only exposing your own lying "fake news" routine.
The UN thinks the Jew is a war criminal; you?
Quote:While you are in the mood for being honest, do you also agree that you "changed your version" and "gave a different version" of what the Jew said?
!st part: yes, as already noted above - which you ignored.
2nd part; no, the Jew said planned mass starvation might be moral.
What's YOUR opinion - "might it be 'moral'"?
The UN has a message for you - it isn't 'moral'.
Stop being a coward; say yes or no, with an explanation - should be wonderful to behold.