aquascoot wrote Today at 4:53am:
mothra wrote Today at 12:17am:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote Yesterday at 9:56pm:
Your fanatical clinging to 'gender affirmation' in the days of 'fact-based diagnosis' is the greatest white flag ever presented.
You cling desperately to the last floating match after the shipwreck and just keep going round and round in circles, trying to smokescreen your utter defeat by loading your responses. It's not working.
There is no more 'gender affirmation' in the Civilised World.
I swore to myself i wouldn't bother, you're just too ridiculous but this couldn't go uncorrected.
The Cass Report is a raft of recommendations
for gender affirming care, you preposterous old fool.
Just because you don't agree with what a thing sounds like, it doesn't mean that thing doesn't exist.
incorrect.
the trans issue was the number one issue for undecided voters in america
if harris had come out and said
a woman is an ADULT FEMALE HUMAN she may have won the election.
people with common sense know that is what a woman is
the refusal of morons like yourself to speak with common sense makes you come accross as arrogant smug superior dickheads (which you are)
till you realise this character flaw, the majority of people are going to treat you that way and rightly so
You're blatantly conflating the culture war over the existence and acceptance of trans people with the Cass Review.
While you're not the only one doing this, it's still as tiresome as it is transparent.
The Cass Review was commissioned by the NHS in the UK to investigate the services provided to children and young people experiencing gender dysphoria. Led by Dr Hilary Cass, its focus was clear: assess the quality, safety, and effectiveness of care, particularly at the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) at the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust.
The recommendations were aimed at improving gender-affirming care for the identified group. Full stop.
You’re free to indulge in debates about whether trans people should exist or reduce it all to "mental health issues" if that's the particular flavour of bigotry you're into, but none of that is relevant to the Cass Review.
And here’s the hard truth: calling for more robust data and studies into the effectiveness of treatments like puberty blockers or surgeries isn’t an attack on gender affirmation. It’s about ensuring better outcomes for current and future patients. Yet certain bad-faith actors, those obsessive, mendacious types, keep twisting this into a referendum on trans existence.
They can’t quote where the review supports their narrative because it doesn’t and they know it. Instead of proving their baseless claims, they resort to demanding others disprove them. That’s already been done, of course, but they simply ignore it, reject the evidence, and then smugly declare that their unproven assertions must be valid because nothing has "disproved" them to their satisfaction.
The real issue? Their pet topic wasn’t within the scope of the review. It’s neither confirmed nor debunked because it wasn’t relevant. And yet, they made the claim, so the burden of proof is on them, a burden they’re entirely incapable of shouldering.
But why let facts get in the way? They’ve already decided the outcome they want, and they’ll twist, distort, and outright fabricate reality to fit their fragile, self-serving narrative. It’s intellectual dishonesty at its most predictable and pathetic.
It’s the same dreary, cowardly tactic we’ve seen before, loud, ignorant, and desperately clinging to their imagined victimhood.
This review is based in the UK, and you're talking about US politics.
You're better than that Scoot.
Forum
Pages: 
