Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 28
th, 2024 at 2:37pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Oct 28
th, 2024 at 1:13pm:
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 28
th, 2024 at 1:03pm:
Keep clinging to your party line - it's the only hope you have - remote though it is in reality.
The People Are Speaking - a wise man listens. A Rubicon was crossed after the 'voice' votedown - and Caesar is struggling...
Even if you can show that their vote was
based on your obsessive fixation on holding down Indigenous people, it doesn't change what the Uluru Statement is, what the Voice proposal was and what we voted for in the referendum.
We vote for state representation, not some magic wizardry that resets facts to something less difficult for you to accept.
You are so right:-
https://www.skynews.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Document-14-1.pdfRead it and weep. Every unwarranted demand laid bare in their own words.
First, let’s clarify, The Uluru Statement from the Heart is not synonymous with "The Voice."
The Voice is merely an element of the Uluru Statement.
We've revisited this distinction countless times.
Second, what you’re referencing is not the Uluru Statement itself. The Uluru Statement from the Heart is a single-page document, as confirmed by its authors.
The additional pages you've cited, released under FOI, contain supplementary materials, including meeting minutes and background information from discussions with Indigenous communities. These documents provide context but are not part of the Uluru Statement itself.
Once again, you've resorted to misrepresenting the facts to bolster your argument, and yet again, you’ve failed spectacularly.
Quote:Your problem if you vote for state representation and then permit them to act like Nazis or Kommissars - We, The People demand better and on such sweeping issues we WILL be consulted and have our say in a clear vote. Kommissars and Nazis OUT!
Two points are evident here. Firstly, congratulations on a textbook invocation of Godwin's Law. Secondly, it’s curious to see someone who has previously ranted about government "dilution" of the Australian gene suddenly taking issue with Nazis.
It's interesting you will borrow from their playbook one moment then reject it the next.
Your argument is scattered and contradictory today.
Take a step back, breathe, and return when you can reply with a more composed and rational response, free from the emotional theatrics.