Yadda
|
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT....... During the absence of their own children [who were all under 8 yrs old], .....the parents had no knowledge of where their children were. ......and apparently, they had no care to know. .......otherwise they would have reported them missing?
[If the children were 'missing' from school, wouldn't the school have a LEGAL obligation to notify the parents that their children were missing/absent from school ???? ]
BUT/WHEREAS....... .....as soon as the parents find out [their children have been a nuisance to someone else - AND BECAUSE THEY WERE 'APPREHENDED'].........the parents then pretend that they care about their children's safety ????
Surely, that is what it looks like ? .......THE PARENTS CHOOSE TO, PUBLICLY, MAKE A 'GRIEVANCE' COMPLAINT......against the person who 'found' their children.
Q. And why weren't the children subsequently, immediately taken into the care of the state ?
Such an action [by the state], being legally justified, on the presumed basis, of the apparent abandonment of these children, by their parents ?
And, .......why weren't the parents charged with abandonment, of their children ?
[How can their parents claim, that they have not abandoned their children ?]
nuisance = = a person or thing causing inconvenience or annoyance. an act which is harmful or offensive to the public or a member of it and for which there is a legal remedy.
|