freediver wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2025 at 9:40pm:


Can't you read?

Note: both sides in war slaughter the other, until one side wins.

freediver wrote on Feb 5^th, 2025 at 10:38am:


The problem is not my English skills but your crippled comprehension skills, and inability to understand causes -  itself the result of your blind delusional "freedom" ideology - delusional because individual freedom/rights cannot exist except under law, if there  is more than one individual in the world. 

And speaking of law, it's been amazing listening to  radio today:  practically  everyone from the Jewish Council of Oz, to Sky News,  as well as UN reps,  have condemend Trump's Gaza plans.

Ie,  despite Jasin' contempt for interantional  law, everyone except the extreme rabid right is at least paying lip servcie to it, and regard Trump as taking us back to before 1945 when 'might was right' and land grabs by colonizing powers were the norm.

[Unfortunately these same leaders don't understand WHY international law has failed to institute peace and security.]

Back to the Chinese civil war: revolution leads to war against the status quo, eg in France in 1789, one of the King's more far-sighted economic advisers told the King to raise taxes on the aristocracy...the King listened, but gave way to the aristocracy who resisted, resulting in the 'reign of terror' and the destruction of the Monarchy - aka the French Revolution. 

A century later, after Europe had industrialized, educated Marxist revolutionaries mounted revolutions in the still backward  subsistence agricultural economies of  Russia and China in which  the vast majority of people were poverty-stricken  serfs oppressed by the ruling class.

Back  to your ill-formed  question, namely:

"So the CCP did not deliberately slaughter tens of millions of Chinese people because they did actually do it, but the other side did it as well?"

Answer: well....yes (leaving aside the issue of "deliberate"); if an oppressor (ruling class)  won't take his hands  off your neck, you fight back however you can. 

And unfortunately,  international law still can't deal with oppressors.



   


 

freediver wrote on Feb 6^th, 2025 at 9:55am:


YOUR error in logic:   you noted "the other side did it as well".

Are you denying Nationalists and Commies slaughtered oneanother?

Quote:


Your question in its original form denies reality, as explained (again) above.

freediver wrote on Feb 10^th, 2025 at 8:37am:


Wrong -  it is a dumb question which denies reality, as expected from a delusional "individual freedom" ideologue.

How else could Marxists introduce 'an economy which works for all" (the Marxist ideal) in China in 1949?

The Nationalist  capitalist pigs wanted to maintain their own privileged positions in post imperial China, so the Commies fought the self-interested capitalist bastards (my use of highly-charged  ideological terms is deliberate, you blind "individual freedom" ideologue.....)   
Quote:


See above.

Now prove to us you ARE ideologically blind, by repeating your dumb question ad nauseam....

You need to keep abreast of developments and debates in the present global reality, examined in the last few MMT posts (with  increasing numbers of views now over 100K, apparently). 

freediver wrote on Feb 11^th, 2025 at 8:04am:


Outline for us what you consider 'appears' to  be 2 completely different answers to your (dumb) question.

Speaking of which :

TGD: "Now prove to us you ARE ideologically blind, by repeating your dumb question ad nauseam.   

Quote:


Bingo - right on cue, as predicted.

freediver wrote on Feb 11^th, 2025 at 10:21am:


No, I'm saying your blind 'individual freedom' delusions - fully exposed in the 'foundations' thread as well as in this thread, but ignored by you - is the reason you ask endless stupid questions,  which we all have experienced from you on Ozpol in many different threads.

Now you are simply resorting to repeating  the same stupid question ad nauseam.

Deplorable, a good example of the psychosis underlying the "human condition" (endless wars, entrenched poverty) as examined by Jeremy Griffiths (google, for those who want to learn, FD is beyond reach).

freediver wrote on Feb 12^th, 2025 at 10:13am:


No - allowing for the fact the question is dumb because you are ignoring responsibility -  because self-interested capitalist pigs (like you) who insisted on maintaining  their economic privileges in the nation's subsistence agrarian economy,  FORCED the commies to fight for common prosperity (the Marxist ideal).

Your ideological blinkers prevent you from examining  WHO was responsible for the ensuing slaughter.   

Quote:


Your question is still  dumb as explained many times, perhaps each time you ask we make a tiny bit of progress.

eg I have elucidated, once again, the issue of responsibility for the slaughter in a civil war. 

Apropos: in this case we have established your blind, survival of the fittest, delusional "individual freedom" ideology was responsible for the civil war. 

[....the travails of educating the blind man....(who also can't see why Palestinians resisted the confiscation of part of their land  in 1947...it's a basic human instinct, like fighting to ovecome  economic privilege and injustice].