freediver wrote on Jan 21
st, 2024 at 3:11pm:
Quote:The UNSC - with 99.5 % of the world's military force speaking with one voice, is not a "committee".
Yes it is. When was the last time they forced a country to go to war?
The UNSC has never operated with one voice (due to the veto); but in the case of a sovereign Palestine alongside Israel, it could - because all SC members are on board with UN 242.
In other words, if eg, Iran was shown to be still arming groups dedicated to Israel's destruction (after the establishment of Palestine), then Iran's leaders could be identified before the entire UNGA and all the world's media, judged, and progressively eliminated via smart drone tech until the state desisted from acting against UN defined international law. .
[Note: for the first time in history, the leaders can be taken out, rather than via destroying entire nations in all out war, as in WW2. Technology has now advanced far enough to allow identification of individuals' whereabouts at any time]
btw , it was gratifying (to me) to hear Biden (just now, on radio) thinking outside the box re securuty: he noted there are several UN member states who don't have militaries, and Palestine could be another of them, to allay Israeli fears.
Quote:Countries still go to war on their own decision, with or without UNSC approval.
Addressed above: solving the security issue involved in UN res 242 could usher in a new era re war making; sure - Russia vetoed a peace plan in Ukraine - though reports say the US also hindered a peace plan.....the UNSC veto is a disaster, but it need not wreck Palestine-Israel security because all 5 members would be on the same page.
Quote:The UNSC is merely a way for countries that wish to, to "officially" give themselves permission to do so.
In practice, yes, the UNSC is usually f**kd by the veto; but in the case of Palestine-Israel, all SC members would agree since they all support UN res 242.
Like I said, progressive elimination of the leaders of criminal nations (ie those ignoring internatoinal law) would be very effective in bringing those nations back into line...
Quote:That is why all your complaints about "legality" are fairly meaningless.
I have dealt with the effects of the veto, above; and yes, war is still 'legal' (even though insane in the age of MAD -how much damage has to happen in Ukraine before the war stops - or - leads to WW3, a nuclear war....)
Quote:You are appealing to an authority that does not actually exist.
Correct, but the authority that the UNSC
could bring to Palestine-Israel, given the 5 members of the UNSC are in agreement re UN res 242 (if Biden grows a pair...) is achievable.
Quote: I am not sure if you latch onto the UN out of fear of the chaos that you think reality would invoke,
I loathe the insanity, death and destruction of war which is always happening around us; nothing to do with fear of what might happen, it's happening now - and non-stop since WW2 --because of the UNSC veto.
Quote:or because you are one of those rule lovers who thinks paperwork trumps reality, but it is tiresome watching you invoke them constantly.
That particular posited 'reason' is wrong, though certainly
rule of law (..."paperwork", thanks for the chuckle, but you forgot the associated
law enforcement) is preferable to chaos, so don't you worry about that (...as a certain Oz politician used to say).