Australian Politics Forum - "Racism" is a social construct without evidence

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

"Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #1 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:31pm

The whole of the human world is socially constructed, so to say that race is socially constructed says not much.

Language, history, science, biology, knowledge itself, manners, literature, diet, and the rest of it - all socially constructed. Ethnicity is socially onstructed and carries most of the cultural annotations of race.

While there is a clear hierarchy of ethnicities/cultures, there is also assimilation into a culture/ethncity, easier into some than others. So while you cannot change yourself from white to black, you can become a black professor of Asian or English literature and history, say.

You inherit both your racial characteristics and your ethnic/cultural characteristics. You can change the latter but not the former.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 11134 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #2 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:59pm You inherit both your ethnic characteristics and your cultural characteristics. You can change the latter to a large degree but not the former.
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #3 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 4:27pm

Soren, unexpectantly you are only half accepting the message I am delivering. Hardly surprising, really because to fully accept it would demolish your heart's belief in "Race" as being inherently different. To you, if a person is Black/Asian/Amerindian, Indian, anything other than White, European, they are automatically inferior. Such foolishness, all based on a socially constructed falsehood that different "races" are well, different. If your son brought home an Indigenous Australian you'd be asking why he bothered. You wouldn't appreciate her for herself, you'd be asking questions about her skin colour. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #4 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 6:58pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:59pm:

You inherit both your ethnic characteristics and your cultural characteristics. You can change the latter to a large degree but not the former.

I take ethnicity to be cultural. An ethic German, Check, Pole, Dane are racially indistinguishable. Culturally, historically etc they are quite different. They can assimilate into each other's cultures within a lifetime.

A Nigerian born in any of these countries may be very assimilated but as a black African he will be aware that he is not German, Dane, Pole etc even if he speaks only German, Danish etc.

There is a lot more complexity to this than DNA or biology.

One reason, and not the only one, is that like every other social construct, ethnicities, cultures ARE hierarchical. Not all cultures are equal, not all cultural comparisons are neutral or non-hierarchical. Social construct means hierarchy. So if ethnicity, culture, race, knowledge, art etc, etc are social constructs then they are hierarchical.
Discerning means telling the difference. Telling the difference means rank order.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #5 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:14pm

Frank wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:59pm:

You inherit both your ethnic characteristics and your cultural characteristics. You can change the latter to a large degree but not the former.

I take ethnicity to be cultural. An ethic German, Check, Pole, Dane are racially indistinguishable. Culturally, historically etc they are quite different. They can assimilate into each other's cultures within a lifetime.

A Nigerian born in any of these countries may be very assimilated but as a black African he will be aware that he is not German, Dane, Pole etc even if he speaks only German, Danish etc.

There is a lot more complexity to this than DNA or biology.

One reason, and not the only one, is that like every other social construct, ethnicities, cultures ARE hierarchical. Not all cultures are equal, not all cultural comparisons are neutral or non-hierarchical. Social construct means hierarchy. So if ethnicity, culture, race, knowledge, art etc, etc are social constructs then they are hierarchical.
Discerning means telling the difference. Telling the difference means rank order.

As soon as foreign people, who emigrated from their homeland after their late teens, speak they will be identified as foreigners.

Accents are evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently physiologically.

People who speak a second language will tell you that they cannot think a certain way unless they're thinking in their first language.

This is evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently psychologically.

Immigrants can assimilate to a large degree, but rarely if ever, completely.

And, by the way, the ethnic and cultural German may think he's assimilated into Czech society but, as sure as sh!t ain't sugar, the Czech knows what a German is.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bias_2012

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10640
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #6 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:28pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:14pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:59pm:

You inherit both your ethnic characteristics and your cultural characteristics. You can change the latter to a large degree but not the former.

I take ethnicity to be cultural. An ethic German, Check, Pole, Dane are racially indistinguishable. Culturally, historically etc they are quite different. They can assimilate into each other's cultures within a lifetime.

A Nigerian born in any of these countries may be very assimilated but as a black African he will be aware that he is not German, Dane, Pole etc even if he speaks only German, Danish etc.

There is a lot more complexity to this than DNA or biology.

One reason, and not the only one, is that like every other social construct, ethnicities, cultures ARE hierarchical. Not all cultures are equal, not all cultural comparisons are neutral or non-hierarchical. Social construct means hierarchy. So if ethnicity, culture, race, knowledge, art etc, etc are social constructs then they are hierarchical.
Discerning means telling the difference. Telling the difference means rank order.

As soon as foreign people, who emigrated from their homeland after their late teens, speak they will be identified as foreigners.

Accents are evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently physiologically.

People who speak a second language will tell you that they cannot think a certain way unless they're thinking in their first language.

This is evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently psychologically.

Immigrants can assimilate to a large degree, but rarely if ever, completely.

And, by the way, the ethnic and cultural German may think he's assimilated into Czech society but, as sure as sh!t ain't sugar, the Czech knows what a German is.

That's correct ... and those differences will determine their personality and character in the new country

Back to top

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #7 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:51pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:14pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:59pm:

You inherit both your ethnic characteristics and your cultural characteristics. You can change the latter to a large degree but not the former.

I take ethnicity to be cultural. An ethic German, Check, Pole, Dane are racially indistinguishable. Culturally, historically etc they are quite different. They can assimilate into each other's cultures within a lifetime.

A Nigerian born in any of these countries may be very assimilated but as a black African he will be aware that he is not German, Dane, Pole etc even if he speaks only German, Danish etc.

There is a lot more complexity to this than DNA or biology.

One reason, and not the only one, is that like every other social construct, ethnicities, cultures ARE hierarchical. Not all cultures are equal, not all cultural comparisons are neutral or non-hierarchical. Social construct means hierarchy. So if ethnicity, culture, race, knowledge, art etc, etc are social constructs then they are hierarchical.
Discerning means telling the difference. Telling the difference means rank order.

As soon as foreign people, who emigrated from their homeland after their late teens, speak they will be identified as foreigners.

Accents are evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently physiologically.

People who speak a second language will tell you that they cannot think a certain way unless they're thinking in their first language.

This is evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently psychologically.

Immigrants can assimilate to a large degree, but rarely if ever, completely.

And, by the way, the ethnic and cultural German may think he's assimilated into Czech society but, as sure as sh!t ain't sugar, the Czech knows what a German is.

Up to a point, Lord Copper.

Poles and Germans, Danes and Swedes, Germans and Dutch have lived side by side for centuries. They are acutely aware of their differences by they also have centuries of coexistence.

Germans and Turks, Somalis and Danes, Swedes and Iraqis do not.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #8 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 9:05pm

Frank wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:14pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:59pm:

You inherit both your ethnic characteristics and your cultural characteristics. You can change the latter to a large degree but not the former.

I take ethnicity to be cultural. An ethic German, Check, Pole, Dane are racially indistinguishable. Culturally, historically etc they are quite different. They can assimilate into each other's cultures within a lifetime.

A Nigerian born in any of these countries may be very assimilated but as a black African he will be aware that he is not German, Dane, Pole etc even if he speaks only German, Danish etc.

There is a lot more complexity to this than DNA or biology.

One reason, and not the only one, is that like every other social construct, ethnicities, cultures ARE hierarchical. Not all cultures are equal, not all cultural comparisons are neutral or non-hierarchical. Social construct means hierarchy. So if ethnicity, culture, race, knowledge, art etc, etc are social constructs then they are hierarchical.
Discerning means telling the difference. Telling the difference means rank order.

As soon as foreign people, who emigrated from their homeland after their late teens, speak they will be identified as foreigners.

Accents are evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently physiologically.

People who speak a second language will tell you that they cannot think a certain way unless they're thinking in their first language.

This is evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently psychologically.

Immigrants can assimilate to a large degree, but rarely if ever, completely.

And, by the way, the ethnic and cultural German may think he's assimilated into Czech society but, as sure as sh!t ain't sugar, the Czech knows what a German is.

Up to a point, Lord Copper.

Poles and Germans, Danes and Swedes, Germans and Dutch have lived side by side for centuries. They are acutely aware of their differences by they also have centuries of coexistence.

Germans and Turks, Somalis and Danes, Swedes and Iraqis do not.

The Ottoman Turks and Imperial Germany had close ties since the 19th century and were allies in WW1, Turkey maintained friendly ties and a trade relationship with Nazi Germany in WW2.

Germany is Turkey's closest ally in Europe.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #9 - Mar 7^th, 2024 at 9:07pm

I notice, Soren that you seem to have finally accepted there are no major Genetic differences between the various "races". Good. Now you are concentrating on Ethic and Cultural differences. However those differences are not Genetic. They are social constructs. As social constructs they can be changed by individuals if they so wish. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #10 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:49am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 9:05pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 7:14pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 6:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:59pm:

You inherit both your ethnic characteristics and your cultural characteristics. You can change the latter to a large degree but not the former.

I take ethnicity to be cultural. An ethic German, Check, Pole, Dane are racially indistinguishable. Culturally, historically etc they are quite different. They can assimilate into each other's cultures within a lifetime.

A Nigerian born in any of these countries may be very assimilated but as a black African he will be aware that he is not German, Dane, Pole etc even if he speaks only German, Danish etc.

There is a lot more complexity to this than DNA or biology.

One reason, and not the only one, is that like every other social construct, ethnicities, cultures ARE hierarchical. Not all cultures are equal, not all cultural comparisons are neutral or non-hierarchical. Social construct means hierarchy. So if ethnicity, culture, race, knowledge, art etc, etc are social constructs then they are hierarchical.
Discerning means telling the difference. Telling the difference means rank order.

As soon as foreign people, who emigrated from their homeland after their late teens, speak they will be identified as foreigners.

Accents are evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently physiologically.

People who speak a second language will tell you that they cannot think a certain way unless they're thinking in their first language.

This is evidence that your cultural milieu alters you permanently psychologically.

Immigrants can assimilate to a large degree, but rarely if ever, completely.

And, by the way, the ethnic and cultural German may think he's assimilated into Czech society but, as sure as sh!t ain't sugar, the Czech knows what a German is.

Up to a point, Lord Copper.

Poles and Germans, Danes and Swedes, Germans and Dutch have lived side by side for centuries. They are acutely aware of their differences by they also have centuries of coexistence.

Germans and Turks, Somalis and Danes, Swedes and Iraqis do not.

The Ottoman Turks and Imperial Germany had close ties since the 19th century and were allies in WW1, Turkey maintained friendly ties and a trade relationship with Nazi Germany in WW2.

Germany is Turkey's closest ally in Europe.

It doesn't mean they couldn't tell each other apart. Trade relatioethnic or cultural differences disappear.

Anyway, I wonder what Sam Kerr means when she said to the cop, 'Stupid white cop". A white person would never say that to another. She obviously used is as a racial epithet.
What is the objectionable word out of those three? It is not 'cop' (she says she didn't call him bastard). It must be either stupid or white or both.

What if someone said 'it was a stupid half-Indian thing for her to say to a white person".
Could she or anyone else object to such a formulation?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #11 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:50am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 9:07pm:

I notice, Soren that you seem to have finally accepted there are no major Genetic differences between the various "races". Good. Now you are concentrating on Ethic and Cultural differences. However those differences are not Genetic. They are social constructs. As social constructs they can be changed by individuals if they so wish. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:25am by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

JC Denton Gold Member Offline Posts: 5459 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #12 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:58am hey brian did you go crying to freediver to get my signature with your embarrassing self-own quotation removed?
Back to top	IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #13 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:14am

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:49am:

Anyway, I wonder what Sam Kerr means when she said to the cop, 'Stupid white cop". A white person would never say that to another. She obviously used is as a racial epithet.
What is the objectionable word out of those three? It is not 'cop' (she says she didn't call him bastard). It must be either stupid or white or both.

What if someone said 'it was a stupid half-Indian thing for her to say to a white person".
Could she or anyone else object to such a formulation?

The black/white 'race' thing is an Americanism - promoted globally by easily the dumbest f~cks in the Anglosphere.

Case in point: Hispanics being characterised as 'white'.

No European characterises each other as white in Europe when referring to themselves, any more than Africans do about themselves in Africa - something that comes as a genuine shock to African-Americans who emigrate there.

Australian culture is particularly susceptible to Americanisms, so it shouldn't be much of a surprise when our dumb f~cks imitate American dumb f~cks.

As for Kerr, insofar as her Indian heritage influences her, she is very much expressing the Indian obsession with skin colour.

Back to top

IP Logged

JC Denton

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5459
Gender: female

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #14 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:19am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:14am:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:49am:

Anyway, I wonder what Sam Kerr means when she said to the cop, 'Stupid white cop". A white person would never say that to another. She obviously used is as a racial epithet.
What is the objectionable word out of those three? It is not 'cop' (she says she didn't call him bastard). It must be either stupid or white or both.

What if someone said 'it was a stupid half-Indian thing for her to say to a white person".
Could she or anyone else object to such a formulation?

The black/white 'race' thing is an Americanism - promoted globally by easily the dumbest f~cks in the Anglosphere.

Case in point: Hispanics being characterised as 'white'.

No European characterises each other as white in Europe when referring to themselves, any more than Africans do about themselves in Africa - something that comes as a genuine shock to African-Americans who emigrate there.

Australian culture is particularly susceptible to Americanisms, so it shouldn't be much of a surprise when our dumb f~cks imitate American dumb f~cks.

hispanics arent characterised as white, 'hispanic' is a census category in the u.s that pertains specifically to linguistic/cultural origin; you can nominate other ethnic categories in addition to 'hispanic', hence 'non-white hispanic %' and 'white hispanic %'. hispanics can be white or any other racial category depending on their nomination

https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/ethnicity/#:~:text...

yet another post where you don't know what you're talking about but could have spent two seconds googling beforehand instead

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #15 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:45am

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:19am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:14am:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:49am:

Anyway, I wonder what Sam Kerr means when she said to the cop, 'Stupid white cop". A white person would never say that to another. She obviously used is as a racial epithet.
What is the objectionable word out of those three? It is not 'cop' (she says she didn't call him bastard). It must be either stupid or white or both.

What if someone said 'it was a stupid half-Indian thing for her to say to a white person".
Could she or anyone else object to such a formulation?

The black/white 'race' thing is an Americanism - promoted globally by easily the dumbest f~cks in the Anglosphere.

Case in point: Hispanics being characterised as 'white'.

No European characterises each other as white in Europe when referring to themselves, any more than Africans do about themselves in Africa - something that comes as a genuine shock to African-Americans who emigrate there.

Australian culture is particularly susceptible to Americanisms, so it shouldn't be much of a surprise when our dumb f~cks imitate American dumb f~cks.

hispanics arent characterised as white, 'hispanic' is a census category in the u.s that pertains specifically to linguistic/cultural origin; you can nominate other ethnic categories in addition to 'hispanic', hence 'non-white hispanic %' and 'white hispanic %'. hispanics can be white or any other racial category depending on their nomination

https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/ethnicity/#:~:text...

yet another post where you don't know what you're talking about but could have spent two seconds googling beforehand instead

As one of our local bitchy dumb f~cks who spends time looking for ways to use the N-word, stop using your fingers to play with your arsehole and try googling why many Hispanics identify themselves as white on the US census.

Look for the definition of 'white' as a socio-economic, political, or vaguely European (and apologies to southern Europeans) or patriotic definition as opposed to it being a 'racial' one.

Back to top

IP Logged

JC Denton

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5459
Gender: female

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #16 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:13am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:45am:

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:19am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:14am:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:49am:

Anyway, I wonder what Sam Kerr means when she said to the cop, 'Stupid white cop". A white person would never say that to another. She obviously used is as a racial epithet.
What is the objectionable word out of those three? It is not 'cop' (she says she didn't call him bastard). It must be either stupid or white or both.

What if someone said 'it was a stupid half-Indian thing for her to say to a white person".
Could she or anyone else object to such a formulation?

The black/white 'race' thing is an Americanism - promoted globally by easily the dumbest f~cks in the Anglosphere.

Case in point: Hispanics being characterised as 'white'.

No European characterises each other as white in Europe when referring to themselves, any more than Africans do about themselves in Africa - something that comes as a genuine shock to African-Americans who emigrate there.

Australian culture is particularly susceptible to Americanisms, so it shouldn't be much of a surprise when our dumb f~cks imitate American dumb f~cks.

hispanics arent characterised as white, 'hispanic' is a census category in the u.s that pertains specifically to linguistic/cultural origin; you can nominate other ethnic categories in addition to 'hispanic', hence 'non-white hispanic %' and 'white hispanic %'. hispanics can be white or any other racial category depending on their nomination

https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/ethnicity/#:~:text...

yet another post where you don't know what you're talking about but could have spent two seconds googling beforehand instead

As one of our local bitchy dumb f~cks who spends time looking for ways to use the N-word, stop using your fingers to play with your arsehole and try googling why many Hispanics identify themselves as white on the US census.

Look for the definition of 'white' as a socio-economic, political, or vaguely European (and apologies to southern Europeans) or patriotic definition as opposed to it being a 'racial' one.

because many of them are in fact to a great extent ancestrally european you f_cking idiot, which is literally what 'white' conceptually is synonymous with - holy sh1t you absolute f_cking spasticated c_nt.

this is a dude who literally tried to speculate that a few meaningless zingers from the head of state of mongolia were a suggestive precusor for serious international tensions in eurasia

you're like thegreatdivide with a few iq points on top, i honestly find it difficult to distinguish between you and him sometimes you're both so unimaginably generic and retarded

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:20am by JC Denton »

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #17 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:14am

Australia was the Galapagos Islands of human racial differences. Aborigines remained as primitive in the 18th century as they were when they arrived from India or Asia in 40,000 bc.
The human development elsewhere on the planes was as astonishing by comparison as the total lack of development by Aborigines - and a few other pockets of similarly primitive prehostoric humans in the Amazon, Borneo, Papaua.
Tasmania is at the 42 latitude South, mirroring Rome and the mediterrenean or northern China, Korea and Japan at 42 degrees North. Forty thousands years ago everyone around the globe was as primitive as each other, with no discernible differences. Aborigines stayed excatly the same while the rest of the world moved on. That is astonishing.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

JC Denton

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5459
Gender: female

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #18 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:27am

as i like to say, they were probably less culturally accomplished than beavers are. if you raise a beaver in an animal hospital - even if it hasn't seen a forest or a running stream in its life, it will pile up objects in the hallways of the hospital in an attempt to construct a dam. beavers literally have more of an industrious spirit and work ethic than aboriginals do

https://pethelpful.com/pet-news/beaver-builds-dam

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #19 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:50am

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:13am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:45am:

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:19am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:14am:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:49am:

Anyway, I wonder what Sam Kerr means when she said to the cop, 'Stupid white cop". A white person would never say that to another. She obviously used is as a racial epithet.
What is the objectionable word out of those three? It is not 'cop' (she says she didn't call him bastard). It must be either stupid or white or both.

What if someone said 'it was a stupid half-Indian thing for her to say to a white person".
Could she or anyone else object to such a formulation?

The black/white 'race' thing is an Americanism - promoted globally by easily the dumbest f~cks in the Anglosphere.

Case in point: Hispanics being characterised as 'white'.

No European characterises each other as white in Europe when referring to themselves, any more than Africans do about themselves in Africa - something that comes as a genuine shock to African-Americans who emigrate there.

Australian culture is particularly susceptible to Americanisms, so it shouldn't be much of a surprise when our dumb f~cks imitate American dumb f~cks.

hispanics arent characterised as white, 'hispanic' is a census category in the u.s that pertains specifically to linguistic/cultural origin; you can nominate other ethnic categories in addition to 'hispanic', hence 'non-white hispanic %' and 'white hispanic %'. hispanics can be white or any other racial category depending on their nomination

https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/ethnicity/#:~:text...

yet another post where you don't know what you're talking about but could have spent two seconds googling beforehand instead

As one of our local bitchy dumb f~cks who spends time looking for ways to use the N-word, stop using your fingers to play with your arsehole and try googling why many Hispanics identify themselves as white on the US census.

Look for the definition of 'white' as a socio-economic, political, or vaguely European (and apologies to southern Europeans) or patriotic definition as opposed to it being a 'racial' one.

because many of them are in fact to a great extent ancestrally european you f_cking idiot, which is literally what 'white' conceptually is synonymous with - holy sh1t you absolute f_cking spasticated c_nt.

this is a dude who literally tried to speculate that a few meaningless zingers from the head of state of mongolia were a suggestive precusor for serious international tensions in eurasia

you're like thegreatdivide with a few iq points on top, i honestly find it difficult to distinguish between you and him sometimes you're both so unimaginably generic and retarded

Take your fingers out of your arsehole (you'll have to hope it's not a tumour) and use them to google.

Usually, Hispanics who identify as 'white' are not light-skinned and/or fair-haired.

'White' in the US is a term that is used to indicate socio-economic status, social privilege, political alignment, and/or patriotism.

Where it is used to indicate 'race', it is used in a way no European would use it.

Back to top

IP Logged

JC Denton

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5459
Gender: female

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #20 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:58am

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:50am:

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:13am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:45am:

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:19am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:14am:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:49am:

Anyway, I wonder what Sam Kerr means when she said to the cop, 'Stupid white cop". A white person would never say that to another. She obviously used is as a racial epithet.
What is the objectionable word out of those three? It is not 'cop' (she says she didn't call him bastard). It must be either stupid or white or both.

What if someone said 'it was a stupid half-Indian thing for her to say to a white person".
Could she or anyone else object to such a formulation?

The black/white 'race' thing is an Americanism - promoted globally by easily the dumbest f~cks in the Anglosphere.

Case in point: Hispanics being characterised as 'white'.

No European characterises each other as white in Europe when referring to themselves, any more than Africans do about themselves in Africa - something that comes as a genuine shock to African-Americans who emigrate there.

Australian culture is particularly susceptible to Americanisms, so it shouldn't be much of a surprise when our dumb f~cks imitate American dumb f~cks.

hispanics arent characterised as white, 'hispanic' is a census category in the u.s that pertains specifically to linguistic/cultural origin; you can nominate other ethnic categories in addition to 'hispanic', hence 'non-white hispanic %' and 'white hispanic %'. hispanics can be white or any other racial category depending on their nomination

https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-question/ethnicity/#:~:text...

yet another post where you don't know what you're talking about but could have spent two seconds googling beforehand instead

As one of our local bitchy dumb f~cks who spends time looking for ways to use the N-word, stop using your fingers to play with your arsehole and try googling why many Hispanics identify themselves as white on the US census.

Look for the definition of 'white' as a socio-economic, political, or vaguely European (and apologies to southern Europeans) or patriotic definition as opposed to it being a 'racial' one.

because many of them are in fact to a great extent ancestrally european you f_cking idiot, which is literally what 'white' conceptually is synonymous with - holy sh1t you absolute f_cking spasticated c_nt.

this is a dude who literally tried to speculate that a few meaningless zingers from the head of state of mongolia were a suggestive precusor for serious international tensions in eurasia

you're like thegreatdivide with a few iq points on top, i honestly find it difficult to distinguish between you and him sometimes you're both so unimaginably generic and retarded

Take your fingers out of your arsehole (you'll have to hope it's not a tumour) and use them to google.

Usually, Hispanics who identify as 'white' are not light-skinned and/or fair-haired.

'White' in the US is a term that is used to indicate socio-economic status, social privilege, political alignment, and/or patriotism.

Where it is used to indicate 'race', it is used in a way no European would use it.

"white skinned" doesnt necessarily imply ancestry c_nt; look at sam kerr, total street sh_tter phenotype despite being half european genetically

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289685/#:~:text=Patterns%20of%20Ge...

Quote:

Patterns of Genetic Ancestry of Self-Reported Latinos Latinos encompass nearly all possible combinations of African, Native American, and European ancestries, with the exception of individuals who have a mix of African and Native American ancestry without European ancestry (see Figures S4A and S1). On average, we estimate that Latinos in the US carry 18.0% Native American ancestry, 65.1% European ancestry, and 6.2% African ancestry. We find the highest levels of estimated Native American ancestry in self-reported Latinos from states in the Southwest, especially those bordering Mexico (Figure 2C). We find the highest mean levels of African ancestry in Latinos living in or born in states in the South, especially Louisiana, the Midwest, and Atlantic (Figure 2A). Further stratification of individuals by their self-reported population affiliation (e.g., “Mexican,” “Puerto Rican,” or “Dominican”) reveals a diversity in genetic ancestry, consistent with previous work studying these populations (see Figure S5 and Table S5).10,20,24,25,68,69 We find that Latinos who, besides reporting as “Hispanic,” also self-report as Mexican or Central American, carry more Native American ancestry than Latinos overall; those also who self-report as black, Puerto Rican, or Dominican have higher levels of African ancestry; and those who additionally self-report as white, Cuban, or South American have on average higher levels of European ancestry.

every single f_cking thing you say is so orthogonal with reality and basic common sense it just begs absolute belief

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #21 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 10:15am

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:58am:

"white skinned" doesnt necessarily imply ancestry

Yes, that's what I said. You're proof that anal sex fiddles with the mind.

'White' in the US is a term that has morphed into a term to indicate socio-economic status, social privilege, political alignment, and/or patriotism.

However, most Americans and those in the Anglosphere still presume it refers to 'race' and in Australia, it is used to refer to nothing but 'race'.

'Hispanic' is a term that means different things to Americans depending on their geolocation.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #22 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:08am

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, boys you seem to be accepting my point and trying to turn it to your own ends. There are no major differences Genetically between the so-called "races". Geneticists would laugh themselves silly reading the bullshit you post, you really are foolish in the extreme. Go home, you're wasting all our time with your outmoded belief in the "races". They do not exist. All the "Races" are identical Genetically. Any differences are superficial and meaningless. Children. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #23 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:32am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, boys you seem to be accepting my point and trying to turn it to your own ends. There are no major differences Genetically between the so-called "races". Geneticists would laugh themselves silly reading the bullshit you post, you really are foolish in the extreme. Go home, you're wasting all our time with your outmoded belief in the "races". They do not exist. All the "Races" are identical Genetically. Any differences are superficial and meaningless. Children. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

I'm not arguing that 'race' exists. I'm not sure others are either.

What does exist is the tenacious longevity of its underlying pseudoscience even in the face of its debunking - akin to religious dogma.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #24 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:57am

Most human differences have nothing to do with science. That race is not genetic is largely irrelevant. What does exist and remains relevant is the perception of racial differences EVEN IF there is no DNA difference. It just means that DNA is irrelevant.

You can substitute European for white. What matters is that it was Europeans who discovered, colonised, described and studied the world beyond their own little tribal patches, starting with the Greeks who colonised the entire Mediterreanenan and first drew attention to the noticable difference between themselves and the barbarians they met. They were not talking about DNA but the differences were still obvious and undeniable.

Europeans discovered and civilised - shaped after their own civilisation - the Americas, Australia, Africa and much of Asia, not the other way around. How Europeans developed, within about three thousand years, to such a world dominating significance is interesting and next to the 60,000 years of aboriginal history of totally static itrelevance is astonishing. The rest of the 'barbarians' are somewhere on the scale between these two poles of human development, some closer to Europeans, some to Aborigines.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #25 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:01pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:32am:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, boys you seem to be accepting my point and trying to turn it to your own ends. There are no major differences Genetically between the so-called "races". Geneticists would laugh themselves silly reading the bullshit you post, you really are foolish in the extreme. Go home, you're wasting all our time with your outmoded belief in the "races". They do not exist. All the "Races" are identical Genetically. Any differences are superficial and meaningless. Children. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

I'm not arguing that 'race' exists. I'm not sure others are either.

What does exist is the tenacious longevity of its underlying pseudoscience even in the face of its debunking - akin to religious dogma.

Oh, definitely, definitely. I have been arguing against the likes of Soren for over ten or more years. He is the worst, he seems to definitely believe in his Racism on the basis of differences between the "Races". Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #26 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:12pm

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:57am:

Most human differences have nothing to do with science. That race is not genetic is largely irrelevant. What does exist and remains relevant is the perception of racial differences EVEN IF there is no DNA difference. It just means that DNA is irrelevant.

You can substitute European for white. What matters is that it was Europeans who discovered, colonised, described and studied the world beyond their own little tribal patches, starting with the Greeks who colonised the entire Mediterreanenan and first drew attention to the noticable difference between themselves and the barbarians they met. They were not talking about DNA but the differences were still obvious and undeniable.

Europeans discovered and civilised - shaped after their own civilisation - the Americas, Australia, Africa and much of Asia, not the other way around. How Europeans developed, within about three thousand years, to such a world dominating significance is interesting and next to the 60,000 years of aboriginal history of totally static itrelevance is astonishing. The rest of the 'barbarians' are somewhere on the scale between these two poles of human development, some closer to Europeans, some to Aborigines.

Great African societies

1. The Kingdom of Kush
2. The Land of Punt
3. Carthage
4. The Kingdom of Aksum
5. The Mali Empire
6. The Songhai Empire
7. The Great Zimbabwe

Great Asian societies

1. Mesopotamian Civilisation
2. Persian Civilisation
3. Indus Valley Civilisation
4. Chinese Civilisation

Great pre-European American societies

1. Olmec
2. Teotihuacan
3. Mayas
4. Zapotecs
5. Mixtecs
6. Huastecs
7. Purepecha
8. Toltecs
9. Mexica/Aztecs

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #27 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:20pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:12pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:57am:

Most human differences have nothing to do with science. That race is not genetic is largely irrelevant. What does exist and remains relevant is the perception of racial differences EVEN IF there is no DNA difference. It just means that DNA is irrelevant.

You can substitute European for white. What matters is that it was Europeans who discovered, colonised, described and studied the world beyond their own little tribal patches, starting with the Greeks who colonised the entire Mediterreanenan and first drew attention to the noticable difference between themselves and the barbarians they met. They were not talking about DNA but the differences were still obvious and undeniable.

Europeans discovered and civilised - shaped after their own civilisation - the Americas, Australia, Africa and much of Asia, not the other way around. How Europeans developed, within about three thousand years, to such a world dominating significance is interesting and next to the 60,000 years of aboriginal history of totally static itrelevance is astonishing. The rest of the 'barbarians' are somewhere on the scale between these two poles of human development, some closer to Europeans, some to Aborigines.

Great African societies

1. The Kingdom of Kush
2. The Land of Punt
3. Carthage
4. The Kingdom of Aksum
5. The Mali Empire
6. The Songhai Empire
7. The Great Zimbabwe

Great Asian societies

1. Mesopotamian Civilisation
2. Persian Civilisation
3. Indus Valley Civilisation
4. Chinese Civilisation

Great pre-European American societies

1. Olmec
2. Teotihuacan
3. Mayas
4. Zapotecs
5. Mixtecs
6. Huastecs
7. Purepecha
8. Toltecs
9. Mexica/Aztecs

You only know abut them from Europeans.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Bias_2012

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10640
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #28 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:22pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, boys you seem to be accepting my point and trying to turn it to your own ends. There are no major differences Genetically between the so-called "races". Geneticists would laugh themselves silly reading the bullshit you post, you really are foolish in the extreme. Go home, you're wasting all our time with your outmoded belief in the "races". They do not exist. All the "Races" are identical Genetically. Any differences are superficial and meaningless. Children. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You must be the only one in the world who thinks races don't exist

The United States Census Bureau mentions "race" three times in this one paragraph ...

"Though many respondents expect to see a Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish category on the race question, this question is asked separately because people of Hispanic origin may be of any race(s). The Census Bureau collects these data in accordance with the 1997 Office of Management and Budget standards on race and ethnicity."

Where does that leave you? .... up the creek without a paddle

Back to top

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #29 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:38pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 10:15am:

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:58am:

"white skinned" doesnt necessarily imply ancestry

Yes, that's what I said. You're proof that anal sex fiddles with the mind.

'White' in the US is a term that has morphed into a term to indicate socio-economic status, social privilege, political alignment, and/or patriotism.

However, most Americans and those in the Anglosphere still presume it refers to 'race' and in Australia, it is used to refer to nothing but 'race'.

'Hispanic' is a term that means different things to Americans depending on their geolocation.

I don't think 'white' in America - or anywhere else - refers to socio economic status or political alignment or patriotism.
In any case, even if it did, this would make sense ONLY as a distiction from off-white demographics. But to say that whites are richer, more patriotic and of a particular political alignment is preposterous.

A highly educated, affluent, polite and cosmopolitan black man doesn't become 'white' on account of his civilisational acheievements. When he attains that level of civilisation his race as a black man will not disappear but it will hardly matter, scientifically or otherwise.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 8^th, 2024 at 1:03pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #30 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 1:22pm

Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:22pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, boys you seem to be accepting my point and trying to turn it to your own ends. There are no major differences Genetically between the so-called "races". Geneticists would laugh themselves silly reading the bullshit you post, you really are foolish in the extreme. Go home, you're wasting all our time with your outmoded belief in the "races". They do not exist. All the "Races" are identical Genetically. Any differences are superficial and meaningless. Children. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You must be the only one in the world who thinks races don't exist

The United States Census Bureau mentions "race" three times in this one paragraph ...

"Though many respondents expect to see a Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish category on the race question, this question is asked separately because people of Hispanic origin may be of any race(s). The Census Bureau collects these data in accordance with the 1997 Office of Management and Budget standards on race and ethnicity."

Where does that leave you? .... up the creek without a paddle

I am not alone, ask any Geneticist, Bias. You are the one who believes that "Races" are anything other than a social construct. Run along, back to your rock, you really are a fool. You don't understand what is being discussed here. There are no major differences Genetically between the various "races", they can all interbreed. There is only one "race", the human one. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #31 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 1:34pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 1:22pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:22pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, boys you seem to be accepting my point and trying to turn it to your own ends. There are no major differences Genetically between the so-called "races". Geneticists would laugh themselves silly reading the bullshit you post, you really are foolish in the extreme. Go home, you're wasting all our time with your outmoded belief in the "races". They do not exist. All the "Races" are identical Genetically. Any differences are superficial and meaningless. Children. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You must be the only one in the world who thinks races don't exist

The United States Census Bureau mentions "race" three times in this one paragraph ...

"Though many respondents expect to see a Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish category on the race question, this question is asked separately because people of Hispanic origin may be of any race(s). The Census Bureau collects these data in accordance with the 1997 Office of Management and Budget standards on race and ethnicity."

Where does that leave you? .... up the creek without a paddle

I am not alone, ask any Geneticist, Bias. You are the one who believes that "Races" are anything other than a social construct. Run along, back to your rock, you really are a fool. You don't understand what is being discussed here. There are no major differences Genetically between the various "races", they can all interbreed. There is only one "race", the human one. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Totally irrelevant.

Social constructs are more significant than genetics. Interpersonal relationships are not based on DNA matching. Beauty, attractiveness, ugliness, cowardice, laziness, honourableness, dishonesty, etc, etc have zero genetic markers but are very signfificant and the ability to perceive them is in every human being. Similarly, racial or ethnic traits are readily perceived by everyone and rough and ready conscusions are drawn from them, as from the perception of other socially constructed aspects of the human world.

You are banging on about an irrelevancy, cockwomble. Kinda sums you up.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #32 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 1:46pm Is this man 1 Norwegian 2 Korean 3 Saudi 4 Eskimo 5 Thai 6 Algerian 7 Aborigine How can you tell??
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #33 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 2:52pm

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:38pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 10:15am:

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:58am:

"white skinned" doesnt necessarily imply ancestry

Yes, that's what I said. You're proof that anal sex fiddles with the mind.

'White' in the US is a term that has morphed into a term to indicate socio-economic status, social privilege, political alignment, and/or patriotism.

However, most Americans and those in the Anglosphere still presume it refers to 'race' and in Australia, it is used to refer to nothing but 'race'.

'Hispanic' is a term that means different things to Americans depending on their geolocation.

I don't think 'white' in America - or anywhere else - refers to socio economic status or political alignment or patriotism.
In any case, even if it did, this would make sense ONLY as a distiction from off-white demographics. But to say that whites are richer, more patriotic and of a particular political alignment is preposterous.

A highly educated, affluent, polite and cosmopolitan black man doesn't become 'white' on account of his civilisational acheievements. When he attains that level of civilisation his race as a black man will not disappear but it will hardly matter, scientifically or otherwise.

Geez, this is a politics forum and you don't think 'white' refers to affluence, privilege, political alignment or patriotism?

Where does the current disparaging epithet 'some old white guy' come from? What could it mean, you wonder.

In terms of patriotism, in the US the southwestern states were once part of Mexico, so owning your Hispanic roots has connotations of not being patriotic to the US.

'His race as a black man', eh! What a tosser you are.

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #34 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 2:58pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 1:22pm:

Genetically between the various "races", they can all interbreed.

Not only could our ancestors interbreed, but they did and whenever they got the chance - being driven by the instinct towards genetic diversity.

How else can modern European sapiens possibly carry a percentage of Neanderthal DNA?

Back to top

IP Logged

Bias_2012

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10640
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #35 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:11pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 1:22pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:22pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, boys you seem to be accepting my point and trying to turn it to your own ends. There are no major differences Genetically between the so-called "races". Geneticists would laugh themselves silly reading the bullshit you post, you really are foolish in the extreme. Go home, you're wasting all our time with your outmoded belief in the "races". They do not exist. All the "Races" are identical Genetically. Any differences are superficial and meaningless. Children. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You must be the only one in the world who thinks races don't exist

The United States Census Bureau mentions "race" three times in this one paragraph ...

"Though many respondents expect to see a Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish category on the race question, this question is asked separately because people of Hispanic origin may be of any race(s). The Census Bureau collects these data in accordance with the 1997 Office of Management and Budget standards on race and ethnicity."

Where does that leave you? .... up the creek without a paddle

I am not alone, ask any Geneticist, Bias. You are the one who believes that "Races" are anything other than a social construct. Run along, back to your rock, you really are a fool. You don't understand what is being discussed here. There are no major differences Genetically between the various "races", they can all interbreed. There is only one "race", the human one. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You'd better write a letter to the The United States Census Bureau then, and put them right

BTW You are still carrying on with your depravity and insults tsk tsk ... Do you understand now that you don't practice what you preach?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:33pm by Bias_2012 »

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #36 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 2:52pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:38pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 10:15am:

JC Denton wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 9:58am:

"white skinned" doesnt necessarily imply ancestry

Yes, that's what I said. You're proof that anal sex fiddles with the mind.

'White' in the US is a term that has morphed into a term to indicate socio-economic status, social privilege, political alignment, and/or patriotism.

However, most Americans and those in the Anglosphere still presume it refers to 'race' and in Australia, it is used to refer to nothing but 'race'.

'Hispanic' is a term that means different things to Americans depending on their geolocation.

I don't think 'white' in America - or anywhere else - refers to socio economic status or political alignment or patriotism.
In any case, even if it did, this would make sense ONLY as a distiction from off-white demographics. But to say that whites are richer, more patriotic and of a particular political alignment is preposterous.

A highly educated, affluent, polite and cosmopolitan black man doesn't become 'white' on account of his civilisational acheievements. When he attains that level of civilisation his race as a black man will not disappear but it will hardly matter, scientifically or otherwise.

Geez, this is a politics forum and you don't think 'white' refers to affluence, privilege, political alignment or patriotism?

Where does the current disparaging epithet 'some old white guy' come from? What could it mean, you wonder.

In terms of patriotism, in the US the southwestern states were once part of Mexico, so owning your Hispanic roots has connotations of not being patriotic to the US.

'His race as a black man', eh! What a tosser you are.

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #37 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 47226 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #38 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:04pm First 'NATIVE' American actress Lily Gladstone to win Academy Award. https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/lily-gladstone-the-very-first-native-americ... ...because anyone else born in America is not 'Native' born. Racism and Culturalism innit? Such is the Media's corruption of Politics.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #39 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #40 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'?? You live alone.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #41 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:51pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'??

The sane.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #42 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:28pm

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'??

The sane.

Well that certainly excludes you, Soren. You are the most insane person here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #43 - Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:30pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:28pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'??

The sane.

Well that certainly excludes you, Soren. You are the most insane person here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Recognising you as a befuddled cockwomble who yawns and tut tuts is not insane, Bbwian.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 9^th, 2024 at 10:53am by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #44 - Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:07pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 1:22pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 12:22pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 11:08am:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, boys you seem to be accepting my point and trying to turn it to your own ends. There are no major differences Genetically between the so-called "races". Geneticists would laugh themselves silly reading the bullshit you post, you really are foolish in the extreme. Go home, you're wasting all our time with your outmoded belief in the "races". They do not exist. All the "Races" are identical Genetically. Any differences are superficial and meaningless. Children. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You must be the only one in the world who thinks races don't exist

The United States Census Bureau mentions "race" three times in this one paragraph ...

"Though many respondents expect to see a Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish category on the race question, this question is asked separately because people of Hispanic origin may be of any race(s). The Census Bureau collects these data in accordance with the 1997 Office of Management and Budget standards on race and ethnicity."

Where does that leave you? .... up the creek without a paddle

I am not alone, ask any Geneticist, Bias. You are the one who believes that "Races" are anything other than a social construct. Run along, back to your rock, you really are a fool. You don't understand what is being discussed here. There are no major differences Genetically between the various "races", they can all interbreed. There is only one "race", the human one. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

When you applaud Aboriginals, what are you recognising and applauding, cockwomble?

What IS the Aboriginality that you recognise as different to you or me if not ancestry, ie racial identity passed on genetically. If there is no such thing as race, what IS aboriginality, wgphat is Africanness, what is a Jew, an Arab, a Chinese, a Japanese, Maori, Indian, Papuan or Eskimo??

All the same? No diff? Of course there is diff. It is obvious to everyone. Everybody recognises racial differences. They are obvious and evident. Only an idiot like you would pretend not to see them.

The second thing is - if they are different, as evidently they are, what is the rank order, the hierarchy?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #45 - Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:13pm

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:28pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'??

The sane.

Well that certainly excludes you, Soren. You are the most insane person here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Recognising you as a befuddled cockwomble who yawns and tut tuts is not insane, Bbwian.

Did you once have another id here where you pretended to be a woman?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #46 - Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:21pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:13pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:28pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'??

The sane.

Well that certainly excludes you, Soren. You are the most insane person here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Recognising you as a befuddled cockwomble who yawns and tut tuts is not insane, Bbwian.

Did you once have another id here where you pretended to be a woman?

That was my Aunt Agatha, my tough aunt, the one who eats broken bottles and conducts human sacrifices by the light of the full moon.

My Aunt Agatha is tall and thin and looks rather like a vulture in the Gobi desert, while Aunt Dahlia is short and solid, like a scrum half in the game of Rugby football. In disposition, too, they differ widely. Aunt Agatha is cold and haughty, though presumably unbending a bit when conducting human sacrifices at the time of the full moon, as she is widely rumoured to do, and her attitude towards me has always been that of an austere governess, causing me to feel as if I were six years old and she had just caught me stealing jam from the jam cupboard: whereas Aunt Dahlia is as jovial and bonhomous as a dame in a Christmas pantomime.

There's more to it, of course, but that's enough to satisfy your curiosity for now.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #47 - Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:23pm

Frank wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:21pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:13pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:28pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'??

The sane.

Well that certainly excludes you, Soren. You are the most insane person here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Recognising you as a befuddled cockwomble who yawns and tut tuts is not insane, Bbwian.

Did you once have another id here where you pretended to be a woman?

That was my Aunt Agatha, my tough aunt, the one who eats broken bottles and conducts human sacrifices by the light of the full moon.

Norman Bates. Lives in the attic of your head.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #48 - Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:31pm

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:23pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:21pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:13pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:28pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'??

The sane.

Well that certainly excludes you, Soren. You are the most insane person here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Recognising you as a befuddled cockwomble who yawns and tut tuts is not insane, Bbwian.

Did you once have another id here where you pretended to be a woman?

That was my Aunt Agatha, my tough aunt, the one who eats broken bottles and conducts human sacrifices by the light of the full moon.

Norman Bates. Lives in the attic of your head.

Thank you, Attila the Hun. Or shall I just call you Simple Simon?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #49 - Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:34pm

Frank wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:31pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:23pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:21pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 9^th, 2024 at 9:13pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:30pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 8:28pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 7:39pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:54pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 8^th, 2024 at 3:14pm:

The great divide comparison is coming more and more into focus....

How many of the homeless in America, Australia, Britain are "some old white guys"?

I don't think, nor do you, that Kanye West or Kamala Harris are white even though they are far more affluent than me or most white people anywhere. The former supported Trump, the latter Biden.

As for patriotism, you are talking nonsense (again), as if the 19th century was a reliable guide to the 21st. Louisiana was French once, Alaska Russian. Does that mean heir inhabitants today, 200 years on, are tainted with being less patriotic?

You have a little learning but you really don't know what to do with it, other than regurgitate it randomly.

Your inner bitchy fag is at high noon.

Get out of the toilet block and google the issue with identifying as Hispanic in the southwestern states of the US and most parts of the south.

Unbelievable you haven't heard of the 'white guy' negative epithet referring to 'unearned' privilege and affluence and used ad nauseam by 'the woke' and many non-Anglo groups particularly in the US, but also in the UK and Canada.

Thank you, parrot.

As you were. We'll call you.

Who's we'??

The sane.

Well that certainly excludes you, Soren. You are the most insane person here. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Recognising you as a befuddled cockwomble who yawns and tut tuts is not insane, Bbwian.

Did you once have another id here where you pretended to be a woman?

That was my Aunt Agatha, my tough aunt, the one who eats broken bottles and conducts human sacrifices by the light of the full moon.

Norman Bates. Lives in the attic of your head.

Thank you, Attila the Hun. Or shall I just call you Simple Simon?

Are you dressed up as Agatha?

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 47226 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #50 - Mar 10^th, 2024 at 1:52am American Racism. Australian Culturalism. The physical and the mental. Two accusations handed down by the Media people and culture against those who would seek to turn off their TV's like 'heretics' and non-believers.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 47226
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #51 - Mar 20^th, 2024 at 4:21am

The problem with the racist comments is deciding where to draw the line. The way I see it, if people like Pauline Hanson can get elected, then we need to be able to discuss some race issues without censorship, just as politicians can point out the real problems among some ethnic groups. Once you allow that, I can't see any consistent way to distinguish a 'valid' political view from an unacceptable racist attack. If you think you can, please let us all know.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #52 - Mar 20^th, 2024 at 3:51pm

Racism is generally bad. It denigrates people, it discriminates people, all on the socially constructed ideal that White people are best, they are the greatest. The reality is, they aren't. They are just as venal, just as greedy, just as rapacious, just as corrupt, as everybody else. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16234
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #53 - Mar 20^th, 2024 at 6:34pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 3:51pm:

Racism is generally bad. It denigrates people, it discriminates people, all on the socially constructed ideal that White people are best, they are the greatest. The reality is, they aren't. They are just as venal, just as greedy, just as rapacious, just as corrupt, as everybody else. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

But, but, but, you said '"Racism" is a social construct without evidence'. If you have no evidence of racism...

Back to top

IP Logged

MeisterEckhart

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11134
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #54 - Mar 20^th, 2024 at 6:40pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 3:51pm:

Racism is generally bad. It denigrates people, it discriminates people, all on the socially constructed ideal that White people are best, they are the greatest. The reality is, they aren't. They are just as venal, just as greedy, just as rapacious, just as corrupt, as everybody else. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You might be surprised to learn that in Britain. most incidents of ethno-chauvinism ('racism') occur among ethnic minorities - between Pakistanis and Indians, among African nations, and among Caribean nations.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #55 - Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:06pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 3:51pm:

Racism is generally bad. It denigrates people, it discriminates people, all on the socially constructed ideal that White people are best, they are the greatest. The reality is, they aren't. They are just as venal, just as greedy, just as rapacious, just as corrupt, as everybody else. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Social construct this, bbwian.

https://twitter.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1769874404241015061

https://twitter.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1770132912236581339

Marriage promotes white heteropatriarchal supremacy

- this academic has a real doctorate, unlike you. As stupid as you, but.

Or this

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #56 - Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:27pm Social construction, Belgium https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1769760990596387186 Learning the koran https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770328267188293776 https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770156030963433643 Sweden https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770134475864691065
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 40354

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #57 - Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:51pm

Frank wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:27pm:

Social construction, Belgium
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1769760990596387186

Learning the koran
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770328267188293776

https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770156030963433643

Sweden
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770134475864691065

As usual we only see half the story, Soren but hey, what else have we come to expect from Racists and Islamopobes? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #58 - Mar 21^st, 2024 at 9:49am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:27pm:

Social construction, Belgium
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1769760990596387186

Learning the koran
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770328267188293776

https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770156030963433643

Sweden
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770134475864691065

As usual we only see half the story, Soren but hey, what else have we come to expect from Racists and Islamopobes? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Show us the other half of these stories, Bbwian.

Show us white kids beating up a black kid.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

AusGeoff Gold Member Offline Sage of Gippsland Posts: 5999 Victoria Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #59 - Mar 21^st, 2024 at 10:03am The usually pejorative terms "racist" or "racism" each have too many subtle variations of semantics in their usage, making for a difficult, non-emotive debate. As a lifelong atheist, I despise the religion of Islam, and radical Muslims. Does that make me an ethno-religious racist?
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #60 - Mar 21^st, 2024 at 10:14am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence"

It is an idiotic, Bbwianesque notion to say the title, with or "without scientific evidence".
Beauty is a social contruct without scientific evidence. As are most human value judgement. Even science is a social construct. The idea that something is a social construct is itself, of course, a social construct.

There are evident differences between individiual, groups, races, nations etc. That human perception discerns differences is NOT a social construct. What judgement to make of the various inherent differences between things and people is endlessly debatable. Which difference is more important, which difference is irrelevant - none of these are based on scientific evidence because science carries no inherent value in itself. It is a method, nothing else.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #61 - Mar 21^st, 2024 at 10:20am

AusGeoff wrote on Mar 21^st, 2024 at 10:03am:

The usually pejorative terms "racist" or "racism" each have too many
subtle variations of semantics in their usage, making for a difficult,
non-emotive debate.

As a lifelong atheist, I despise the religion of Islam, and radical Muslims.

Does that make me an ethno-religious racist?

Yes and no.

Is this a scientific question? No. It is a moral question.
Is the moral judgement of atheism and antipathy towards Islam a scientifically assessable judgement? No. Is adherence to Islam a scientific act? Not any more than its rejection.

Are you, nevertheless judged to be a ethno-religious racists by the Bbwians of this wrld? Yes. Is Bbwian's a scientific judgement? No.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #62 - Mar 21^st, 2024 at 4:28pm

Frank wrote on Mar 21^st, 2024 at 9:49am:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:27pm:

Social construction, Belgium
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1769760990596387186

Learning the koran
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770328267188293776

https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770156030963433643

Sweden
https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770134475864691065

As usual we only see half the story, Soren but hey, what else have we come to expect from Racists and Islamopobes? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Show us the other half of these stories, Bbwian.

Show us white kids beating up a black kid.

https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1770418920828162547

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40354	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #63 - Mar 21^st, 2024 at 7:52pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #64 - Mar 21^st, 2024 at 8:12pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 21^st, 2024 at 7:52pm:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img641/9394/yawnr.gif

And there's the other half of the story - a big Bbwianesque, mindless, moronic yawn.

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 7:51pm:

As usual we only see half the story, Soren but hey, what else have we come to expect from Racists and Islamopobes? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Yawn is all Bbwian can provide as the other half of the story.

And it is exactly right - gate openers to the barbarians like Bbwian have absolutely no justification for their self-made treachery. Ask them and they yawn.

The enemy within - pudgy, stupid, incoherent yet all- pervasive.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 22^nd, 2024 at 9:14am by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40354	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #65 - Mar 21^st, 2024 at 9:57pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #66 - Mar 22^nd, 2024 at 2:58pm Funny racial and efnik stereotypes: Italians Religions
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #67 - Mar 22^nd, 2024 at 4:18pm Yes, muslims
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #68 - Mar 22^nd, 2024 at 4:19pm
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #69 - Mar 22^nd, 2024 at 7:22pm https://twitter.com/NoContextHumans/status/1769423454254633237
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Bias_2012 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 10640 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #70 - Mar 22^nd, 2024 at 11:36pm Brian Ross wrote on Mar 21^st, 2024 at 9:57pm: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img641/9394/yawnr.gif
Back to top	Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable IP Logged

Bias_2012

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10640
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #71 - Mar 22^nd, 2024 at 11:51pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 20^th, 2024 at 3:51pm:

Racism is generally bad. It denigrates people, it discriminates people, all on the socially constructed ideal that White people are best, they are the greatest. The reality is, they aren't. They are just as venal, just as greedy, just as rapacious, just as corrupt, as everybody else. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

That's a pretty negative way to talk about yourself. You're white aren't you?

Back to top

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable

IP Logged

Bias_2012

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10640
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #72 - Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 12:11am

There's some evidence here ....

Cultural diversity
Ancestry, top responses
All people Greater Sydney % Greater Sydney New South Wales % New South Wales Australia % Australia

English 1,244,708 23.8 2,404,990 29.8 8,385,928 33.0
Australian 1,167,625 22.3 2,307,549 28.6 7,596,753 29.9
Chinese 552,680 10.6 581,641 7.2 1,390,639 5.5
Irish 401,092 7.7 735,340 9.1 2,410,833 9.5
Scottish 315,681 6.0 620,363 7.7 2,176,777 8.6

Language used at home, top responses (other than English)
All people Greater Sydney % Greater Sydney New South Wales % New South Wales Australia % Australia

Mandarin 259,429 5.0 270,685 3.4 685,274 2.7
Arabic 219,483 4.2 227,243 2.8 367,159 1.4
Cantonese 144,538 2.8 148,943 1.8 295,281 1.2
Vietnamese 113,154 2.2 117,907 1.5 320,758 1.3
Hindi 76,308 1.5 80,051 1.0 197,132 0.8

English only used at home 2,995,240 57.3 5,457,982 67.6 18,303,662 72.0

Households where a non-English language is used 767,275 42.0 856,911 29.5 2,295,688 24.8

https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/1GSYD

Back to top

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #73 - Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 7:46am How are the Hindus and Muslims getting on with each other? The Chinese and the Indians? Muslims and the Chinese? I don't see a great mixing and accepting. Whitey must accommodate all but the efniks are not playing with each other. Shurely shome mishtake.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Bias_2012

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10640
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #74 - Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 10:58am

Frank wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 7:46am:

How are the Hindus and Muslims getting on with each other? The Chinese and the Indians? Muslims and the Chinese?

Just lately it's been the Palestinians and the Jews over Gaza. Brian backed away from that issue, "I've got nothing more to discuss with you", he said

It was the Muslims and Hindus last year, re: Blacktown Local Council getting something wrong that caused the two to nearly come to blows

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 6:37pm by Bias_2012 »

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #75 - Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 11:24am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 7^th, 2024 at 3:02pm:

The title should actually be, "without scientific evidence" but forum limitations prevented me from being accurate. Genetically there is more differences between individuals than between various "racial" groups, "Racism" is a social construct, something dreamed up by anthropologists to justify their classification of the various "racial" groups based on superficial differences in skin colour/eye shape/hair frizziness/nose shape/lip thickness/etc. There are no major genetic differences between the various "races". Humans can all interbreed. The visible differences are because of environmental adaptation to conditions, nothing more. It does not denote anything major Genetically.

Genetics is the key, it is how we identify differences between groups of creatures, it is how we know a species is a species. There is only one human species, the homo homo sapiens and we are all members. Anything else is a social construct created by Racists. Eugenics is dead and buried. It was overturned by WWII and the destruction of the Nazi regime. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

American Airlines passenger yelled about ‘blue-eyed white devils’ and threatened to ‘take this plane down’: affidavit

Shail Patel had bloodshot eyes and reeked of alcohol — and yelled at other passengers, “F–k you blue-eyed white devils I’m gonna take this plane down with all you motherf–kers on it,” according to a criminal affidavit obtained by The Post Friday.
https://nypost.com/2024/03/22/us-news/american-airlines-passenger-in-viral-video...

There is no DNA evidence for this news item.... on lythe video and the report.... tsk, tsk Roll Eyes

Another 'no DNA evidence' social construct event.
North African immigrants throw a French boy into the sewer and spit on him. Then they post videos to humiliate him further. They hate us. But luckily, there is no DNA evidence, only your lying eyes. Phew!

https://twitter.com/RadioGenoa/status/1771253092652118345

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 11:58am by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40354	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #76 - Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 4:53pm None so blind as those who refuse to see, Soren. You can continue to live under your rock because to admit that you are wrong is impossible for you. You suffer from a cancer called, "Racism" and you hate the light. Tsk, tsk, tsk...
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #77 - Mar 24^th, 2024 at 8:40pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 4:53pm:

None so blind as those who refuse to see, Soren. You can continue to live under your rock because to admit that you are wrong is impossible for you. You suffer from a cancer called, "Racism" and you hate the light. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

What does an brown Indian shouting 'blue-eyed white devils' suffer from, Bbwian?

Please tell us. This is your special subject.

You can also contemplate this graph

https://twitter.com/fentasyl/status/1771575235424203209

Back to top

« Last Edit: Mar 24^th, 2024 at 8:51pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #78 - Mar 25^th, 2024 at 10:59am

Leaked police report shows 95% of 79 arrested for violent robbery at Spanish festival were Arabs

Of the 79 individuals arrested for aggravated robbery and intimidation at this year’s summer festival in the Spanish city of Bilbao, 75 were of Arab origin, a leaked police detainee list revealed.

The demography of those arrested at the annual nine-day Aste Nagusia celebration was reported by ESdiario, a Spanish digital newspaper, citing an individual named Alvise Pérez, who describes himself as an independent analyst and who published the confidential police detainee list on social media claiming it to be in the national public interest.

The list, which reveals the name and the mugshot of each suspect, reveals what appears to be a high number of males primarily of Maghreb origin, a region that prioritizes Spain as a gateway to Europe due to its proximity to the African continent and the land borders shared at the Spanish African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla.
https://www.rmx.news/crime/leaked-police-report-shows-95-of-the-79-arrests-for-v...

Shurely shome mishtake - Being Arab is not in the DNA (it's in the blood... ed.) Arabs are about 3% of the population in Spain. What a huge difference a little extra Islam+tint makes, eh? Or might there be some other explanation?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40354	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #79 - Mar 25^th, 2024 at 3:32pm None so blind as those who refuse to see, Soren. You can continue to live under your rock because to admit that you are wrong is impossible for you. You suffer from a cancer called, "Racism" and you hate the light. Tsk, tsk, tsk...
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #80 - Mar 25^th, 2024 at 3:34pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 25^th, 2024 at 3:32pm:

None so blind as those who refuse to see, Soren. You can continue to live under your rock because to admit that you are wrong is impossible for you. You suffer from a cancer called, "Racism" and you hate the light. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2024 at 4:53pm:

None so blind as those who refuse to see, Soren. You can continue to live under your rock because to admit that you are wrong is impossible for you. You suffer from a cancer called, "Racism" and you hate the light. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 134950
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #81 - Mar 25^th, 2024 at 5:37pm

Frank wrote on Mar 25^th, 2024 at 10:59am:

Leaked police report shows 95% of 79 arrested for violent robbery at Spanish festival were Arabs

Of the 79 individuals arrested for aggravated robbery and intimidation at this year’s summer festival in the Spanish city of Bilbao, 75 were of Arab origin, a leaked police detainee list revealed.

...

The police were targeting Arabs?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #82 - Mar 25^th, 2024 at 7:47pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2024 at 5:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 25^th, 2024 at 10:59am:

Leaked police report shows 95% of 79 arrested for violent robbery at Spanish festival were Arabs

Of the 79 individuals arrested for aggravated robbery and intimidation at this year’s summer festival in the Spanish city of Bilbao, 75 were of Arab origin, a leaked police detainee list revealed.

...

The police were targeting Arabs?

Oh... here's turdy to rescue Daddy Bbwian! Mhmmhhh.... touching.

No. Arabs - Muslims- are a toxic addition to Europe. A toxic addition to all and every country.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40354	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #83 - Mar 25^th, 2024 at 10:28pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #84 - Mar 26^th, 2024 at 10:14am Brian Ross wrote on Mar 25^th, 2024 at 10:28pm: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img641/9394/yawnr.gif Oh, look! Bbwian explains himself!
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

JC Denton Gold Member Offline Posts: 5459 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #85 - Mar 26^th, 2024 at 3:43pm
Back to top	IP Logged

Setanta Gold Member Offline \/ Peace man! Posts: 16234 Northern NSW Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #86 - Mar 26^th, 2024 at 4:05pm JC Denton wrote on Mar 26^th, 2024 at 3:43pm: So Mimo is not a whitey?
Back to top	IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 47226
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #87 - Mar 26^th, 2024 at 6:01pm

Arabs are 'caucasoid' (as are Indians and some black north-east Africans).
No wonder the 'Negroids' put them up against the wall.

It's a Race War. Negroids and Mongoloids didn't want the Caucasoids invading their Africa & Asia.
Europe was the backyard to the Middle-East front yard. One 'white', the other 'brown' - but both 'caucasoid'.

Now the White Caucasoids have taken the lands of North America & Sahul and the Mongoloids have seen the threat come from behind and the Negroids are now seeing the threat come from the South.

There is a positive and negative to all things - even 'Racism'.
The positive is - sticking up for your Race and surviving against the negative attacking 'racists'. The ultimate 'positive' is doing this by 'out-breeding' the other race.
When it comes to 'power', well that's 'Culturalism', not Racism.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #88 - Mar 26^th, 2024 at 6:19pm

Jasin wrote on Mar 26^th, 2024 at 6:01pm:

Arabs are 'caucasoid' (as are Indians and some black north-east Africans).
No wonder the 'Negroids' put them up against the wall.

It's a Race War. Negroids and Mongoloids didn't want the Caucasoids invading their Africa & Asia.
Europe was the backyard to the Middle-East front yard. One 'white', the other 'brown' - but both 'caucasoid'.

Now the White Caucasoids have taken the lands of North America & Sahul and the Mongoloids have seen the threat come from behind and the Negroids are now seeing the threat come from the South.

There is a positive and negative to all things - even 'Racism'.
The positive is - sticking up for your Race and surviving against the negative attacking 'racists'. The ultimate 'positive' is doing this by 'out-breeding' the other race.
When it comes to 'power', well that's 'Culturalism', not Racism.

Too many 'young adult' fantasy novels, pal.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

JC Denton Gold Member Offline Posts: 5459 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #89 - Mar 26^th, 2024 at 9:45pm and not enough anti-psychotic meds
Back to top	IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 47226
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #90 - Mar 27^th, 2024 at 7:46am

Frank wrote on Mar 26^th, 2024 at 6:19pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 26^th, 2024 at 6:01pm:

Arabs are 'caucasoid' (as are Indians and some black north-east Africans).
No wonder the 'Negroids' put them up against the wall.

It's a Race War. Negroids and Mongoloids didn't want the Caucasoids invading their Africa & Asia.
Europe was the backyard to the Middle-East front yard. One 'white', the other 'brown' - but both 'caucasoid'.

Now the White Caucasoids have taken the lands of North America & Sahul and the Mongoloids have seen the threat come from behind and the Negroids are now seeing the threat come from the South.

There is a positive and negative to all things - even 'Racism'.
The positive is - sticking up for your Race and surviving against the negative attacking 'racists'. The ultimate 'positive' is doing this by 'out-breeding' the other race.
When it comes to 'power', well that's 'Culturalism', not Racism.

Too many 'young adult' fantasy novels, pal.

You read what is 'known'.
I write what is 'to know'.
Sorry Frank - but you're a Beta. Grin

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #91 - Apr 12^th, 2024 at 8:04pm In New York City, a White man stops to give his coat to a homeless Black man, who then proceeds to repeatedly beat, & then rob, the White man. https://twitter.com/AmericazOutlaw/status/1776339874343276578
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #92 - Apr 24^th, 2024 at 7:28pm This graph illustrates the woke mind virus taking over legacy media. Same happened with online media and the education system. Then it spread to other countries. Infection rate almost 100%. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1783053802033332486
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 47226
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #93 - Apr 24^th, 2024 at 9:12pm

Ancient Melbournian saying "We love Black, White, Blue, Yellow, Green, Grey, Brown and Red people."
"...we just hate all the 'foreign' ones"

Ancient Sydnean saying "We love Black, White, Blue, Yellow, Green, Grey, Brown and Red people."
"...we just hate all the 'local' ones."

So which one is the 'Racist'?

Yes, this is a 'trick' question. So be careful. Wink

(Challenge to Frank, Mr Eccy, GreatDivide and even FD) Cheesy

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #94 - Apr 27^th, 2024 at 9:09pm

Jasin wrote on Apr 24^th, 2024 at 9:12pm:

Ancient Melbournian saying "We love Black, White, Blue, Yellow, Green, Grey, Brown and Red people."
"...we just hate all the 'foreign' ones"

Ancient Sydnean saying "We love Black, White, Blue, Yellow, Green, Grey, Brown and Red people."
"...we just hate all the 'local' ones."

So which one is the 'Racist'?

Yes, this is a 'trick' question. So be careful. Wink

(Challenge to Frank, Mr Eccy, GreatDivide and even FD) Cheesy

Whoever said, all those decades ago, that you make sense and should press on was lying to you.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #95 - May 5^th, 2024 at 2:00pm
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #96 - May 6^th, 2024 at 5:24pm Woman brags about shoplifting from Target and suggests that store price tags aren't mandatory. https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1785704448200749366
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #97 - Jun 29^th, 2024 at 7:20pm

GERMANY: Woman Convicted Of “Offending” Migrant Gang Rapists Receives Longer Prison Sentence Than The Rapists

https://www.thepublica.com/germany-woman-convicted-of-offending-migrant-gang-rap...-rapists/

The rapists were identified as a Pole, an Egyptian, a Libyan, a Kuwaiti, an Iranian, an Armenian, an Afghan, a Syrian, and a Montenegrin. The men had a team of 20 defense attorneys arguing their innocence.

https://www.thepublica.com/germany-woman-convicted-of-offending-migrant-gang-rap...

Allahu Akhbar, insh'allah, innit.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #98 - Jul 2^nd, 2024 at 5:27pm Skilled migration and vibrant diversity is our strength Shameless Sikh insurance scammers caught in the act in Sydney: ‘This is why your insurance is going up’ https://www.noticer.news/sikh-insurance-scam-sydney-dashcam/ Because who would cook your goat vindaloo without them? Tsk, tsl
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 40354	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #99 - Jul 2^nd, 2024 at 8:52pm
Back to top	Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #100 - Jul 2^nd, 2024 at 9:22pm Brian Ross wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2024 at 8:52pm: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img641/9394/yawnr.gif Big vagina, Bbwiyawn.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

UnSubRocky Gold Member Offline Australian Legend Posts: 23780 Hidden Location (Yaamba) Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #101 - Jul 2^nd, 2024 at 9:38pm Brian Ross wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2024 at 8:52pm: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img641/9394/yawnr.gif Brian: This is my impression of a whale shark feeding.
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 43227 Gender:	Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence Reply #102 - Jul 26^th, 2024 at 10:31am Another day, another brawl between doctors & engineers at a grocery store. Why does this keep happening? https://x.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1816507671790645308
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 43227
Gender: male

Re: "Racism" is a social construct without evidence
Reply #103 - Jul 26^th, 2024 at 3:19pm

Do not ask a black man not to smoke on the train.

https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/1816460113105834294

Or to have a ticket
https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/1816686932132319479

But as every schoolboy knows, "we Africans are most intelligent race on planet! We invented everything: traffic lights, cars, computers, toilets etc."
https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/1815800768085053734

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged