Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote Yesterday at 10:47am:
Let's try an example- I've done this before but you missed it:-
"The issue, as I see it, is that no one is willing to engage with you, and rather than introspect, you’re projecting that frustration onto me.
I’d wager this reluctance stems largely from your pattern of fabricating claims, attributing them to others, and then demanding they defend positions they never held. When they do engage, you ignore their responses, evade reciprocating by answering direct questions, and instead play the perpetual victim of supposed bad faith.
It’s the same tired routine: dismiss anything that doesn’t align with your views, declare victory without merit, and move on.
Frankly, there’s nothing to gain from engaging with someone who operates in such a manner.
And as if that weren’t enough, you repeatedly repost the same images in a transparent attempt to obscure your embarrassment.
For someone so eager to claim triumph, why are you behaving like such a sore loser? "
That's what's left after your ranting, capisce?
The issue is, that what you're dismissing as a rant is a simple summation of the situation we find ourselves in.
A snapshot of reality.
You're simply proving this to also be true:
SadKangaroo wrote on Dec 21
st, 2024 at 8:24am:
But that’s Grap in a nutshell, when reality challenges his beliefs, he simply rejects reality and accuses anyone who doesn't of being delusional.
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote Yesterday at 10:47am:
What you are in reality discussing there is YOUR approach to any and every discussion - clearly laid out right there in that rant. all the assumptions, evasions, inability to think, refusal to look at the actual evidence in front of you (in this strand the one-by-one recommendations (and that's what they are) of the Cass Review to develop RECOMMENDATIONS, put there for your discussion - you (and m) don't even recognise them for what they are while raving about 'the cass review' and 'misinterpreting' - all empty words - and then later stamped PASSED due to NO attempt at discussion of the actual report).
I've made genuine attempts to engage, but you consistently retreat and shut down at the faintest hint of pushback against your claims, even when asked simply to clarify them.
It’s baffling. If you’re truly confident in your position, the least you can do is articulate your arguments clearly.
Moreover, if your views are not merely the by-products of preconceived biases, you should be open to reassessing them in light of compelling evidence. Yet, you won’t even entertain the notion of changing your mind, let alone outline what standard of evidence would prompt you to do so.
Instead, you prematurely declare victory in a battle you refuse to fight, all while evading accountability for the information, answers, or follow-up questions prompted by your own assertions.
This is why I’ve said before: you should consider starting a blog where you can curate the content, control the narrative, and moderate comments to your satisfaction.
It’s painfully clear you cannot handle disagreement or engage with people who substantiate claims that challenge your views.
Quote:Clearly any 'projection' is on your part. mothra I can tolerate to a certain extent, since the behaviour is that of a surly child - but you are claiming to be some intellectual giant. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Show us in that endless meaningless ranting where you could ever be any such thing?
I've never claimed to be an intellectual giant. If you’re feeling self-conscious or intimidated by my posts, that's your shortcomings and inadequacies talking.
That’s your problem, not mine, champ.
Forum
Pages: 
