Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print
Colorado boots Humpty (Read 2052 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58161
Here
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #120 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:29pm
 
Quote:
Colorado boots Humpty



54% of Americans say the ruling is correct including 23% of Republicans. Not Sure also got a lot of votes.


Quote:
Fifty-four percent of voters either strongly or somewhat approve of the decision, the poll found, while 35% strongly or somewhat disapprove and 12% said they were unsure. The results were split along partisan lines, with 84% of Democrats in favor and 66% of Republicans in opposition.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58161
Here
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #121 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:34pm
 
Karnal wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 12:31pm:
Frank wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 10:52am:
Colorado Supreme Court Demands Jack Phillips Bake Cake To Celebrate Trump Ruling


DENVER, CO — In a 4-3 decision, the Colorado Supreme Court will require Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips to bake a celebration cake honoring the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Trump from the ballot.

"The cake must have the words 'Dump Trump' in giant red letters," said Justice Richard Gabriel in his opinion. "No wait — have it say DRUMPF! HA! Classic. And put some little rainbow flags and Palestinian flags all over it. It is the opinion of the court that failure to bake this cake for us constitutes illegal discrimination."

Justice Gabriel then banged his gavel loudly to make it official.


Not satire.



I know, right? I hear American judges are pretty tough on crime, old boy. They like to bang their gavels ever so.

Justice Gabriel is referring to the Trump family's legal name, a German one with Nazi connections on the paternal side. The Palestinian flags represent the big fella's hatred of Bibi and his reference to Hezbollah being really smart.

He's suggesting the cake so that Mr Trumpf won't get all toosh and blame the court for doing its job.

You know, a bit like you will after reading this post.

WITCH HUNT!!!


Quote:
WITCH HUNT!!


There have been about 8 different methods used in various Trump cases. The evidence does seem to confirm that he is in fact a witch.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
wombatwoody
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3181
Wombat  NSW
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #122 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm
 
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.
Back to top
 

We are benefiting from ... the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.

Benjamin Netanyahu, quoted in Ma’ariv, 16 April 2008
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58161
Here
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #123 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:57pm
 
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm:
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.


Even if True it isn't a constitutional breach that would bar him from office.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95293
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #124 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:05pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:57pm:
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm:
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.


Even if True it isn't a constitutional breach that would bar him from office.


It's not true. Wombat's referring to the eight million people reported to have entered America illegally over the past three presidential administrations.

If true, it would make his DL inelligible again.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #125 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:22pm
 
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm:
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.


Where exactly is that stated in section 3 of the 14th amendment?

I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 47418
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #126 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:26pm
 
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP.
TRUMP
TRUMP
TURMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP
TRUMP

Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
wombatwoody
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3181
Wombat  NSW
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #127 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:33pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:57pm:
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm:
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.


Even if True it isn't a constitutional breach that would bar him from office.


It certainly is a constitutional breach.

Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall guarantee to protect every State against invasion;

This was to guarantee that each state of the union was protected against invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels and uncontrolled (illegal) immigration.  If we cannot control our borders we cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it's that simple.

https://danhappel.com/article-4-section-4-protecting-our-borders-under-the-u-s-c...

Back to top
 

We are benefiting from ... the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.

Benjamin Netanyahu, quoted in Ma’ariv, 16 April 2008
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 47418
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #128 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:39pm
 
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:33pm:
Dnarever wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:57pm:
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm:
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.


Even if True it isn't a constitutional breach that would bar him from office.


It certainly is a constitutional breach.

Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall guarantee to protect every State against invasion;

This was to guarantee that each state of the union was protected against invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels and uncontrolled (illegal) immigration.  If we cannot control our borders we cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it's that simple.

https://danhappel.com/article-4-section-4-protecting-our-borders-under-the-u-s-c...



The Democrats are letting Americans down like a Gay cowardly fart.
Just like the French, who think they are better than the British at Politics, are letting Europe down against the adversity of Islam.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #129 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:45pm
 
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:33pm:
Dnarever wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:57pm:
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm:
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.


Even if True it isn't a constitutional breach that would bar him from office.


It certainly is a constitutional breach.

Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall guarantee to protect every State against invasion;

This was to guarantee that each state of the union was protected against invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels and uncontrolled (illegal) immigration.  If we cannot control our borders we cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it's that simple.

https://danhappel.com/article-4-section-4-protecting-our-borders-under-the-u-s-c...



Where exactly is that stated in section 3 of the 14th amendment?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58161
Here
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #130 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:47pm
 
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:33pm:
Dnarever wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:57pm:
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm:
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.


Even if True it isn't a constitutional breach that would bar him from office.


It certainly is a constitutional breach.

Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall guarantee to protect every State against invasion;

This was to guarantee that each state of the union was protected against invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels and uncontrolled (illegal) immigration.  If we cannot control our borders we cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it's that simple.

https://danhappel.com/article-4-section-4-protecting-our-borders-under-the-u-s-c...



Quote:
The Guarantee Clause

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.


The clause says no such thing about immigration - that is just silly.

There is no penalty under this that would bar anyone from holding office.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #131 - Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:49pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:47pm:
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 8:33pm:
Dnarever wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:57pm:
wombatwoody wrote on Dec 22nd, 2023 at 7:56pm:
So a Texas court should similarly rule Biden ineligible, on the grounds that he's violated federal immigration law by allowing 8 million illegals to enter the county.


Even if True it isn't a constitutional breach that would bar him from office.


It certainly is a constitutional breach.

Article 4 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: The United States shall guarantee to protect every State against invasion;

This was to guarantee that each state of the union was protected against invasion by foreign nations, revolutionary forces, drug cartels and uncontrolled (illegal) immigration.  If we cannot control our borders we cannot defend our national sovereignty…..it's that simple.

https://danhappel.com/article-4-section-4-protecting-our-borders-under-the-u-s-c...



Quote:
The Guarantee Clause

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.


The clause says no such thing about imigration - that is just silly.


And nothing about being removed from the ballot.

Wombat is very confused.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38526
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #132 - Dec 23rd, 2023 at 1:48pm
 
So, SCOTUS has declined to urgently hear the motion Smith proposed about Trump's pervasive arguments on presidential immunity.

I do hope it remains consistent and refuses to hear from Trump on an urgent basis about the Colorado decision to oust him.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #133 - Dec 23rd, 2023 at 2:03pm
 
Aussie wrote on Dec 23rd, 2023 at 1:48pm:
So, SCOTUS has declined to urgently hear the motion Smith proposed about Trump's pervasive arguments on presidential immunity.

I do hope it remains consistent and refuses to hear from Trump on an urgent basis about the Colorado decision to oust him.


Lol, yeah   Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 136426
Gender: male
Re: Colorado boots Humpty
Reply #134 - Dec 23rd, 2023 at 2:26pm
 
Aussie wrote on Dec 23rd, 2023 at 1:48pm:
So, SCOTUS has declined to urgently hear the motion Smith proposed about Trump's pervasive arguments on presidential immunity.


Which means they will ultimately rule against Trump   Smiley

If they were going to rule in his favour, they would have done it  now by granting Smith his motion.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print