Australian Politics Forum - Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 47475
Gender: male

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #30 - Feb 13^th, 2024 at 5:51pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 3:27pm:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, we have some deniers of modern science. Genetics replaced eugenics because there is no difference genetically between different "racial" groups. As I have already explained different "races" have no problems interbreeding. None at all. You know you fools can attempt to deny it but Genetics has significant scientific evidence backing it. The human genome is basically identical across all the so-called "racial" groups. There is only one "race", the human one. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Everyone understands that humanity has had different hybrids, that is, races.

It's not a miracle or a random accident that two Sudanese parents will have a bllack kiddie or that two Irish parents won't.

The differences are readily perceived by everyone. Are blacks less intelligent, statistically, than East Asians? Yes. Is that genetic? Up to a point but not entirely.
Is black ghetto culture stupid and toxic? Absolutely.
Are you stupid and confused. No doubt.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 13^th, 2024 at 8:10pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Online

Posts: 49289
Gender: male

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #31 - Feb 13^th, 2024 at 8:04pm

To add.
The Negroid Africans are very genetically isolated (physical isolation) compared to the other races like Caucasoids and Mongoloids. All three are relatively 'young' races genetically, compared to those older ones that spawned the likes of San, Ainu, North Sentinalese, Adaman Islanders, Tasmanian (Denisovian) Aborigines, Melanesians, Indigi Tibetans and more. Neanderthal and Denisovian being even older.

The 'Culture' (mentality isolation) of the Mongoloid Asians is also very isolated.

Thus the perception (possibly the 'old' perception) of the Negroid being the Physical and Mongoloid being the Mental is still in play and especially used by the 'Western' Caucasoid view (which is why it might be the 'old' view) unlike what an Eastern Caucasoid in Australian might perceive with the 'mentality' of Black Africa through the Aborigine 'portal' and the 'physicality' of the Mongoloid (via Polynesian) in reverse as the 'new'.

Don't you just love this world?

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 42267

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #32 - Feb 13^th, 2024 at 9:14pm

JC Denton wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 5:29pm:

its the process of artifically manipulating conditions to increase (positive eugenics) or decrease (negative eugenics) the prevalence of a socially desirable/undesirable trait in a human population

giving good looking people money to have more children would be a non-coercive example of positive eugenics

paying ugly people to undertake a sterilising procedure would be a non-coercive example of negative eugenics

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, you seem to be glossing over the bad aspects of Eugenics, EmpNap in an effort to keep it in a good light. The Racists used Eugenics to force people to breed in the way they believed to benefit their views. The Nazis took it one step further and attempted to eliminate Untermensch, such as Gypsies, Gays and Jews. The Racists in southern North America bred Blacks and used them in medical experiments against their wills. Genetics has proven Eugenics to be a false belief based on false premises. There are, as I have explained no genetic differences between the various "Racial" groups. The belief that Blacks and Asians and so on, are separate sub-species is poppycock, utter bullshit based on superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye shape, frizziness of hair and the size of noses. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

JC Denton

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5471
Gender: female

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #33 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 2:57am

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 9:14pm:

JC Denton wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 5:29pm:

its the process of artifically manipulating conditions to increase (positive eugenics) or decrease (negative eugenics) the prevalence of a socially desirable/undesirable trait in a human population

giving good looking people money to have more children would be a non-coercive example of positive eugenics

paying ugly people to undertake a sterilising procedure would be a non-coercive example of negative eugenics

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, you seem to be glossing over the bad aspects of Eugenics, EmpNap in an effort to keep it in a good light. The Racists used Eugenics to force people to breed in the way they believed to benefit their views. The Nazis took it one step further and attempted to eliminate Untermensch, such as Gypsies, Gays and Jews. The Racists in southern North America bred Blacks and used them in medical experiments against their wills. Genetics has proven Eugenics to be a false belief based on false premises. There are, as I have explained no genetic differences between the various "Racial" groups. The belief that Blacks and Asians and so on, are separate sub-species is poppycock, utter bullshit based on superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye shape, frizziness of hair and the size of noses. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

thats literally what it means

it can be coercive or non coercive, applied reasonably or misapplied, i didnt say otherwise

point was the original context you used the word made no sense at all

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 47475
Gender: male

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #34 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 7:56am

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 9:14pm:

There are, as I have explained no genetic differences between the various "Racial" groups. The belief that Blacks and Asians and so on, are separate sub-species is poppycock, utter bullshit based on superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye shape, frizziness of hair and the size of noses. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

How do those characteristics get passed on if not genetically, cockwomble?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

JC Denton

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5471
Gender: female

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #35 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 9:22am

Quote:

There are, as I have explained no genetic differences between the various "Racial" groups. The belief that Blacks and Asians and so on, are separate sub-species is poppycock, utter bullshit based on superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye shape, frizziness of hair and the size of noses. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

those so-called "superficial characteristics" assuming your argument is true that those are the only phenotypes that differ between human continental population group (note: they arent) are literally the basis for how sub-specieal taxonomic classifications are defined you absolute nong Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Online Posts: 49289 Gender:	Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan Reply #36 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 10:13am Insects breed with Plants. My pumpkin flower got a good fertilisation from a bee this morning. Other flowers have been rooted and there are already some preggy looking pumpkins growing. Definitely not a one race thing there.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 42267

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #37 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 11:13am

Frank wrote on Feb 14^th, 2024 at 7:56am:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 9:14pm:

There are, as I have explained no genetic differences between the various "Racial" groups. The belief that Blacks and Asians and so on, are separate sub-species is poppycock, utter bullshit based on superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye shape, frizziness of hair and the size of noses. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

How do those characteristics get passed on if not genetically, cockwomble?

The point is that different "Racial" groups contain individuals which exhibit the same characteristics. So, you have Jews with small noses, you have Asians with straight eye lids, you Africans who are pale, you have Indigenous Australians who look like Europeans... Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Online Posts: 49289 Gender:	Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan Reply #38 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 11:17am Brian even breeds with little hominids.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 42267

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #39 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 11:17am

JC Denton wrote on Feb 14^th, 2024 at 9:22am:

Quote:

There are, as I have explained no genetic differences between the various "Racial" groups. The belief that Blacks and Asians and so on, are separate sub-species is poppycock, utter bullshit based on superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye shape, frizziness of hair and the size of noses. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

those so-called "superficial characteristics" assuming your argument is true that those are the only phenotypes that differ between human continental population group (note: they arent) are literally the basis for how sub-specieal taxonomic classifications are defined you absolute nong Cheesy

Taxonomy has been turned on it's head since the arrival modern Genetics, EmpNat. Whereas taxonomy relied on physical characterists today it relies on Genetic differences. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 47475
Gender: male

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #40 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 11:49am

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 14^th, 2024 at 11:13am:

Frank wrote on Feb 14^th, 2024 at 7:56am:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 9:14pm:

There are, as I have explained no genetic differences between the various "Racial" groups. The belief that Blacks and Asians and so on, are separate sub-species is poppycock, utter bullshit based on superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye shape, frizziness of hair and the size of noses. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

How do those characteristics get passed on if not genetically, cockwomble?

The point is that different "Racial" groups contain individuals which exhibit the same characteristics. So, you have Jews with small noses, you have Asians with straight eye lids, you Africans who are pale, you have Indigenous Australians who look like Europeans... Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Yeah, because they are three quarters or more Europeans. Genetics.

Two Japanese parents will never produce an african kid, nor the other way around. These characteristics are disctinctive, instantly recogisable and are genetically transmitted.

Black Pride, Aboriginal Voice, White Man's Burden - these are not about superficial nose shapes.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

JC Denton Gold Member Offline Posts: 5471 Gender:	Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan Reply #41 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 12:07pm Quote: You have Indigenous Australians who look like Europeans LMAO
Back to top	IP Logged

JC Denton

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5471
Gender: female

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #42 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 12:09pm

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 14^th, 2024 at 11:17am:

JC Denton wrote on Feb 14^th, 2024 at 9:22am:

Quote:

There are, as I have explained no genetic differences between the various "Racial" groups. The belief that Blacks and Asians and so on, are separate sub-species is poppycock, utter bullshit based on superficial characteristics such as skin colour, eye shape, frizziness of hair and the size of noses. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

those so-called "superficial characteristics" assuming your argument is true that those are the only phenotypes that differ between human continental population group (note: they arent) are literally the basis for how sub-specieal taxonomic classifications are defined you absolute nong Cheesy

Taxonomy has been turned on it's head since the arrival modern Genetics, EmpNat. Whereas taxonomy relied on physical characterists today it relies on Genetic differences. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

and human populations literally have genetic differences (unless you apply that b.s lewontian sleight of hand linus tried to pull on us a few months ago here) because if they didnt, they f_cking wouldnt look different

if there were no individual genetic differences, everybody would be an identical clone of each other like monozygotic twins are; if there were no group differences, everybody would look like the same race

holy sh1t man

Back to top

IP Logged

thegreatdivide

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13094
Gender: male

Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan
Reply #43 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 12:35pm

Frank wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 5:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 13^th, 2024 at 3:27pm:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, we have some deniers of modern science. Genetics replaced eugenics because there is no difference genetically between different "racial" groups. As I have already explained different "races" have no problems interbreeding. None at all. You know you fools can attempt to deny it but Genetics has significant scientific evidence backing it. The human genome is basically identical across all the so-called "racial" groups. There is only one "race", the human one. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Everyone understands that humanity has had different hybrids, that is, races.

....who can interbreed.

Quote:

It's not a miracle or a random accident that two Sudanese parents will have a bllack kiddie or that two Irish parents won't.

Indeed.

Quote:

The differences are readily perceived by everyone. Are blacks less intelligent, statistically, than East Asians? Yes.

Q: where do 'Aryans' fit, on the IQ scale; why were Europeans the ones who began the Industrial Revolution?

Quote:

Is that genetic?
Up to a point but not entirely.

well - ok...what are the "not entirely" factors?

Quote:

Is black ghetto culture stupid and toxic? Absolutely.

Surely you aren't denying non-genetic factors...

Quote:

Are you stupid and confused. No doubt.

Careful there - it's mirror time.

Back to top

IP Logged

JC Denton Gold Member Offline Posts: 5471 Gender:	Re: Yellow Racism?>Miss Japan Reply #44 - Feb 14^th, 2024 at 1:10pm Quote: where do 'Aryans' fit, on the IQ scale; 100
Back to top	IP Logged