Likely professional terrorists that would kill anybody for a few dollars.

Russian is one of the languages of Tajikistan which explains why they were able to move freely in Russia.

Still some unanswered questions:

1. Who financed the operation?
2. Which banks were used in the transactions?
3. These people were recruited in Turkey by who?
4. Is Turkey the R&R stop for terrorists between assignments? If so, why is this allowed?
5. More people may have been involved to support the terrorists ahead of the incident.
6. Why does Turkey allow known Terrorists to exist in Turkey?

The most important question is: if the USA knew about this operation as they claimed why did it not act against the terrorist group?

The USA has become silent on this issue since it confessed to its own complicity.

The USA evidently has a military association with Tajikistan, and Tajikistanis probably work for the USA military and other agencies.

... TAJIKISTAN  –  Soldiers with the Armed Forces of the Republic of Tajikistan and the U.S. Army worked together in a 24-hour operation to share tactics, techniques and procedures, April 24, 2018.This exercise was part of a three-week, military-to-military engagement between the Tajikistan Peacekeeping Battalion of the Mobile Forces and the 648th Military Engagement Team, Georgia Army National Guard, involving border security and mountain warfare techniques. ...

What if these Tajikistani terrorists had been trained by the US military and had weapons and ammunition supplied by the US military?

That would create a public humiliation of the USA's hypocrisy in using terrorists while claiming to fight terrorism.

The first lesson is to heed other nations’ intelligence warnings – provided in this case by the US about Islamic State planning of an attack in Moscow. The Russian Federal Security Service, the FSB, had earlier thwarted a planned ISIS attack on a Moscow synagogue and might have thought the intelligence provided related to that planned attack.

Admittedly, the intelligence provided also was probably very general – along the lines of “ISIS is discussing a mass casualty attack in Moscow”.
...

The second lesson is that some of the security guards at mass gatherings need to be armed. At the Crocus City Hall none of the security guards was armed.

...
The third lesson is the need for a quick response.  The Special Rapid Response and Special Purposes Mobile units took an hour to get to the theatre, by which time the four attackers had long gone. Apparently the response was delayed because of heavy Moscow traffic. Response capabilities need to get to the scene of a major incident much more quickly.


The fourth lesson is that venues need to be prepared for a rapid evacuation and all emergency exits need to be readily accessible. The emergency exits at the hall were locked, presumably to prevent them being used by people trying to get into what was a sold-out event.

The fifth lesson is the need for a timely government response. The delayed response by Russian President Vladimir Putin made it obvious the government was going to try to spin the situation to its advantage, in this case blaming Ukraine, because it supports Putin’s campaign to tarnish Ukraine and convince the Russian population that Ukraine poses an existential threat to Russia’s security.

Putin’s threat to punish Ukraine was intended for a domestic audience as it was not credible that Ukraine would have been behind the attack. (Ukraine’s attacks on Russia have been against military and energy targets, not against civilians at public events.)
...

Despite Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s claim the border is heavily defended, Ukraine is in fact quite accessible for people on foot. (I visited the area in 2019.) Had the attackers made it to the Ukraine border, they probably would have had local Muslim support to help them escape. Tracking the vehicle would have been facilitated by automatic numberplate recognition cameras around Moscow and on major highways.

More recent Russian vehicle numberplates also can have a built-in chip that transmits information about the car even if the numbers are deliber­ately soiled with mud (a common Russian ploy to avoid tolls).

Responsibility for the attack has been convincingly claimed by Islamic State Khorasan Province, also known as ISIS-K, based in Afghanistan. The group has been growing in strength since the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan and now numbers up to 6000 members. Unfortunately, every successful ISIS-K terrorist attack helps its recruitment.

Clive Williams is director of the Terrorism Research Centre.

Putin is on the trail

Judophile Frank is on fire. His Mossad handlers have squeezed his testicles to cause him to lift his game.

Judophile Frank is turning every thread into Jewish propaganda.

Russia is implicating the USA and the UK as possible instigators of the terrorist attack in Moscow.

The US is exposed by association with military operations it was conducting in association with Tajikistan. The USA may have trained the perpetrators.

The full operations of the US military are unknown because the US military does not respond to any control over its activities.

The US, UK and Ukraine may have been behind last Friday’s terrorist attack on a concert venue in a suburb of Moscow, which claimed lives of 139 people and left around 200 injured, according to the head of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB).Aleksandr Bortnikov told reporters on Tuesday that the authorities are currently trying to establish the identity of everyone involved in the attack, both inside and outside Russia.When asked whether the US, Britain and Ukraine could be behind the terrorist attack, the FSB chief responded: “We think that this is so. In any case, we are now talking about the information that we have. This is general information, but they [investigators] also have concrete results.”

“they [Washington] have exposed themselves.”

The US has exposed itself as being complicit by claiming to have information that it is not making public by declaring that Ukraine was not involved.

Russia has fingered the US and UK as at least being complicit.

The military leaders of the USA and UK do not respond to control by higher authorities and kill and attack any entity they choose with impunity.

https://www.rt.com/russia/595005-us-bias-crocus-shooting/

Quote: