Australian Politics Forum - EE Vote: Running Commentary

Jasin Moderator Offline Posts: 47418 Gender:	Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary Reply #60 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:56pm You're such a 'fragile' Brian
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103099
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #61 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:57pm

I have to chime in here.

BO was only following the wishes of the majority of the PA members
when the Mongs were banned.
I did so too after I was more or less forced to have a vote on it.
From memory it was 9 votes to zero that I should ban them all.
What is a leader supposed to do when they get a vote like that - ignore it?

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #62 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:57pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:53pm:

My abuse to Brian in his 'Dictatorship' (Defence) Board was justified in his psychotic hypocrisy of abusing/trolling other members on other Boards and Sections.
But when it came to his own 'Control Freak' luxury in Defence, it was a whole different hypocritical ball game.

So much so, his 'control freak' character began mostly with his 'discipline' if other Members didn't follow/agree with his views in 'absolutism'.
You could say, he was taking Defence a bit too 'seriously'.

In Spatchcock's (former Member) dissaproval of Brian getting to be Mod. She warned she would leave (because he's a typical sexist pig as well) entirely if he became Mod of Defence. Warning that he would 'kill the Board'.

She has been right. Brian now seeks to Mod Extremism Exposed because...
a) he wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it is not allowed.
b) wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it 'will be' allowed.
c) Defence is sunk, he's swimming to this 'Raft' now.
d) No one attends Defence anymore - wonder why?
e) He just want's to ruin another Board?
f) All of the above?

Spatchcock? JaSin you should make up fantasies. How I act in other forums is that I obey the rules laid down. You might like to try that for a change. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #63 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:59pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 7:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 5:05pm:

Children, children, quieten down. Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact. You refused to change so you were banned.

JaSin you were banned because you refused to adhere to the stated rules of the forum. You kept on abusing me and other posters, so you were banned.

You both deserved your bans. QED.

Here, if elected, I would moderate differently to the Defence Forum. Abuse would again not be tolerated but discussion would be. Civilised discussion, that is. Something sadly lacking from the forum in total and this forum in particular. Vote for me, if you favour sane moderation. I will be here for the long term, not a short term.

Am i banned from your section or was that PM you sent me a threat to ban me?

A warning, Baron. I do not make threats, I make promises. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103099
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #64 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:00pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 5:05pm:

Children, children, quieten down. Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact. You refused to change so you were banned.

It's a message board, Brian. If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like. We have too much of that here already.

What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.

Oh, no, Bobby, he'd find, like you did, that he would treated with curtesy, until he refused to accept his lies and conspiracy theories had been corrected, He would not be allowed to bullshit us like you did, Bobby. Then he would be banned. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You can't ban Alexander Downer. Roll Eyes

Alexander Downer,
(born September 9, 1951, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia),
Australian Liberal Party politician who led his party for a brief period in 1994–95
and who served as minister of foreign affairs (1996–2007)
and as Australia’s high commissioner to the United Kingdom (2014–18).

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40938

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #65 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:02pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 5:05pm:

Children, children, quieten down. Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact. You refused to change so you were banned.

It's a message board, Brian. If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like. We have too much of that here already.

It appears that you do not understand the rules of civilised discourse, Black Orchid. I only ban those that cannot follow the rules. You obey the rules and you won't be banned. Tsk, tsk, tsk.... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Jasin

Moderator

Offline

Posts: 47418
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #66 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:07pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:59pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 7:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 5:05pm:

Children, children, quieten down. Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact. You refused to change so you were banned.

JaSin you were banned because you refused to adhere to the stated rules of the forum. You kept on abusing me and other posters, so you were banned.

You both deserved your bans. QED.

Here, if elected, I would moderate differently to the Defence Forum. Abuse would again not be tolerated but discussion would be. Civilised discussion, that is. Something sadly lacking from the forum in total and this forum in particular. Vote for me, if you favour sane moderation. I will be here for the long term, not a short term.

Am i banned from your section or was that PM you sent me a threat to ban me?

A warning, Baron. I do not make threats, I make promises. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Well there's a contradiction right there. Roll Eyes

Also - A Promise Made, is a Debt Unpaid.
We should put an interest rate on your promises. Grin

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103099
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #67 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:08pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:02pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 5:05pm:

Children, children, quieten down. Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact. You refused to change so you were banned.

It's a message board, Brian. If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like. We have too much of that here already.

It appears that you do not understand the rules of civilised discourse, Black Orchid. I only ban those that cannot follow the rules. You obey the rules and you won't be banned. Tsk, tsk, tsk.... Roll Eyes

You ban people who have a different opinion to yours.

The Defence MRB is about all opinions - not just yours. tsk tsk Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin

Moderator

Offline

Posts: 47418
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #68 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:09pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:02pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 5:05pm:

Children, children, quieten down. Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact. You refused to change so you were banned.

It's a message board, Brian. If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like. We have too much of that here already.

It appears that you do not understand the rules of civilised discourse, Black Orchid. I only ban those that cannot follow the rules. You obey the rules and you won't be banned. Tsk, tsk, tsk.... Roll Eyes

Pretty apparent that Brian could never survive in the outside world beyond a barrack. A weak soul, who can't think for himself and hides behind 'rules' that are made for those who can't think for themselves and take 'personal responsibility' for making 'decisions' of their own accord.
Brian is one who needs the 'protection' of the Military - because he is 'weak'.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5808
Gender: female

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #69 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:19pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 5:05pm:

Children, children, quieten down. Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact. You refused to change so you were banned.

It's a message board, Brian. If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like. We have too much of that here already.

What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.

Oh, no, Bobby, he'd find, like you did, that he would treated with curtesy, until he refused to accept his lies and conspiracy theories had been corrected, He would not be allowed to bullshit us like you did, Bobby. Then he would be banned. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

'Conspiracy theories' are part and parcel of every forum, Brian. It's not up to a mod to decide whose opinion is right and whose is wrong.

Forums like these are a dying breed. You need to be a bit open minded.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin

Moderator

Offline

Posts: 47418
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #70 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:20pm

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:57pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:53pm:

My abuse to Brian in his 'Dictatorship' (Defence) Board was justified in his psychotic hypocrisy of abusing/trolling other members on other Boards and Sections.
But when it came to his own 'Control Freak' luxury in Defence, it was a whole different hypocritical ball game.

So much so, his 'control freak' character began mostly with his 'discipline' if other Members didn't follow/agree with his views in 'absolutism'.
You could say, he was taking Defence a bit too 'seriously'.

In Spatchcock's (former Member) dissaproval of Brian getting to be Mod. She warned she would leave (because he's a typical sexist pig as well) entirely if he became Mod of Defence. Warning that he would 'kill the Board'.

She has been right. Brian now seeks to Mod Extremism Exposed because...
a) he wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it is not allowed.
b) wishes to Mod two Boards, knowing it 'will be' allowed.
c) Defence is sunk, he's swimming to this 'Raft' now.
d) No one attends Defence anymore - wonder why?
e) He just want's to ruin another Board?
f) All of the above?

Spatchcock? JaSin you should make up fantasies. How I act in other forums is that I obey the rules laid down. You might like to try that for a change. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You're denial of Spatchcocks opinion of you as a Mod shows your false efforts to coerce that Spatchcock doesn't exist and is mere fantasy. Not very convincing.

'Rules' are only one side of the brain Brian.
You think it is for both sides of the Brain which is where you are flawed and wrong like an over-cooked over-achiever.
People like you 'break', because you can never bend in the wind and the wind never adhere's to 'rules' other than its own.
If you are just thinking 'Rules' via just half of your brain, then you are indeed a complete half-wit.

I do Rules, but I also do more than 'just rules'.

What do you do when there are no 'Rules' Brian?
Can you cope when the enemy doesn't play by 'your rules' on the battlefield?
I doubt it.

I follow the Rules. But I also 'bend' the Rules as they should be. It's called 'flexibility', it's also like 'variation' in the gene pool - though you seem more 'pure' like an inbreed Hapsburg. Grin

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103099
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #71 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:21pm

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:19pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 9:55pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:45pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 6:41pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 5:05pm:

Children, children, quieten down. Bobby you were banned because you repeated your lies and innuendo about Australia's acquisition of nuclear submarines, after you had been told they were lies and conspiracy theories without fact. You refused to change so you were banned.

It's a message board, Brian. If you ban everyone you disagree with eventually there is no-one left to post.

Ditto banning on personalities you don't like. We have too much of that here already.

What Brian is saying is that if Alexander Downer joined this forum -
he would be banned from Brian's MRB -
as his opinions would not be acceptable.

Oh, no, Bobby, he'd find, like you did, that he would treated with curtesy, until he refused to accept his lies and conspiracy theories had been corrected, He would not be allowed to bullshit us like you did, Bobby. Then he would be banned. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

'Conspiracy theories' are part and parcel of every forum, Brian. It's not up to a mod to decide whose opinion is right and whose is wrong.

Forums like these are a dying breed. You need to be a bit open minded.

True and -

You were only following the wishes of the majority of the PA members
when the Mongs were banned.
I did so too after I was more or less forced to have a vote on it.
From memory it was 9 votes to zero that I should ban them all.
What is a leader supposed to do when they get a vote like that - ignore it?

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Moderator Offline Posts: 47418 Gender:	Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary Reply #72 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:23pm Let's face it. Brian is just not a 'people' person. The 'rules' fail him completely in this department. He lacks a personality for starters and thus comes across as a 'bore' ( *yawn ) in his own 'tsk tsk' words in repetitive fashion (lack of imagination too!)
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 103099
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #73 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:26pm

Jasin wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:23pm:

Let's face it.
Brian is just not a 'people' person.
The 'rules' fail him completely in this department.
He lacks a personality for starters and thus comes across as a 'bore' (

*yawn

) in his own 'tsk tsk' words in repetitive fashion (lack of imagination too!) Grin

Correct and as such he is unfit to run the EE forum.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin

Moderator

Offline

Posts: 47418
Gender: male

Re: EE Vote: Running Commentary
Reply #74 - Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:43pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:26pm:

Jasin wrote on Dec 7^th, 2023 at 10:23pm:

Let's face it.
Brian is just not a 'people' person.
The 'rules' fail him completely in this department.
He lacks a personality for starters and thus comes across as a 'bore' (

*yawn

) in his own 'tsk tsk' words in repetitive fashion (lack of imagination too!) Grin

Correct and as such he is unfit to run the EE forum.

Exactly. He is an 'extremist' that is 'exposed'.
He operates on one side of the brain only. Rigid and Logical because he thinks its 'manly' to be so. Negating the other side of the brain that is Fluid and Emotional - which many archaic males think is 'feminine'. Pure myth and fantasy there. Any Logical decision made without being connected to 'Emotion' is the trait of Psychopaths, Dictators and more.

Brian is institutionalised by 'rules'. Told by superiors that all he needs to succeed is to follow the path 'they' set out for him. But when that path ends - he just stands there, waiting, mentally docile, until further instruction. He hasn't the ability to cut his own path, for want of discovering something 'new', compared to the well known path that he follows. He lives in a world that is 'known', but lacks the ability to understand a world that is 'to know'.

It's soldiers like him that could not survive if behind enemy lines.
He's the Member who has the predictable 'Bluff' in a poker hand with his 'Yawn/Tsk/Tsk' because he has nothing in his hand of cards to offer.

I'm a Centrist. I believe in the Left & Right working together towards a 'Wise Mind'.
Brian is an Extremist - far flung in one direction only like a one sided coin of no worth.

This is why he has applied for EE Board.
He's 'killed' the Defence Board like shooting himself in the foot.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged