Dnarever
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 57918
Here
Gender:
|
UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 15 th, 2024 at 2:41pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 14 th, 2024 at 9:51pm: UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 5 th, 2024 at 4:11pm: Dnarever wrote on Mar 4 th, 2024 at 9:17pm: You really do not think it silly to expect a significantly bigger crowd to turn up than you could get in Australia for the countries premium sport ?
For some context:
The US played Canada in a soccer game there in front of 35,000 spectators ?
Metallica, Guns and Roses, Billy Joel, Rolling Stones - between 35,000 and 44,000 I think it is very silly to expect Americans to embrace NRL games being played as a once-a-year thing in Las Vegas. Who knows? Maybe I am being a bit too hasty. We should judge the merits of the crowd attendance by what happens next year. Meanwhile, the lack of crowd enthusiasm, other than those actual rugby league fans that came over to watch the games, was noteworthy. Unless people were really that entertained by the games, I figure word of mouth will not get the locals to come out next year. By the way, if Metallica, Guns and Roses, Billy Joel, and the Rolling Stones could only attract a crowd of 35,000, then they really have no considerable fan support anymore. They can fit 96,000 Swifties in a stadium that is designed to seat up to 100,000. But only 35,000 for a stadium designed to seat 65,000. Did you know that they played this years superbowl there and didn't fill it ? $40 K fans for a RL game is a teriffic result, 61,000 people at the Super Bowl is basically capacity seating. That is 20,000 more than attended a couple of NRL games. I am not saying that 41,000 people in Las Vegas watching a couple of NRL games is not a good result. But, "terrific" would not be it. I bet at least 10,000 attendees -- 14,000, according to the Sydney Morning Herald -- were from Australia. 20,000+ locals watched. Reports were that a significant proportion of the remainder of the crowd were from other international countries that favour rugby league. Quote:61,000 people at the Super Bowl is basically capacity seating. 61K at a 65K stadium is capacity. They had unsold tickets. Still pretty good. Quote:But, "terrific" would not be it. I bet at least 10,000 attendees -- 14,000, according to the Sydney Morning Herald -- were from Australia. 20,000+ locals watched. Reports were that a significant proportion of the remainder of the crowd were from other international countries that favour rugby league. Is any of this relevant? 3 decades ago there would have been 25 people. 40K is great. As many as Guns and roses or the Stones.
|