Brian Ross wrote on Feb 7
th, 2024 at 4:07pm:
Sounds like a naval problem to me, the Army does not use that many civilian contractors for training. Not sure about the RAAF. Not sure why the Navy would be reliant on civvies but it might be a conscious decision to have sailors on duty, on board ships rather than wearing a uniform in front of a classroom. Diversity is an important factor, it shows the ADF is not dominated by one ethnicity or class, there are no cries of the ADF being disproportionate, as the US Army was when the draft was in force. Teamwork is important and no team could ignore the diversity of it's members. In my time in the Army, we had Asians, Muslims, Greeks, Italians, Poms, Kiwis, Indigenous and Islanders, we all thought we were Australians and were treated as such.
The civilianisation of ADF billets is affecting all three services. It's most noticeable in the RAN due to the distinct separation of sea and shore billets, where many of the shore billets for logistics and maintenance personnel have been put out to tender, resulting in fewer billets for these personnel to go to when they are due shore time. But as I said, it's also noticeable in the RAAF and Army. Professional standards in these civilianised billets have certainly dropped.
The highlighted section is exactly it. People were treated the same no matter what their background and we were all part of the team. However the current emphasis on 'diversity' has only created issues where previously there were none. Morale is low, good people are leaving and recruiting is failing to make up the losses.