Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 ... 84
Send Topic Print
foundations (Read 34550 times)
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12449
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #705 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:43am
 
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:00am:
The golden rule does not appear in the Koran


"He who saves a life, saves all mankind": Koran 5.32.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83724
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #706 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:04pm
 
One foundation of Western civilisation is the convention that no party would deliberately undermine democracy.....

Such out-dated reasoning, of course, is just the province of fools these days....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83724
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #707 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:06pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:04am:
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:02am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 10:54am:
The most universal maxim that enshrines morality, justice and fairness is, of course, the golden rule.

It appears, usually almost word for word, in every religious and cultural tradition that has ever existed.

It presupposes that individuals have a right to be treated morally, justly and fairly.

The golden rule does not appear in the Koran.
It is totally contrary to the conquering and world dominating reflex of Allah and Mohammed.

It appears multiple times in the Hadith.


Theory is a good thing ...... sometimes..... if a mistake is made, of course, in a theocratic government the god figure will always set it to rights in the after-life....  KEALASEO ... Kill 'Em All Let Allah Sort 'Em Out!
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83724
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #708 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:07pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:36am:
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 7:17am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 19th, 2024 at 4:13pm:
Morality, Justice, and Fairness  are ideas created in the human cortex brain, and therefore exist in nature's slaughter-house, ie,  since the appearance of homo sapiens c. 300K years ago, and developed over that time

They are concepts which are universally attractive to humans, at the abstract level. 

You can try arguing those three things are not universally attractive.....

In contrast to the delusional idea of 'natural individual rights' which didn't "exist in  nature" for most of that 300K years -  when humans were NOT at the top of the food chain in nature's slaughter-house.... a false concept which significantly  came into being during the enlightenment, as a result of men trying to find a basis for rule of law after the collapse of the 'Divine Right of Kings'.


So...
1. Morality, justice, fairness are ideas that were created in the brain (by whom/what? ) 300k years ago


In the cortex  brains of evolved homo sapiens, starting c.300k years ago.

Quote:
2. Nevertheless humans lived in a slaughterhouse all that time, under the divine right of kings


Humans consciously chose (and choose) to organize into  groups (tribes); divine right of kings was one method of administration of power, within the conditions of life on this planet, ie,  subject to nature's food chain  aka nature's slaughterhouse. 

Quote:
3. Then they wanted to get rid of the kings to get back to the 300k year old innate, natural ideas of morality, justice and fairness on the basis that these Ideas were created in each brain 300k years ago


People eventually wanted to be free of the power of kings; and ideas of morality, justice and fairness were developed over time, by philosophers, as a counter to
nature's (and king's) 'might is right', and a counter to the chaos resulting from the free operation of  individuals' instinctive, competitive, self-interested survival mechanisms.

But other ideas also arose in men's brains, eg 'natural individuals rights' - which were erroneoualy considered to exist in nature's slaughtehouse - a contradiction: nature's slaughterhouse doesn't recogize a "right to life".   

Quote:
4. But they were deluded because, after all, morality, justice, fairness in each brain is a delusion.


Now your errors are abounding: some ideas ARE delusional, as noted above, while others are not. 

'Fairness' - though not existing in nature's slaugherhouse, only in men's brains (spot the difference between "natural" cf. the ideas in human brains) - is an outcome desired by many humans; as is a "right to life", but while the former is  achievable, the latter cannot exist while humans choose to remain afflicted by their most persitent plague - warfare, the result of delusions like 'natural individual rights'.

A vicious circle , a catch-22, you have to let go of the delusion, to have a "right" to life.   

Quote:
5. Glorious Chinese common prosperity was invented my Mao, after reading Marx and Lenin, and the future is bright, happy and glorious.


Well ...Mao didn't invent it, but that is the vision; whether it is achieved is another thing altogether. Granting the privelege of money creation to the state would be a powerful force toward engendering shared prosperity.







Careful - you're wandering off into the uncharted wilds of free choice there.... is that by your own choosing or simply through force of pressure from reality?
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12449
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #709 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:08pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 7:38am:
While morality, justice and fairness are universal ideals, they have not arisen in a vacuum. They were/are abstract responses to primal human instincts.


Correct. The conscious mind reacting to unconscious instincts. 

Quote:
All high-order primates have some capacity to abstract and imagine future outcomes via possible courses of action in the present that include sexual- and acquisition-driven opportunism and deceit.


Yes. But only men create ideas to act as a basis for their social/political/economic organization in societies. 

Quote:
The rule of law and equality before the law are human responses to counter natural instincts.


Does equality before the law include entreched poverty? 

Quote:
As for individual rights, it's clear that they have been acknowledged as existing for many thousands of years - for at least as long as civilisation has existed.


Hammurabi (c.1750BC)  drew up the the first written laws relating to "justice", including eg, "an eye for an eye".

So "individual rights" need to be defined; I'm glad you left out "natural" - which the confused writers of the US  Constitution  used, in an attempt to find a basis for  "individual rights".   

Quote:
With the Ten Commandments, for example, Parents had the right to be respected by their children. Individuals had the right to be protected from murder. Individuals had the right to expect their property to be protected from theft. Individuals had the right to have their conjugal interests protected. Individuals had the right to defend themselves against deceit.


All desirable, but on what basis do those rights exist?

Quote:
What system of codified morality, justice, fairness, law and equality before the law could exclude the acknowledgement by default that individuals have rights?


Leave out "equality before the law" because we disagree on what it should achieve (eg eradication of poverty and war), and answer my previous question: on what basis do individual rights exist?

I would codify morality, justice and fairness -  in law  designed to engender shared prosperity and security.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:19pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83724
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #710 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:08pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:43am:
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:00am:
The golden rule does not appear in the Koran


"He who saves a life, saves all mankind": Koran 5.32.


So how does he who takes a life fit in?
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12449
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #711 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:09pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:04pm:
One foundation of Western civilisation is the convention that no party would deliberately undermine democracy.....

Such out-dated reasoning, of course, is just the province of fools these days....


Proving "democracy is the worst form of government...."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12449
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #712 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:17pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:07pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:36am:
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 7:17am:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 19th, 2024 at 4:13pm:
Morality, Justice, and Fairness  are ideas created in the human cortex brain, and therefore exist in nature's slaughter-house, ie,  since the appearance of homo sapiens c. 300K years ago, and developed over that time

They are concepts which are universally attractive to humans, at the abstract level. 

You can try arguing those three things are not universally attractive.....

In contrast to the delusional idea of 'natural individual rights' which didn't "exist in  nature" for most of that 300K years -  when humans were NOT at the top of the food chain in nature's slaughter-house.... a false concept which significantly  came into being during the enlightenment, as a result of men trying to find a basis for rule of law after the collapse of the 'Divine Right of Kings'.


So...
1. Morality, justice, fairness are ideas that were created in the brain (by whom/what? ) 300k years ago


In the cortex  brains of evolved homo sapiens, starting c.300k years ago.

Quote:
2. Nevertheless humans lived in a slaughterhouse all that time, under the divine right of kings


Humans consciously chose (and choose) to organize into  groups (tribes); divine right of kings was one method of administration of power, within the conditions of life on this planet, ie,  subject to nature's food chain  aka nature's slaughterhouse. 

Quote:
3. Then they wanted to get rid of the kings to get back to the 300k year old innate, natural ideas of morality, justice and fairness on the basis that these Ideas were created in each brain 300k years ago


People eventually wanted to be free of the power of kings; and ideas of morality, justice and fairness were developed over time, by philosophers, as a counter to
nature's (and king's) 'might is right', and a counter to the chaos resulting from the free operation of  individuals' instinctive, competitive, self-interested survival mechanisms.

But other ideas also arose in men's brains, eg 'natural individuals rights' - which were erroneoualy considered to exist in nature's slaughtehouse - a contradiction: nature's slaughterhouse doesn't recogize a "right to life".   

Quote:
4. But they were deluded because, after all, morality, justice, fairness in each brain is a delusion.


Now your errors are abounding: some ideas ARE delusional, as noted above, while others are not. 

'Fairness' - though not existing in nature's slaugherhouse, only in men's brains (spot the difference between "natural" cf. the ideas in human brains) - is an outcome desired by many humans; as is a "right to life", but while the former is  achievable, the latter cannot exist while humans choose to remain afflicted by their most persitent plague - warfare, the result of delusions like 'natural individual rights'.

A vicious circle , a catch-22, you have to let go of the delusion, to have a "right" to life.   

Quote:
5. Glorious Chinese common prosperity was invented my Mao, after reading Marx and Lenin, and the future is bright, happy and glorious.


Well ...Mao didn't invent it, but that is the vision; whether it is achieved is another thing altogether. Granting the privelege of money creation to the state would be a powerful force toward engendering shared prosperity.


Careful - you're wandering off into the uncharted wilds of free choice there.... is that by your own choosing or simply through force of pressure from reality?


It's because I agree with Cicero: "all must submit to rule of law, for all to be free".

My extensive reply to Frank explains WHY I believe rule of law designed to achieve shared prosperity and security is necessary, not "natural individual rights".   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 44483
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #713 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:17pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:43am:
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:00am:
The golden rule does not appear in the Koran


"He who saves a life, saves all mankind": Koran 5.32.



That is why We ordained for the Children of Israel that whoever takes a life—unless as a punishment for murder or mischief in the land—it will be as if they killed all of humanity; and whoever saves a life, it will be as if they saved all of humanity.


Not for Musulmans. For them the golden commandement was:
“Judgement Day will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews. The Jews will hide behind the stones and the trees, and the stones and the trees will say, oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew hiding behind me — come and kill him.”
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12449
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #714 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:21pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:08pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:43am:
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:00am:
The golden rule does not appear in the Koran


"He who saves a life, saves all mankind": Koran 5.32.


So how does he who takes a life fit in?


Contradictions exist in all scripture  - which is NOT "the Word Of God", but the words of men...

btw if you want to continue the debate on the foundations of ideas, don't forget to reply to my #704 (re which graps said I was  "straying into exercising free will" ...) 

Meantine poor FD - with his  brain blinded and crippled by ideology, has abandoned the debate, prefferring  a detour to criticism of the CCP....


Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:44pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 44483
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #715 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:22pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:08pm:
So "individual rights" need to be defined; I'm glad you left out "natural" - which the confused writers of the US  Constitution  used, in an attempt to find a basis for  "individual rights".   





Isn't the individual (lit. indivisible)  a natural unit? And arent his individual right and endowements and abilities and attributes his natural qualities?
Yes.

but you are prepared, even eager,  to say the most idiotic things just to have a misguided dig at ANYTHING not in line with the CCP's ideology.  Sad to see such complete mental subservience, even by a stupid bird.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 44483
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #716 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:30pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:17pm:
My extensive reply to Frank explains WHY I believe rule of law designed to achieve shared prosperity and security is necessary, not "natural individual rights".   



ONLY free individuals, coming together freely, can create laws that they all, individually and together, accept and submit to. THey will be equal before such laws, in defending their individual rights - there aren't any other - and surrendering to the judgemeent of such laws.

Common prosperity is a slogan that is manipulated by central committees and ideologues to mean whatever they want it to mean in order to coerce those who have not agreed to their authority and power to make laws for them - vis CCP and China. They put people in prison for simpy thinking for themseleves and saying it out loud. Common prosperity = don't think, do as you are told.




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12449
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #717 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:34pm
 
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:17pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:43am:
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:00am:
The golden rule does not appear in the Koran


"He who saves a life, saves all mankind": Koran 5.32.



That is why We ordained for the Children of Israel that whoever takes a life—unless as a punishment for murder or mischief in the land—it will be as if they killed all of humanity; and whoever saves a life, it will be as if they saved all of humanity.


Not for Musulmans. For them the golden commandement was:
“Judgement Day will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews. The Jews will hide behind the stones and the trees, and the stones and the trees will say, oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew hiding behind me — come and kill him.”


Doesn't refute the fact of Koran 5,32.

All  scripture is contradictory, as I explained to graps.

btw will you reply to #704 , or just ignore it?

If so, I will accept your concession.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:59pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 44483
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #718 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:38pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:21pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:08pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:43am:
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 11:00am:
The golden rule does not appear in the Koran


"He who saves a life, saves all mankind": Koran 5.32.


So how does he who takes a life fit in?


Contradictions exist in all scripture  - which is NOT "the Word Of God", but the words of men...



What are the contradictions in Mao Tse Tung Thought and Xi Ping Pong Thought?


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 12449
Gender: male
Re: foundations
Reply #719 - Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:48pm
 
Frank wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:22pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 12:08pm:
So "individual rights" need to be defined; I'm glad you left out "natural" - which the confused writers of the US  Constitution  used, in an attempt to find a basis for  "individual rights".   


Isn't the individual (lit. indivisible)  a natural unit?
 

Yes.

Quote:
And arent his individual right and endowements[/highlight] and abilities and attributes his natural qualities?
Yes.


Wrong. All explained for you in #704;  please address that post. 

Quote:
but you are prepared, even eager,  to say the most idiotic things just to have a misguided dig at ANYTHING not in line with the CCP's ideology.  Sad to see such complete mental subservience, even by a stupid bird.


That does not constitute a reply to #704.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 20th, 2024 at 1:03pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 ... 84
Send Topic Print