|
Frank
|
Dnarever wrote on Nov 28 th, 2023 at 1:55pm: Frank wrote on Nov 19 th, 2023 at 4:07pm: Dnarever wrote on Nov 7 th, 2023 at 6:55pm: Frank wrote on Nov 6 th, 2023 at 8:13pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 6 th, 2023 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Nov 6 th, 2023 at 7:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 6 th, 2023 at 10:27am: The same old excuses from the right:
- "They started it."
- "Yeah, but they kill kids too."
Childish nonsense.
There is no justification for the mass slaughter of children - Hamas and the IDF are both guilty of horrendous war crimes and both need to be stopped. It takes a completely amoral, despicable shite like you, despicable creepy, repellent turd, to equate putting children in harm's way with attacking unsuspecting innocents. You are parading the worst, most despicable kind of lying propaganda and of course that is what you always do. You don't care about anything other than being offensive and despicable. That is ALL you are ever drawn to. You condone, and encourage, the slaughter of innocent children. I'm pretty sure I'm on the higher ground here, buddy  Not at all, despicable, stinking creep. You ignore, on purpose, 7 October. No he is right - you should get this after taking the low road for decades. It isn't difficult to get the Hamas killing Israeli children is horrendous just as Israelis killing thousands more Palestinian children is horrendous. Both sides are responsible for war crimes both should be punished. None of this is justified or excusable. The fourth Geneva Convention (1949) deals with the protection of civilians during armed conflict. Its prohibitions cover both state and non-state actors, but the world has yet to figure out how to enforce them on the latter. This has created a de facto imbalance that is simply not sustainable in the long run. The protection of hospitals is covered in article 19. It states that their entitlement to protection ceases if “they are used to commit … acts harmful to the enemy”. A commentary published in 1958 by the International Committee of the Red Cross, the custodian of the Geneva Convention, clarifies that examples of such harmful acts “include the use of a hospital as a shelter for able-bodied combatants or fugitives, as an arms or ammunition store, as a military observation post, or as a centre for liaison with fighting troops”.The international humanitarian law requirement of proportionality does not mean in proportion to the initial attack but in relation to the military objective. If the number of civilians killed in the war is very high, that’s due to Hamas hiding fighters and weaponry deep amid civilian populations. Israel does try to do everything possible – from initial advance warnings to vacate, to choice of targets and weapons – to minimise casualties. But not if that means allowing Hamas to continue as a threat to Israel. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/from-vows-of-never-again-to-a-here-we-go-again-shrug/news-story/90c6fd18385c15734e3a6ce84cf50b06 Got something relivant. In what way is it not relevant duck wit?
|
Forum
Pages: 
Are the Israelis any better than the Nazis? (Read 11321 times)
