Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26
Send Topic Print
Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream (Read 10089 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49069
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #330 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:22pm
 
Quote:
So no such thing as baseload power, like that needed to keep hospitals etc running?


If that's what you think baseload power is, you have proved my point.

Do you hospitals just let their patients die in a blackout?

If you cannot tell me what the countries "needs" are, why do you ask me how we will meet them?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17673
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #331 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:39pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:22pm:
If that's what you think baseload power is, you have proved my point.



Baseload power is merely the ability to provide power as and when needed. With renewables that can't be guaranteed.

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:22pm:
Do you hospitals just let their patients die in a blackout?


No they rely on fossil fuel generators. With no fossil fuel there will be no generators. Roll Eyes

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:22pm:
If you cannot tell me what the countries "needs" are, why do you ask me how we will meet them?


The country needs to be able to power all the manufacturing and service industries.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49069
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #332 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:55pm
 
Quote:
With renewables that can't be guaranteed.


No technology comes with a guarantee. Despite what the coalition's propaganda department tells you.

Quote:
No they rely on fossil fuel generators. With no fossil fuel there will be no generators.


Their first response is most likely a battery.

Quote:
The country needs to be able to power all the manufacturing and service industries.


You really don't know what you are talking about. None of those "needs" are fixed.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17673
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #333 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 6:10pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:55pm:
No technology comes with a guarantee.


But with 3 technologies there is no guarantee. Roll Eyes

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:55pm:
Their first response is most likely a battery.


Probably not apart from whilst waiting for the genies to kick in. They have batteries for the electric start. Roll Eyes

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 5:55pm:
You really don't know what you are talking about. None of those "needs" are fixed.


No but they have a certain expectation. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49069
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #334 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 6:20pm
 
Quote:
No but they have a certain expectation.


What do they expect? Whatever the coalition propaganda tells them to expect?

There will be plenty of industries eager to take advantage of the regular dirt cheap electricity prices we will get with renewables. Once money is involved, people's expectations tent to rapidly adjust to reality.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17673
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #335 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 6:41pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 6:20pm:
What do they expect?


To have power when they need it.

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 6:20pm:
There will be plenty of industries eager to take advantage of the regular dirt cheap electricity prices we will get with renewables.


And yet anywhere there is renewables power prices have risen. Germany is a case in point. Enough renewables, on paper, to drive their economy. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49069
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #336 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 8:43pm
 
Quote:
And yet anywhere there is renewables power prices have risen.


They have risen and fallen. You know we haven't had a single price for electricity for a very long time, right? The prices given for wind power on that wikipedia page - the ones you tricked yourself into thinking are not real and therefor you should not include them in your comparison - they are the real prices, and even at the high end are cheaper than nuclear.

Are you still insisting I explain how we will meet demand while refusing to say what that demand is, other than people "having expectations"?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17673
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #337 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 8:52pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 8:43pm:
They have risen and fallen.


I notice you didn't reference electricity prices in Germany. Winkfreediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 8:43pm:
The prices given for wind power on that wikipedia page - the ones you tricked yourself into thinking are not real and therefor you should not include them in your comparison - they are the real prices, and even at the high end are cheaper than nuclear.


Ok. The price for offshore wind up to $216/MWh. Let alone the price for wind distribution.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Nowhere did I say or even indicate they weren't real. Even at average offshore wind is dearer than nuclear. Just because you refuse to believe the price of wind distribution which has to be added to wind price. Unless you mean the electricity will not be collected. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49069
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #338 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 9:03pm
 
Quote:
The price for offshore wind up to $216/MWh.


So you keep saying. What makes you think offshore wind is even relevant for Australia right now? Is this some kind of obsession that coalition supporters have where they always have to focus on the most expensive option, rather than what is best for the country?

Quote:
Nowhere did I say or even indicate they weren't real.


Yes you did. That was your argument for leaving them out of your comparison. You quoted the price for distributed wind power systems and left out the price for conventional wind, claiming that distributed is the only possible option for wind. You still haven't really explained your logic there. You got your panties in a bunch when I asked you about it.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17673
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #339 - Mar 22nd, 2024 at 9:52pm
 
freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 9:03pm:
What makes you think offshore wind is even relevant for Australia right now?


Because it is in the plans of both NSW and Victoria. It has better wind characteristics but has higher costs.

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 9:03pm:
Is this some kind of obsession that coalition supporters have where they always have to focus on the most expensive option, rather than what is best for the country?


Both NSW and Victoria have Labor Governments. Roll Eyes

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 9:03pm:
Yes you did. That was your argument for leaving them out of your comparison.


Then you should have no trouble providing the exact quotes. Wink

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 9:03pm:
You quoted the price for distributed wind power systems and left out the price for conventional wind, claiming that distributed is the only possible option for wind.


And it is because wind farms are large, you have to have the distribution system to capture the electricity.

Remember you said it was only small turbines?

"Distributed wind energy is a distributed energy resource, meaning it produces a smaller-scale unit of power. In this case, it comprises one or more wind turbines, which range from a kilowatt to several megawatts in capacity. "

https://www.nrel.gov/research/re-wind.html

Or this -

"Definition of Distributed Wind in IEA Task 41
• Wind turbines deployed in a distributed application
• Connected at a distribution voltage (nominally 70 kV) or below
• Behind the meter, in front of the meter, or in an off-grid application.
• In this context, DW is inclusive of all scales of wind turbine technologies and is agnostic to business model, although in some instances, such as technology standards, more specific industry segregation is included."

https://iea-wind.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Distributed-Wind-integration-to-...

In Australia they are operated at 33KV, so they are distributed.

https://aemo.com.au/-/media/files/electricity/nem/security_and_reliability/repor...

Figure7-1 and 7-2.

freediver wrote on Mar 22nd, 2024 at 9:03pm:
You got your panties in a bunch when I asked you about it.


Nope. I just ignored you. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49069
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #340 - Mar 23rd, 2024 at 5:04am
 
lee wrote on Mar 19th, 2024 at 12:20pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 18th, 2024 at 9:50pm:
But not this one?

Wind power $27–75


Because I used Distributed Generation (wind) because as I said wind turbines cannot be co-located. Have a look at the definition it is highlighted, pass the cursor over it. Note: It doesn't say wind turbines cannot be co-located, so if you have a site that disagrees please provide it. Roll Eyes

Perhaps a single wind turbine would work for you. Wink


Lee is this you tricking yourself into believing the $25-75 electricity price from wind given by the wikipedia article does not actually exist?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29645
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #341 - Mar 23rd, 2024 at 8:12am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 2:18pm:
Do you think the coalition wants to outdo them for wasting taxpayers money?

Were you simply trying to deceive everyone when you left the most common, and cheapest price for wind power out of your comparison with nuclear? Do you think the coalition is as duplicitous as you when it comes to electricity costs, because they are appealing to the "easily confused" demographic?

Why do you insist it is free to store radioactive waste, and up to others to prove otherwise? Who do you think is offering to store radioactive waste for free? Do you think the coalition's plan involves dumping nuclear waste in the nearest creek?

Why do you think we should go with nuclear, despite the dangers and unsolved problems with the waste, and our lack of experience with it, when it is already one of the most expensive options, and the others are all getting cheaper at such a rate that nuclear is close to being obsolete?


And you think we have experience with wind & solar?  Grin Grin

If we did we wouldn't be going down this ridiculous path. The is a massive recycling waste problem coming with them.

Wind & solar are not cheap and it's not reliable.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49069
At my desk.
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #342 - Mar 23rd, 2024 at 8:20am
 
Quote:
And you think we have experience with wind & solar?


A lot more than we do with nuclear power. Plus, it is not about to go obsolete.

Quote:
The is a massive recycling waste problem coming with them.


They do not produce radioactive waste. And you do not have to recycle them if you don't want to.

Quote:
Wind & solar are not cheap and it's not reliable.


Do you think the wikipedia article on prices is wrong?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29645
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #343 - Mar 23rd, 2024 at 8:36am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 20th, 2024 at 3:04pm:
Gas would make sense. It has much lower GHG emissions than coal, and generally works better at supplying irregular peak demand, so would be a good one to throw in the mix with renewables and various storage options.


Gas is also a fossil fuel ..... no?

Hydraulic fracked gas is dirtier than coal. It's just that you don't get to see what it does hidden underground. And rogue(escaping) gases cannot been seen with the human eye.

The the threat of contamination to underground aquifers is exponential. Be wonderful for the country if the  CSG industry contaminate the Great Artesian Basin.

Then there's the lunatic idea called coal seam gasification ...... where they ignite coal seams underground & collect the escaping gases.

That was fortunately banned after a trial in QLD.... but then the idiots in Sth Australia thought that might be a good idea down there - no one learns. Roll Eyes

Renewable fanatics rave about the environmental eyesore of open cut mines & conveniently for get the 1000's of acres of eyesores on the landscape that wind & solar farms create. Plus all the new corridors bulldozed for the extensive powerlines & substations to hook them onto the grid.

We have the coal - but we can't use it
We have the gas - but we can't use it

We sell it to other countries who use it to generate power ...

countries whose emissions we don't even compare to because our are so small.

And we go down the path of so called renewables to an unreliable power future .... where we will end up as a net importer of everything.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29645
Gender: male
Re: Coalition's 10 Year Nuclear Claim Is A Dream
Reply #344 - Mar 23rd, 2024 at 8:38am
 
freediver wrote on Mar 23rd, 2024 at 8:20am:
Quote:
And you think we have experience with wind & solar?


A lot more than we do with nuclear power. Plus, it is not about to go obsolete.

Quote:
The is a massive recycling waste problem coming with them.


They do not produce radioactive waste. And you do not have to recycle them if you don't want to.

Quote:
Wind & solar are not cheap and it's not reliable.


Do you think the wikipedia article on prices is wrong?


Depends of where it was sourced.

Figures lie & liars figure.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26
Send Topic Print