Quote:


Was that his only other option crappler? You said you worked as a boucer,  did you have to carry the drunk girls home?

You keep making excuses for rapists.

Now then, poppets - let's look at this one in five women who suffer sexual violence.... starting with the worst state...

The NT ..... 30.8% of the population there, all one demographic, are responsible for 93% of the women deaths since 2000 ... it is a safe bet that all other forms of violence are in the same percentage... so yer Blecks in their communities (not my words - the Coroner's) are responsible for 93% ....so then we move to the next most likely demographic for sexual violence against women - the lunatic, wild-eyed, leso community (not all of them), which operates around domination and abuse... (go get pissed on in the shower) ....   remove the criminally minded - the Measters and Indios who feel sex is a right etc and abuse and rape (in some cases) are perfectly in order and the relatively few Wharte boys who engage in this kind of thing .....  ... and it's becoming fair to say that there are only a very few of such cases that are down to the group having the finger pointed at them.... majority white men.  Then there are repeat offenders.

If we extrapolate those figures on Blecks to the Civilised Tribes States- civilised because only 4% of them are Bleck Aussies though there are a high number of imports among offenders - say we divide that 93% by 7.5 (roughly 30.8% divided by 4%)- and for that tiny minority we still have a 13-odd% perpetration rate of sexual violence in that 'community', along with a similar rate of women deaths in those communities/social groups.

So let us look at the current approach to this and all other 'social issues' - I call it the Helicopter Approach  ... to achieve this you assemble a crowd of the group you WISH to target and create into perpetrators of your pet idea; crowd them into a stadium; bring in a chopper that hovers at 200 feet above them, and then throw the contents of an opened can of paint out of each side door into the raging slipstream ...... all those who are struck by paint are guilty of stealing paint..... easy as pie.  The ones who escape being hit?  Easy as pie - they are just cunning enough to not be splashed and rounded up, and thus are a greater danger.

On the other hand, people like my excellent self - who some love to abuse and name-call since they have nothing else to offer - asks - "Where are your facts and hard figures by demographic?  How do you ever expect to get to the roots(sic) of sexual violence unless you clearly identify your genuine perpetrators?".

Then - horror of horrors - we have to sort out and resolve all the false and wrongful complaints - the Lehrmann 'convictions' by accusation without proof - so - at the end of the day and as usual - there are precious few incidents left for the overwhelming majority.... but you must never let that deter you from attacking them all - especially when there are benefits in it like preference for sweet jobs, social standing, even rewards for 'coming forward bravely',  the opportunity for world domination if you are a lunatic feminist, and the clear opportunity to gain control over society in the West and reap the benefits you imagine will follow - even though the majority will never see those benefits.

All Madness...

It's the reason for having judges and juries. Otherwise, what? Search [Lehrmann guilty rape] and google tells you? Judge Google?

Nothing like being in the privileged pay set to have that kind of money lying around - we all know that money will buy you a decision.... and someone of 'standing' in the community has a far better chance than a bloke with piggy eyes... Toowoomba you say?  He's got no hope...

Once again ; 'The court’s judgment clarified the distinction between criminal and civil liabilities, emphasising that while the criminal case remained inconclusive, the civil proceedings necessitated a lesser degree of certainty.'

Sometimes a call has to be made and most sexual cases are like this one. It comes down to 49:51 and that's for liability for defamation, not criminal rape.

I don't make the laws, there's a little green man under parliament house who does that, getting on in years a bit. Lehrmann asked for a judicial opinion without first checking with Grappler.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 27^th, 2024 at 12:45pm:


I think he will be acquitted of the Toowoomba charge.

The events still do establish what a loser low life he is, and where he socialises and with whom.

chimera wrote on May 27^th, 2024 at 3:37pm:



Well - you see - there's a 'lesser degree of certainty' and there is NO certainty at all..... in this case the sole evidence was a single intoxicated statement made long after the event, not reported to authorities, no corroborating evidence, nothing whatsoever to support the simple assertion - and that is NO certainty at all in any court, civil or otherwise.

The only certainty in that 'court' was the biased and politically motivated 'opinion' of the 'judge'.

Would you equally apply the same standard to Witness B if she were charged with making a false complaint and public mischief etc?  You'd be in the baying and mindless crowd screeching from the rooftops about such vile treatment - the barbarians at the gates of the courts intimidating judges and all others with their screaming and threats of action and adverse media nonsense - but you'd hang Bruce on the same standard and see his life ruined, as you have done.

I, of course, would be saying the same thing - without substantial corroborating evidence and at least some action taken in a timely fashion, there is ZERO solid and reliable evidence by any standard to convict the girl.  That is the clear difference between you lot of witch hunters and myself.... in any crisis I remain calm and detached - you turn hysterical... start crying for blood but only one way.

Just what kind of man are you?

A. - a Modern New Fascist.