Australian Politics Forum - Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49062 At my desk.	Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream Reply #30 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 5:55pm lee wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 5:53pm: freediver wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 5:51pm: What about time? Would they also need time? Only you would think it could be done ex officio. I think you missed the point Lee. Which bill were you referring to?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17662 Gender:	Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream Reply #31 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:00pm A Bill to rescind the ban on nuclear power. Can be simple.
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49062 At my desk.	Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream Reply #32 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:04pm lee wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:00pm: A Bill to rescind the ban on nuclear power. Can be simple. And that's all they need to do in order to get a nuclear power plant built in 5 years?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20396
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #33 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:17pm

Rooftop solar is already connected to the grid....Nuclear power is too expensive and would take too long to build....Dutton showed it was a thought bubble with no substance when he proposed Small Modular Nuclear Reactors but when he was told they are not currently available within a few days he had switched from his non existent thought bubble to Full Scale Nuclear Reactors....Australia does not need Nuclear Power Plants or the Nuclear Waste and it will not happen without bi-partisan support....Dutton will propose anything to avoid supporting renewable energy!!!

Roll Eyes

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17662
Gender: male

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #34 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:39pm

philperth2010 wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:17pm:

Rooftop solar is already connected to the grid.

And suffers from the same problems wherever it is located. Doesn't work well before 9am or after 3pm. Roll Eyes

philperth2010 wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:17pm:

Dutton will propose anything to avoid supporting renewable energy!!!

Yeah. With good reason. It doesn't work well enough. If it did, it wouldn't need expensive batteries or hydro as backup. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17662 Gender:	Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream Reply #35 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:40pm freediver wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:04pm: And that's all they need to do in order to get a nuclear power plant built in 5 years? They don't need to reinvent the wheel. There are plans out there.
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49062
At my desk.

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #36 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:01pm

lee wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:40pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 6:04pm:

And that's all they need to do in order to get a nuclear power plant built in 5 years?

They don't need to reinvent the wheel. There are plans out there. Roll Eyes

I mean, do you think they would only have to repeal the law banning nuclear power? No other legislative changes?

How long do you think it would take them to choose a location for our first nuclear power plant?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Online Posts: 48607 Gender:	Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream Reply #37 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:38pm Mt Warning would be a good place for a Nuclear Power Plant. They can even re-name it Mt Doom. Progress!
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41879

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #38 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:39pm

Belgarion wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 5:16pm:

The average construction time for a nuclear power plant is 7.5 years. This can be increased by the amount of green tape that is put in the way by anti-nuclear politicians, activists and bureaucrats. it should be noted that this green tape is in no way related to safety and environmental issues but is a deliberate stumbling block designed to make progress as difficult as possible for ideological reasons.

As already mentioned, "greentape" exists to protect people and the environment. It has been created because of environmental disasters in the past because there was no. "tape" designed to protect people and the environment. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 41879

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #39 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:43pm

Belgarion wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 5:21pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 10^th, 2024 at 5:53pm:

lee wrote on Mar 10^th, 2024 at 5:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 10^th, 2024 at 4:56pm:

So-called, "greentape" exist to protect the people and the environment from idiots like you, Lee and the failed Queensland ex-Copper.

Oh you mean like environmental idiots who want to destroy the environment by putting up Solar arrays and wind turbines. Weather dependant renewables will not power Australia. Therefore something else has to happen.

"Green" Germany is cutting down 120,000 trees to put in more wind turbines. And Germany is suffering from the cuts to reliable, dispatchable electricity.

Australia want to put in wind turbines off Portland, don't worry about the whales. Roll Eyes

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, Lee your concern is commendable even if fake. You just want belching Chimney stacks spewing smoke and pollution and it seems radiation across the land. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Utter rubbish. Nuclear is clean, safe and reliable, the only issue is the ill informed fear mongering by those with an agenda. Roll Eyes

Tell that the residents of Sellafield, 3 mile Island, Chernabyl and Fukashima, Belgarion. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Back to top

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour. Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17662
Gender: male

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #40 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:54pm

freediver wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:01pm:

I mean, do you think they would only have to repeal the law banning nuclear power? No other legislative changes?

Now you start asking questions. That's good. Of course there will be legislation. To enable nuclear generation, the safeguards are generally in place vis a vis Lucas Heights.

freediver wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:01pm:

How long do you think it would take them to choose a location for our first nuclear power plant?

I am sure there are many that have been earmarked from earlier years, before the nuclear power ban.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17662
Gender: male

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #41 - Mar 11^th, 2024 at 10:04pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:43pm:

Tell that the residents of Sellafield, 3 mile Island, Chernabyl and Fukashima

Sellafield? 1957? Wow. Nuclear has not advanced since? Roll Eyes

3 Mile Island? "Local activism in the 1980s, based on anecdotal reports of negative health effects, led to scientific studies being commissioned. A variety of epidemiology studies have concluded that the accident had no observable long-term health effects."...wiki

Fukushima? An earthquake and tsunami with the pumps below the reactor. And no adverse health effects.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49062
At my desk.

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #42 - Mar 12^th, 2024 at 7:15am

lee wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:54pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:01pm:

I mean, do you think they would only have to repeal the law banning nuclear power? No other legislative changes?

Now you start asking questions. That's good. Of course there will be legislation. To enable nuclear generation, the safeguards are generally in place vis a vis Lucas Heights.

freediver wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:01pm:

How long do you think it would take them to choose a location for our first nuclear power plant?

I am sure there are many that have been earmarked from earlier years, before the nuclear power ban.

So how long do you think it would take to make all the necessary legislative changes? Or are you suggesting that our country is so lacking in "green tape" that we could start building nuclear power plants after repealing a single law?

You cannot build a power plant in many earmarked locations. You have to choose one. How long do you think that would take?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74619
Gender: male

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #43 - Mar 12^th, 2024 at 8:18am

lee wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:54pm:

I am sure there are many that have been earmarked from earlier years, before the nuclear power ban.

Like the one at Hyams Beach, in the middle of Jervis Bay national Park and Marine Park? That won't take long at all . They've even got the foundations already poured Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Belgarion

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5426
Gender: male

Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #44 - Mar 12^th, 2024 at 8:18am

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 9:43pm:

Belgarion wrote on Mar 11^th, 2024 at 5:21pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 10^th, 2024 at 5:53pm:

lee wrote on Mar 10^th, 2024 at 5:12pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 10^th, 2024 at 4:56pm:

So-called, "greentape" exist to protect the people and the environment from idiots like you, Lee and the failed Queensland ex-Copper.

Oh you mean like environmental idiots who want to destroy the environment by putting up Solar arrays and wind turbines. Weather dependant renewables will not power Australia. Therefore something else has to happen.

"Green" Germany is cutting down 120,000 trees to put in more wind turbines. And Germany is suffering from the cuts to reliable, dispatchable electricity.

Australia want to put in wind turbines off Portland, don't worry about the whales. Roll Eyes

Oh, dearie, dearie, me, Lee your concern is commendable even if fake. You just want belching Chimney stacks spewing smoke and pollution and it seems radiation across the land. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Utter rubbish. Nuclear is clean, safe and reliable, the only issue is the ill informed fear mongering by those with an agenda. Roll Eyes

Tell that the residents of Sellafield, 3 mile Island, Chernabyl and Fukashima, Belgarion. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

Tell us how many people were harmed by radiation in each of these incidents. Roll Eyes

Back to top

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)

IP Logged