Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote Yesterday at 7:04pm:


But I explained already that the recommendations are supporting better outcomes for gender affirming care, but you rejected that because there isn't a direct quote from the author (because it wasn't the aim of the study), saying they support gender affirmation.

How does that not equally apply to the inverse and your position?

They don't say directly that they reject it, so you're saying the safeguards in their recommendations means it's rejected?



You've just done what you've rejected from others.

You can't have it both ways.

So which is it?

Especially since you're the one who suggested they accepted it and demanded others prove it.

You've failed miserably and by your own standard to prove your point from the review.

SadKangaroo wrote Yesterday at 8:02pm:


What are you raving about?  The moment you started off on the wrong foot - I stopped reading the nonsense.  You've never yet heard my 'position', since you've wound all discussion up in your chosen path of personality clash rather than actual issues.

'They don't say directly' - no need to - a full range of diagnostics and treatments automatically precludes the current false approach of  instant 'gender affirmation' from a list on the desk, and starting on the Low Road of drugs and cutting from there.

I've 'failed' in nothing - the review will overturn the current approach of instant gender affirming - the reviews under way and the stopping of such things as puberty blockers in nation after nation show the way this is going.  At the end of the day the 'transgender' community will be once again miniscule - all the pretenders or false leads will be weeded out, leaving only the very tiny number of 'real' ones - the intractables (if such a term as real can be applied to this gross distortion of reality)... and as I've said over and over - those who remain - last transwomen standing, so to speak - may then receive better care.

Defined as 'the confusion between mind and body' - in a perfectly normally functioning body - that leaves only one resolution.... it's a head problem.

You are on the wrong side of history.

You clearly have issues with understanding, and forever try to turn any discussion into a personal dispute - you lose again.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote Yesterday at 9:16pm:


Then as usual, it's pointless engaging with you, white flag accepted, we're done.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote Yesterday at 9:56pm:



I swore to myself i wouldn't bother, you're just too ridiculous but this couldn't go uncorrected.

The Cass Report is a raft of recommendations for gender affirming care, you preposterous old fool.

Just because you don't agree with what a thing sounds like, it doesn't mean that thing doesn't exist.