Frank wrote on Jan 12
th, 2024 at 1:50pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 12
th, 2024 at 12:21pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 12
th, 2024 at 11:55am:
This one doesn't use whole sentences.
Ah... I keep forgetting your low IQ...you can't connect the dots.
Frank wanted me to cite just ONE person who believes in unregulated personal freedom, and you chimed in with "several are in my head" - a meaningless non sequitur.
...and lo and behold Graps (libertarian extraordinaire) shows up, with an equally meaningless non sequitur, failing to address any of the the arguments.
"Deplorable".
So who wants unregulated individual freedom?
The fools who equate democracy with good governance....not to mention graps who thinks governance itself is the problem.
Quote:Who has even the illusion that unregulated, unfettered individual freedom is desirable or achievable?
"Democracy" /"freedom values" ideologues who raise the "individual freedom" delusion above collective wellbeing.
Quote:I think your mindless, hyperbolic parroting has run away with you, as usual.
Ad hominem; you need to explain how the egregious effects of rule by 50%+1 of self-interested "free " individuals, can be ameliorated.
Quote:Are you posting here as a free individual
Yes, in as much as I can be "free" in a world with billions of other self-interested "free" individuals.
Quote:or as a result of a collective decision that you are obeying? (Careful, trick question, Son of Xi Ping Pong.)
No trick; I'm arguing for the prosperity of the collective...spot the difference?