Australian Politics Forum - Rapist Loses Again

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 135765
Gender: male

Rapist Loses Again
Feb 7^th, 2024 at 5:54am

Court rules Trump does not have immunity from 2020 election subversion prosecution

Criminal defendant/rapist Donald Trump is not immune from prosecution for alleged crimes he committed during his presidency to reverse the 2020 election results, a federal appeals court said Tuesday.

The ruling is a major blow to Trump’s key defense thus far in the federal election subversion case brought against him by special counsel Jack Smith. Trump faces four counts from the case, including conspiring to defraud the United States and to obstruct an official proceeding.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74116 Gender:	Re: Rapist Loses Again Reply #1 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 6:00am so much winning
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 135765 Gender:	Re: Rapist Loses Again Reply #2 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 7:52am John Smith wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 6:00am: so much winning Court case after court case after court case, loss after loss after loss. Which lawyer will quit today?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 135765
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #3 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:35am

Trump’s behavior after the 2020 election could be criminal: The judges made it clear that Trump's actions could be prosecuted in a court of law.

"Vital public interest" of letting trial proceed weighed heavily on the court: The judges cited the public interest in accountability for potential crimes committed by a former president, and how that overcame Trump’s argument that immunity was necessary to protect the institution of the presidency. They flatly rejected Trump’s claim that his criminal indictment would have a “chilling effect” on future administrations.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 101922 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Rapist Loses Again Reply #4 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:37am It's going to the Supreme Court where the Deep State is less in charge.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74116 Gender:	Re: Rapist Loses Again Reply #5 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:44am Bobby. wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:37am: It's going to the Supreme Court where the Deep State is less in charge. and what? You think the supreme court is going to rule that trump is exempt from following the laws of the USA? That their laws don't apply to him? Christ you're an idiot
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19995
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #6 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:51am

Bobby. wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:37am:

It's going to the Supreme Court where the Deep State is less in charge. Wink

No other court in the land has supported any of Trumps bullshit Bobby....The argument that the President of the United States is not subject to the laws of the land and can commit crimes without being held accountable is doomed to fail....This stunt is all about delaying the trial until after the 2024 election where Trump is hoping he can give himself a pardon!!!

Roll Eyes

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-legal-news-brief-even-in-unanimous-appeals-court-de...

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 135765
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #7 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:52am

The federal prosecution of a former President fits the case
“[w]hen judicial action is needed to serve broad public
interests” in order to “vindicate the public interest in an
ongoing criminal prosecution.” Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. at 754.
The risks of chilling Presidential action or permitting meritless,
harassing prosecutions are unlikely, unsupported by history
and “too remote and shadowy to shape the course of justice.”
See Clark, 289 U.S. at 16.

We therefore conclude that
functional policy considerations rooted in the structure of our
government do not immunize former Presidents from federal criminal prosecution.

Back to top

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19995
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #8 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:56am

John Smith wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:44am:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:37am:

It's going to the Supreme Court where the Deep State is less in charge. Wink

and what? You think the supreme court is going to rule that trump is exempt from following the laws of the USA? That their laws don't apply to him?

Christ you're an idiot

My guess is the Supreme Court will not hear the case and punt it back to Judge Chutkan who will then preside over Trumps criminal trial....Trump will try to delay as long as possible in the hope he can swindle the next election and pardon his own fat arse!!!

Huh

https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1754897292027424845

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19995
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #9 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 11:01am

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:52am:

The federal prosecution of a former President fits the case
“[w]hen judicial action is needed to serve broad public
interests” in order to “vindicate the public interest in an
ongoing criminal prosecution.” Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. at 754.
The risks of chilling Presidential action or permitting meritless,
harassing prosecutions are unlikely, unsupported by history
and “too remote and shadowy to shape the course of justice.”
See Clark, 289 U.S. at 16.

We therefore conclude that
functional policy considerations rooted in the structure of our
government do not immunize former Presidents from federal criminal prosecution.

Exactly....Expect some memes and abuse from the MAGA mob who will no doubt incite the fury of the scripture to pronounce Trump the Messiah....It's all they have left to argue???

Roll Eyes

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 135765
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #10 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:20pm

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 11:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:52am:

The federal prosecution of a former President fits the case
“[w]hen judicial action is needed to serve broad public
interests” in order to “vindicate the public interest in an
ongoing criminal prosecution.” Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. at 754.
The risks of chilling Presidential action or permitting meritless,
harassing prosecutions are unlikely, unsupported by history
and “too remote and shadowy to shape the course of justice.”
See Clark, 289 U.S. at 16.

We therefore conclude that
functional policy considerations rooted in the structure of our
government do not immunize former Presidents from federal criminal prosecution.

Exactly....Expect some memes and abuse from the MAGA mob who will no doubt incite the fury of the scripture to pronounce Trump the Messiah....It's all they have left to argue???

They've never had anything in the way of an argument.

They're just sore losers.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101922
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #11 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:33pm

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:56am:

John Smith wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:44am:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:37am:

It's going to the Supreme Court where the Deep State is less in charge. Wink

and what? You think the supreme court is going to rule that trump is exempt from following the laws of the USA? That their laws don't apply to him?

Christ you're an idiot

My guess is the Supreme Court will not hear the case and punt it back to Judge Chutkan who will then preside over Trumps criminal trial....Trump will try to delay as long as possible in the hope he can swindle the next election and pardon his own fat arse!!!

Huh

https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1754897292027424845

The Supreme Court will decide not you.

Harry Truman was never charged with dropping atomic bombs on women and children
at Hiroshima and Nagasaki - over 200,000 dead - vaporized -
no military target - clearly a war crime.
Presidents have immunity from their crimes.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 135765
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #12 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:38pm

Bobby. wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:33pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:56am:

John Smith wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:44am:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:37am:

It's going to the Supreme Court where the Deep State is less in charge. Wink

and what? You think the supreme court is going to rule that trump is exempt from following the laws of the USA? That their laws don't apply to him?

Christ you're an idiot

My guess is the Supreme Court will not hear the case and punt it back to Judge Chutkan who will then preside over Trumps criminal trial....Trump will try to delay as long as possible in the hope he can swindle the next election and pardon his own fat arse!!!

Huh

https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1754897292027424845

The Supreme Court will decide not you.

Harry Truman was never charged with dropping atomic bombs on women and children
at Hiroshima and Nagasaki - over 200,000 dead - vaporized -
no military target - clearly a war crime.
Presidents have immunity from their crimes.

So, if President Biden wants to have the orange rapist kidnapped & then illegally detained for the rest of his life in Guantanamo, he can do that and suffer no consequences?

If President Biden hires a hit man to whack Tucker Carlson, the POTUS will be immune from any prosecution?

Back to top

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19995
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #13 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:39pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:20pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 11:01am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:52am:

The federal prosecution of a former President fits the case
“[w]hen judicial action is needed to serve broad public
interests” in order to “vindicate the public interest in an
ongoing criminal prosecution.” Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. at 754.
The risks of chilling Presidential action or permitting meritless,
harassing prosecutions are unlikely, unsupported by history
and “too remote and shadowy to shape the course of justice.”
See Clark, 289 U.S. at 16.

We therefore conclude that
functional policy considerations rooted in the structure of our
government do not immunize former Presidents from federal criminal prosecution.

Exactly....Expect some memes and abuse from the MAGA mob who will no doubt incite the fury of the scripture to pronounce Trump the Messiah....It's all they have left to argue???

They've never had anything in the way of an argument.

They're just sore losers.

Yet they are so good at loosing every time their bullshit is tested in a court of law....The twice impeached ex President will go down in history as the most corrupt President to ever hold the office....When will people (MAGA) wake up to this flake???

Roll Eyes

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101922
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Rapist Loses Again
Reply #14 - Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:41pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:38pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 12:33pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:56am:

John Smith wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:44am:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 7^th, 2024 at 10:37am:

It's going to the Supreme Court where the Deep State is less in charge. Wink

and what? You think the supreme court is going to rule that trump is exempt from following the laws of the USA? That their laws don't apply to him?

Christ you're an idiot

My guess is the Supreme Court will not hear the case and punt it back to Judge Chutkan who will then preside over Trumps criminal trial....Trump will try to delay as long as possible in the hope he can swindle the next election and pardon his own fat arse!!!

Huh

https://twitter.com/justinbaragona/status/1754897292027424845

The Supreme Court will decide not you.

Harry Truman was never charged with dropping atomic bombs on women and children
at Hiroshima and Nagasaki - over 200,000 dead - vaporized -
no military target - clearly a war crime.
Presidents have immunity from their crimes.

So, if President Biden wants to have the orange rapist kidnapped & then illegally detained for the rest of his life in Guantanamo, he can do that and suffer no consequences?

If President Biden hires a hit man to whack Tucker Carlson, the POTUS will be immune from any prosecution?

Yep - the president was going to kill Julian Assange at one point.

Presidents are above the law - they can even murder people.

Back to top

IP Logged