Frank wrote on Feb 27^th, 2024 at 12:13pm:


Poor Frank, his incapacitated brain can't  think for himself.


By definition, dysfunctional families are - dysfunctional.

The question is -  what causes the dysfunction and criminality related to systemic poverty caused by your vicious 'survival of the fittest' economic orthodoxy (with its poverty-level welfare dependency) - the opposite of participatory societal love.

   

thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 27^th, 2024 at 12:30pm:



if you believed in survival of the fittest, you would see the sudanese as having the right to take grannys car.

thats not the position of the noble conservative.


the noble masculine sees it as a duty to protect and provide

to protect this lady

something which you and bwian do not see as a duty

hence you are not of the noble masculine but weak sauce girly men

aquascoot wrote on Feb 27^th, 2024 at 12:58pm:


You error here: confusing the current dominant survival of the fittest neo-liberal economic orthodoxy (as opposed to socialist above poverty participation by all), with crime which results from the operation of that socially-imposed neo-liberal orthodoxy. 

Quote:


On the contrary; the conservative position - every man for himself in an 'invisible hand' market driven by self-interest alone (with a poverty-level welfare safety net operated by the government) causes massive inequality and criminality, as the least competitve fall into welfare dependency.

Quote:


Your appeal to the individual "masculine" ("to protect and provide") demonstrates your error; the individual (masculine or not) cannot protect the least competitive from your vicious 'survival of the fittest'/ rule of the jungle'  macro economy.

Quote:


Brian and I - and you - would have had to be on the spot to assist the particular lady from a criminal act.

Quote:


Hence you show the degree of your mental incapacitation; intervention in a specific crime is separate  from your vicious survival of the fittest conservative system which causes the crime.

Only a Racist desperate for attention would called the "Stolen Generations" as a "Rescued Generation".  Soren, why don't you ask it's members if they think they were "rescued"?  Were you rescued from the orthodoxy post-war Europe experienced? It's the only explanation for your Racism.  You seem to hate anybody non-Aryan.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... 

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 27^th, 2024 at 5:18pm:



and yet since aboriginal kids are no longer taken , they have fallen behind in 17 of the 19 parameters used to judge the success of the 'closing the gap" initiative.

why does brain want to see aboriginal kids go backwards

how ugly

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 27^th, 2024 at 5:18pm:





You are slurring and drooling, Bbwian.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 25^th, 2024 at 5:49pm:


From what I read about in newspapers and what Vyleen's husband has been quoted to have said, Vyleen did not have a chance to hand over the keys. It could be very plausible that the offenders snuck up on Vyleen and maybe gave her one chance. She might well have been shocked by the act, and might not have known what to do at that moment. The offenders might well have just not given her a chance to recognise that she was being robbed. And that is what exacerbates people's emotions about this murder. A vulnerable woman being robbed and killed by thugs that had no concern for whether the lady lived.

Even if Vyleen resisted, the robbers would have had the car keys from Vyleen without much trouble. Vyleen would have been injured, very likely. But, she would have been alive. Even violent junkies would allow someone they are robbing to live. These 'animals' did not even have that much empathy.