Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 26
Send Topic Print
Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream (Read 10237 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17692
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #210 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:31pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:28pm:
So why don't we just throw it in with domestic garbage? That also ends up underground.



What didn't you understand about "safety"? You really are getting silly.

freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:26pm:
Why did you suggest 3 or 4? Do you think that would be enough?


That depends on the radioactive material. You do understand question  marks? Roll Eyes

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49081
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #211 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:34pm
 
lee wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:31pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:28pm:
So why don't we just throw it in with domestic garbage? That also ends up underground.



What didn't you understand about "safety"? You really are getting silly.

freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:26pm:
Why did you suggest 3 or 4? Do you think that would be enough?


That depends on the radioactive material. You do understand question  marks? Roll Eyes



I don't understand why you suggested 3 or 4 half lifes. I suspect you are copying and pasting the definition but still not understanding it.

I also don't understand why you suggest it costs nothing to store radioactive waste forever.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17692
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #212 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:43pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:34pm:
I don't understand why you suggested 3 or 4 half lifes.


It depends on the level of radioactivity. A low level say one with a life in milliseconds would have very little residual after 2 milliseconds. But I can see why you don't understand. Roll Eyes

freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:34pm:
I also don't understand why you suggest it costs nothing to store radioactive waste forever.


Why what do you think it would cost? Roll Eyes

I guess I shouldn't have confused you with the concept of time constants.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41942
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #213 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:05pm
 
lee wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:25pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:00pm:
Why use "stimulated" weather when real weather data is available, Lee.  Just head over to the Bureau of Meteorology.



And how many days per month do they say?


Why the continued emphasis on wind and sun "droughts". Lee? As already indicated the various elements complement each other.  When the wind does not blow, the sun shines, when the sun does not shine, the wind blows, when there is no sun and no wind, there is pumped hydro or hydrogen.  All complement each other very well.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5471
Gender: female
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #214 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:33pm
 
they are going to take so long to get these things built assuming this project even begins i dare say most of the people in this thread complaining about it for or against obsessively may never even see these reactors operational in their lifetimes

if there is a way this will be bungled or sabotaged by petty partisan politics / inter-organisational project sabotage it will happen

even if there is some inherent cost saving to these reactors their operators will find some way to gouge consumers to the max (duh it's australia) so the hopes and dreams of so many people here to see their quarterly power bill slashed by one fifth or whatever will likely never come to fruition anyway
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49081
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #215 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:37pm
 
lee wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 2:43pm:
It depends on the level of radioactivity. A low level say one with a life in milliseconds would have very little residual after 2 milliseconds. But I can see why you don't understand. Roll Eyes


What does the half life tell you about the level of radioactivity?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17692
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #216 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:41pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:37pm:
What does the half life tell you about the level of radioactivity?


Nothing without the specific material. But surely you know that. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20401
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #217 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:43pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Mar 16th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Mar 16th, 2024 at 5:17pm:
Australia cannot deal with the radioactive waste it already has???

Quote:
Australia’s nuclear waste is growing as battle over dump site heats up

Government says nuclear waste cannot continue to build up and it will work with traditional custodians of proposed Kimba site

Australia is accumulating more intermediate-level nuclear waste than previously thought, a new inventory has found, as the battle over a nuclear waste dump heats up.

After 40 years of different governments talking about a national nuclear waste facility, the Morrison government chose a site near the town of Kimba in South Australia. But the local Barngarla people are united against the plan, and have vowed to keep fighting to stop it happening.


Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/oct/14/australias-nuclear-waste-...


Simple. No one in Australia ever has an x ray again.  Roll Eyes


The New Nuclear Reactors being proposed will produce High Grade Nuclear Waste....We cannot even deal with the Nuclear Waste we already have....You solution appears to be we ignore it and it will go away!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17692
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #218 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:45pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:05pm:
Why the continued emphasis on wind and sun "droughts". Lee? As already indicated the various elements complement each other. 

The hydrogen is said to be specifically driven by solar. Roll Eyes

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:05pm:
when there is no sun and no wind, there is pumped hydro or hydrogen.  All complement each other very well. 


Pumped hydro is not large enough for more than a few minutes. The hydrogen will not be large enough driven by solar only. Roll Eyes

Edit: "The Photovoltaic Heat Island Effect: Larger solar power plants
increase local temperatures"

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep35070
Back to top
« Last Edit: Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:55pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5428
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #219 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:53pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:43pm:
Belgarion wrote on Mar 16th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Mar 16th, 2024 at 5:17pm:
Australia cannot deal with the radioactive waste it already has???

Quote:
Australia’s nuclear waste is growing as battle over dump site heats up

Government says nuclear waste cannot continue to build up and it will work with traditional custodians of proposed Kimba site

Australia is accumulating more intermediate-level nuclear waste than previously thought, a new inventory has found, as the battle over a nuclear waste dump heats up.

After 40 years of different governments talking about a national nuclear waste facility, the Morrison government chose a site near the town of Kimba in South Australia. But the local Barngarla people are united against the plan, and have vowed to keep fighting to stop it happening.


Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/oct/14/australias-nuclear-waste-...


Simple. No one in Australia ever has an x ray again.  Roll Eyes


The New Nuclear Reactors being proposed will produce High Grade Nuclear Waste....We cannot even deal with the Nuclear Waste we already have....You solution appears to be we ignore it and it will go away!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


There is very little 'waste' produced by nuclear power generation. A piece of uranium the size of a beer can will provide all the energy a person would use throughout their life.  Even then, 96% of spent nuclear fuel can be recycled. The remaining 4% can be safely stored, with a good chance that improvements in technology may see even more recycling efficiency. 

https://www.tiktok.com/@theradguyglows/video/7093460017868770606

https://www.anl.gov/article/nuclear-fuel-recycling-could-offer-plentiful-energy

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/fuel-recycling/...


Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41942
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #220 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 4:23pm
 
lee wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:45pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:05pm:
Why the continued emphasis on wind and sun "droughts". Lee? As already indicated the various elements complement each other. 

The hydrogen is said to be specifically driven by solar. Roll Eyes


Still missing the point, deliberately, aren't you, Lee.  The sun shines on photo-voltaic cells which produce electricity.  When there is no sun, there is wind, when there no wind, there is pumped hydro and there is stored hydrogen.  All your protests are a waste of time.  They will be taken care of by a complementary method of power generation.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 46530
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #221 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 4:24pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:53pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:43pm:
Belgarion wrote on Mar 16th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Mar 16th, 2024 at 5:17pm:
Australia cannot deal with the radioactive waste it already has???

Quote:
Australia’s nuclear waste is growing as battle over dump site heats up

Government says nuclear waste cannot continue to build up and it will work with traditional custodians of proposed Kimba site

Australia is accumulating more intermediate-level nuclear waste than previously thought, a new inventory has found, as the battle over a nuclear waste dump heats up.

After 40 years of different governments talking about a national nuclear waste facility, the Morrison government chose a site near the town of Kimba in South Australia. But the local Barngarla people are united against the plan, and have vowed to keep fighting to stop it happening.


Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/oct/14/australias-nuclear-waste-...


Simple. No one in Australia ever has an x ray again.  Roll Eyes


The New Nuclear Reactors being proposed will produce High Grade Nuclear Waste....We cannot even deal with the Nuclear Waste we already have....You solution appears to be we ignore it and it will go away!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


There is very little 'waste' produced by nuclear power generation. A piece of uranium the size of a beer can will provide all the energy a person would use throughout their life.  Even then, 96% of spent nuclear fuel can be recycled. The remaining 4% can be safely stored, with a good chance that improvements in technology may see even more recycling efficiency. 

https://www.tiktok.com/@theradguyglows/video/7093460017868770606

https://www.anl.gov/article/nuclear-fuel-recycling-could-offer-plentiful-energy

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/fuel-recycling/...





Not only but also:

How will all those aging wind turbines, batteries and solar panels be recycled?  They are very energy-intensive to produce as well as to disassemble and recycle.


Pumped hydro strikes me as the stupidest idea. A fantasy perpetuum mobile with surplus energy created in every cycle.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41942
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #222 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 4:25pm
 
Belgarion wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:53pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 3:43pm:
Belgarion wrote on Mar 16th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Mar 16th, 2024 at 5:17pm:
Australia cannot deal with the radioactive waste it already has???

Quote:
Australia’s nuclear waste is growing as battle over dump site heats up

Government says nuclear waste cannot continue to build up and it will work with traditional custodians of proposed Kimba site

Australia is accumulating more intermediate-level nuclear waste than previously thought, a new inventory has found, as the battle over a nuclear waste dump heats up.

After 40 years of different governments talking about a national nuclear waste facility, the Morrison government chose a site near the town of Kimba in South Australia. But the local Barngarla people are united against the plan, and have vowed to keep fighting to stop it happening.


Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/oct/14/australias-nuclear-waste-...


Simple. No one in Australia ever has an x ray again.  Roll Eyes


The New Nuclear Reactors being proposed will produce High Grade Nuclear Waste....We cannot even deal with the Nuclear Waste we already have....You solution appears to be we ignore it and it will go away!!!

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


There is very little 'waste' produced by nuclear power generation. A piece of uranium the size of a beer can will provide all the energy a person would use throughout their life.  Even then, 96% of spent nuclear fuel can be recycled. The remaining 4% can be safely stored, with a good chance that improvements in technology may see even more recycling efficiency. 

https://www.tiktok.com/@theradguyglows/video/7093460017868770606

https://www.anl.gov/article/nuclear-fuel-recycling-could-offer-plentiful-energy

https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/fuel-recycling/...


"Vey little waste" does not mean no waste is produced.  The more fuel used, the more waste is produced.  Nuclear waste is difficult to store for hundreds of thousands of years.  All your protests do not make the waste disappear, they do not render the waste safe.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5428
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #223 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 4:38pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 4:25pm:
"Vey little waste" does not mean no waste is produced.  The more fuel used, the more waste is produced.  Nuclear waste is difficult to store for hundreds of thousands of years.  All your protests do not make the waste disappear, they do not render the waste safe.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


A picture paints a thousand words. This is Maddie Hilly. An American environmentalist:

https://www.americanexperiment.org/pregnant-woman-poses-with-nuclear-waste-to-pr...

Fear and ignorance are the dangers here, not spent nuclear fuel.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17692
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #224 - Mar 17th, 2024 at 4:44pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 4:23pm:
The sun shines on photo-voltaic cells which produce electricity.  When there is no sun, there is wind, when there no wind, there is pumped hydro and there is stored hydrogen. 


So there is no such thing as prolonged wind and  solar drought, over days. Got it. And you were busy telling us how we have no SMR's currently. But we also have no renewable hydrogen currently. Roll Eyes

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 17th, 2024 at 4:23pm:
They will be taken care of by a complementary method of power generation.


Oh will be. Again that's not current. Tell us when we get to 100% renewables. I will keep my 4WD diesel ute though. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 26
Send Topic Print