Australian Politics Forum - little pinks vs democracy

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49054
At my desk.

little pinks vs democracy
Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:49pm

thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:27pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:05pm:

Quote:

The part which says 50% + 1 determines (non-existent) "rights".

Much better to have the CCP tell you eh?

The CCP has a goal of common prosperity.

So - assuming the CCP is not derailed by orthodox 'survival of the fittest' Western neoclassical economics - yes.

The CCP has a goal of self preservation. They would happily starve 50 million of their own citizens to death if it supported that goal. Hardly "common prosperity" though is it?

The CCP fears democracy and the free flow of information because it knows it would not last long if the Chinese people were given a real choice.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 48529
Gender: male

Re: little pinks vs democracy
Reply #1 - Jan 28^th, 2024 at 1:08pm

The CCP fears China will jilt Politics and Military as its cultural priorities which is like China jilting North America (Politics) and the Middle-East (Military) from dominating it and allowing the Mathmaticians and Accountants to make the country more prosperous.

Even Nelson Mandela knew that Sport will empower Africa more than what Politics could. Survival of the 'fittest' works in Africa. Not survival of the 'talker'.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

tickleandrose

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4013
Gender: female

Re: little pinks vs democracy
Reply #2 - Jan 28^th, 2024 at 10:56pm

freediver wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:49pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:27pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:05pm:

Quote:

The part which says 50% + 1 determines (non-existent) "rights".

Much better to have the CCP tell you eh?

The CCP has a goal of common prosperity.

So - assuming the CCP is not derailed by orthodox 'survival of the fittest' Western neoclassical economics - yes.

The CCP has a goal of self preservation. They would happily starve 50 million of their own citizens to death if it supported that goal. Hardly "common prosperity" though is it?

The CCP fears democracy and the free flow of information because it knows it would not last long if the Chinese people were given a real choice.

Then, this lead to the next question. If the Chinese government is willing to sacrifice the lives of 50 million to gain an advantage. Then, what are we willing to sacrifice to compete?

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 48529
Gender: male

Re: little pinks vs democracy
Reply #3 - Jan 28^th, 2024 at 11:12pm

tickleandrose wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 10:56pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:49pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:27pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:05pm:

Quote:

The part which says 50% + 1 determines (non-existent) "rights".

Much better to have the CCP tell you eh?

The CCP has a goal of common prosperity.

So - assuming the CCP is not derailed by orthodox 'survival of the fittest' Western neoclassical economics - yes.

The CCP has a goal of self preservation. They would happily starve 50 million of their own citizens to death if it supported that goal. Hardly "common prosperity" though is it?

The CCP fears democracy and the free flow of information because it knows it would not last long if the Chinese people were given a real choice.

Then, this lead to the next question. If the Chinese government is willing to sacrifice the lives of 50 million to gain an advantage. Then, what are we willing to sacrifice to compete?

We became enslaved as America's 51st State.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49054
At my desk.

Re: little pinks vs democracy
Reply #4 - Jan 29^th, 2024 at 6:38am

tickleandrose wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 10:56pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:49pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:27pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 28^th, 2024 at 12:05pm:

Quote:

The part which says 50% + 1 determines (non-existent) "rights".

Much better to have the CCP tell you eh?

The CCP has a goal of common prosperity.

So - assuming the CCP is not derailed by orthodox 'survival of the fittest' Western neoclassical economics - yes.

The CCP has a goal of self preservation. They would happily starve 50 million of their own citizens to death if it supported that goal. Hardly "common prosperity" though is it?

The CCP fears democracy and the free flow of information because it knows it would not last long if the Chinese people were given a real choice.

Then, this lead to the next question. If the Chinese government is willing to sacrifice the lives of 50 million to gain an advantage. Then, what are we willing to sacrifice to compete?

It's not a competition to see who can kill the most of their own citizens.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged