freediver wrote on Mar 27
th, 2024 at 5:25pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 27
th, 2024 at 4:44pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 27
th, 2024 at 4:18pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 26
th, 2024 at 1:36pm:
[quote author=freediver link=1710901371/55#55 date=1711319893]
Do you mean the same thing as the CCP when you say common prosperity?
Yes.
Quote:Are you aware of anything you have posted on this forum that contradicts CCP policy?
Yes - example given, which YOU agree with!
What was the example?
CCP view of UNSC veto (that it should exist); do try to read posts before replying.
Quote:What is the 'one CCP policy' you said you were addressing? (Common prosperity) is a goal, not a policy. Unless you think the CCP policy is to predict the future and cross their fingers?
The policies - to achieve the goal - are outlined in the five year plans.
You have no policies to achieve that goal in Oz.
So the "one CCP policy" you were addressing is actually several of their 5 year plans?
So we might be able to nail this down:
The CCP has "common prosperity" as a goal.
I have "common prosperity" as a goal.
The West - blinded by its
free market ideology - doesn't have "common prosperity" as a goal.
[
"The markets make good servants but bad masters, and a worse religion": Amory Lovins.]
As to policies to achieve "common prosperity", I like MMT, and I'm pleased to see a former PBofC executive (who spoke at the recent '2 sessions' in Beijing) is also aware of MMT, as a tool to avoid a Japanese-style
deflationary 'lost decades' episode (after their 1990 real-estate crash).
Quote:What views have you posted on the UNSC veto, and how do they differ from the CCP's?
That the veto should be scrapped, as per Doc Evatt's original plan for the proposed UNSC, in 1946. (Evatt was a former Oz High Court judge, active in the creation of the UN).
The CCP rejects the West's (and your) "shared belief" in the
'rules based order', when the rules are based on your 'natural individual rights'** delusion. Hence the CCP might want to retain its UNSC veto.
**'Natural'...meaning 'self-evident' (as graps pointed out); but delusions aren't self-evident for the deluded.