Skippy you are missing the point

How many people have even heard of a cazz report

Most people want common sense to be applied
They don't want men with penises in women's toilets
They don't want  Men beating the front bottom out of women
In sporting events

And they want the definition Of a woman to go back to being an adult female human

And they certainly Have no interest in what someone's pronouns are

They see the whole circus as mental masturbation and want no part of it

This  Doesn't mean they hate trans people
They just hate Control freaks from the intellectual left

Kanga and mothra - you would do well to copy down all these points in the Cass Review - the recommendations thaat have been passed due to lack of any contrary comment.... the final question will be on exactly that - and one exactly where it says anything to 'support' 'gender affirmation'.

You first tried to fault it as anti-trans - that failed - now you try to twist its lack of words into being somehow a support of your 'gender affirmation'.  Australia may be among the slowest in waking up about this 'gender' madness - but it is ..... and all will become apparent soon to you hardened ideologues quoting from the Little Cutting Book

"You're blatantly conflating the culture war over the existence and acceptance of trans people with the Cass Review."

And there you have the tranny agenda approach in a nutshell, poppets.

a.  go for the victimhood - see 'existence', 'acceptance' .. as if these are the issues and not whether or not countless other problems are leading to the destruction of children in many ways

b  accuse all other views of being 'error'

c.  go further and actually accuse all other views of being 'blatantly conflating' what the review actually says - apparently away from the Agenda's 'approved view'.  Clearly conspiracy dementia/delusion/ truthophobia.

d.  make totally unfounded claims based on nothing, that reviews are actually in favour of the current disastrous approach when they say nothing about the current approach but instead list approaches as far away from it as possible, and rave that those reviews are in favour rather than being the death knell of that failed approach


All this comes down to is an incredibly infantile demand that whatever they think or imagine they feel MUST be accepted by everyone without question, without regard to the costs in countless ways, and regardless of any genuine science.....  and if you reject such outlandish behaviour they'll throw a trantrum, call you names, and yell at you ... so there!

Self-destructing as we speak....     says one hell of a lot about 'mothra' and 'sad kangaroo' do'n it?             

The recommendations were aimed at improving care for the identified group. Full stop.

"So the 'gender affirming care" is a big lie, whether uttered by psychiatrists or you. There is no such thing as gender outside grammar. "

And the RANZCPsych now requires fact-based diagnosis as totally opposed to some form of self-declaration.

As someone posted on another forum - taking a lead from me - it is not 'gender affirming' since there is absolutely no science to demonstrate that there is any other gender than the one the person is born in, and to date there have been ZERO reports of any applicant being 'affirmed' in the gender they are in from birth.  On top of that - it is not 'care' to offer confirmation of delusion and mental illness - and to then proceed - as has happened in far too many cases - to instant chemicalisation of the individual and advice on how to be surgically altered AND even to surgery itself- in theory of course, since that 'alteration' will never change the sex of the person involved.

Madness on the face of it and the most vile abuse of minors in history.