Some background here:
However, while his rhetoric about the Supreme Court “chickening out” is certainly overblown,
the President is correct that it did not consider the evidence of fraud.
https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/donald-trump-says-judges...Donald Trump says judges have refused to look at the evidence of voter fraud. Is he right?
Donald Trump has a simple explanation for his repeated defeats in court. We went back through the judgments to see whether he’s right.
@SamClench
20 min read
If you have followed much news coverage of the US election and its aftermath, chances are you’ve read that President Donald Trump and his legal team have failed to prove their claims of widespread voter fraud in court.
Mr Trump has a simple explanation for that failure, and it’s worth considering.
According to the President, the problem is not a lack of evidence supporting his allegations. Rather, it’s that judges across the United States have refused to even look at the evidence, and have instead dismissed case after case based on legal technicalities.
This argument really came into focus last Friday, when the US Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit from Texas Attorney-General Ken Paxton.
Mr Trump had largely pinned his hopes of overturning the election result on that lawsuit, which he labelled “the big one” and “the case everyone has been waiting for”.
Reacting to the Supreme Court’s decision, Mr Trump said it had “zero interest in the merits” of Mr Paxton’s case and had “chickened out” of considering them.