Frank wrote on Mar 20
th, 2024 at 1:10pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 20
th, 2024 at 12:48pm:
Wrong. All explained for you in #704; please address that post.
It's confused bollocks. Natural individual right are erroneous - your common prosperity is correct.
Wrong again; common prosperty MAY be achievable, whereas delusional 'natural individual rights' entrenches warfare (the persistent human plague, throughout history).
Quote:But you do not explain why other than introducing moronic slogans like 'nature's slaughter house', slogans befitting mao's little red book chanting slogans.
Er.... the food chain on earth is not a "slogan", and indeed continuous warfare makes a mockery of the individual's "right" to life.
Quote:If morality and fairness are natural,....
Did you miss it in #704? Morality and fairness exist in men's cortex brains, but the natural world - manifested in the food chain - doesn't give two hoots about such ideas, nor to "individual natural rights". Nature is only concerned with the propagation of life in the aggregate, not the "rights" of individuals.
Quote: ...but how is individual rights not natural. And if the idea of Common prosperioty is natural, why is individual prosperity not? What constitites the 'common', after all, if not the individuals?
Your error explained above: ideas in men's brains may or may not be based in the realities of life on this planet; whether such ideas are "natural" or not requires a definition of natural, because "rights" - like "morality/justice/fairness" don't exist in nature, only in men's brains.