Australian Politics Forum - The Trump Bible

Marla Gold Member Offline Weed is my Jesus Posts: 13494 Colorado Gender:	Re: The Trump Bible Reply #15 - Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:15am Wacky Christians finally grow up May be hope for America yet.
Back to top	I know progress has no patience but something's got to give IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95326
Gender: male

Re: The Trump Bible
Reply #16 - Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:34am

chimera wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 9:23am:

Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers.

Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella?

He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name.

We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34428
Gender: male

Re: The Trump Bible
Reply #17 - Apr 28^th, 2024 at 6:36am

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:34am:

chimera wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 9:23am:

Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers.

Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella?

He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name.

We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no?

the clinton foundation Grin

pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island

the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators),

why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA.

i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95326
Gender: male

Re: The Trump Bible
Reply #18 - Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:13pm

aquascoot wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 6:36am:

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:34am:

chimera wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 9:23am:

Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers.

Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella?

He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name.

We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no?

the clinton foundation Grin

pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island

the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators),

why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA.

i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies

Sorry, Aquascoot, do you mean the Clinton Foundation, assessed to be a

top rated charity

by independent monitors?

No Deep State there, dear, Charity Watch works for donors. The Clinton Foundation has an independent board, publishes annual audits and reports, meets all government benchmarks and is assessed as open and transparent.

The Clinton Foundation is totally on the level, dear. I've just shown you how. If you beg to differ, you'll need to explain how your gossip was missed by the auditors and independent evaluators.

In fact, if I was you I wouldn't wait. I'd be typing out a stern email to Charity Watch. I'd be asking them how they could possibly miss all this blatant corruption you keep alluding to, and do you know?

I wouldn't mind betting you get a reply. I'd like to see that reply.

You want to give it a stab?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 44864
Gender: male

Re: The Trump Bible
Reply #19 - Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:51pm

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:13pm:

aquascoot wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 6:36am:

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:34am:

chimera wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 9:23am:

Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers.

Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella?

He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name.

We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no?

the clinton foundation Grin

pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island

the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators),

why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA.

i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies

Sorry, Aquascoot, do you mean the Clinton Foundation, assessed to be a

top rated charity

by independent monitors?

No Deep State there, dear, Charity Watch works for donors. The Clinton Foundation has an independent board, publishes annual audits and reports, meets all government benchmarks and is assessed as open and transparent.

The Clinton Foundation is totally on the level, dear. I've just shown you how. If you beg to differ, you'll need to explain how your gossip was missed by the auditors and independent evaluators.

In fact, if I was you I wouldn't wait. I'd be typing out a stern email to Charity Watch. I'd be asking them how they could possibly miss all this blatant corruption you keep alluding to, and do you know?

I wouldn't mind betting you get a reply. I'd like to see that reply.

You want to give it a stab?

'ello, 'ello, 'ello, whassis, then?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Controversies

Mr Hard Dog to Keep on the Porch himself.

How much did he pay Paul az Jones? $880,000.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Apr 28^th, 2024 at 8:24pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

chimera Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 11084 armidale Gender:	Re: The Trump Bible Reply #20 - Apr 28^th, 2024 at 5:08pm The Oxford English Dictionary added "nothingburger" as a valid word to its dictionary. Merriam-Webster dictionary is considering the word in the future but there's nothing in it.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95326
Gender: male

Re: The Trump Bible
Reply #21 - Apr 28^th, 2024 at 5:49pm

Frank wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:51pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:13pm:

aquascoot wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 6:36am:

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:34am:

chimera wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 9:23am:

Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers.

Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella?

He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name.

We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no?

the clinton foundation Grin

pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island

the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators),

why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA.

i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies

Sorry, Aquascoot, do you mean the Clinton Foundation, assessed to be a

top rated charity

by independent monitors?

No Deep State there, dear, Charity Watch works for donors. The Clinton Foundation has an independent board, publishes annual audits and reports, meets all government benchmarks and is assessed as open and transparent.

The Clinton Foundation is totally on the level, dear. I've just shown you how. If you beg to differ, you'll need to explain how your gossip was missed by the auditors and independent evaluators.

In fact, if I was you I wouldn't wait. I'd be typing out a stern email to Charity Watch. I'd be asking them how they could possibly miss all this blatant corruption you keep alluding to, and do you know?

I wouldn't mind betting you get a reply. I'd like to see that reply.

You want to give it a stab?

'ello, 'ello, 'ello, whassis, then?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Controversies

Mr Hard Dog to Keep on the Porch himself.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/83/Bill_Clinton_portrait_...

That's a Wikipedia article, dear boy. It says that wealthy donors have been a source of "controversy".

Would you like to dob the Clinton Foundation in? You might knock a point off it's B+ rating.

Until then, can you explain where the Trump Foundation is?

All presidents have them. Where's your DL's?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 136576
Gender: male

Re: The Trump Bible
Reply #22 - Apr 28^th, 2024 at 8:35pm

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 5:49pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:51pm:

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:13pm:

aquascoot wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 6:36am:

Karnal wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:34am:

chimera wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2024 at 9:23am:

Any funds received by DTrump as licensee will go directly to the needy porn stars and sexual assault victims. None will be used for state document storage, bank applications or lawyers.

Good point, Chimera. Clinton, Bush and Obama all set up charitable foundations after they left office to help those most in need. The big fella?

He's banned from setting up a foundation - at least in New York. The first US president since I-don't-know who didn't establish a charity in his name, and the first former president who's had charities banned in his name.

We'll give so much we'll grow tired of giving, no?

the clinton foundation Grin

pretending to go dig wells for the pygmies but really just heading to epstein island

the biggest is the gates foundation (another mate of jeffs) doing experiments on african kiddies genes and using crispa gene editing to practice eugenics on the worlds poorest people (out of sight of western regulators),

why wouldnt the intelligence agencies compromise people like gates and clinton so they can "keep up' with china on their own set of laboratory mice (afrcian children).they certainly couldnt do it in the USA.

i suppose people still believe that gates and zuckerburg started off in a garage , when in fact they signed deals worth 100's of millions right back at the start that meant they were always patsys for the intelligence agencies

Sorry, Aquascoot, do you mean the Clinton Foundation, assessed to be a

top rated charity

by independent monitors?

No Deep State there, dear, Charity Watch works for donors. The Clinton Foundation has an independent board, publishes annual audits and reports, meets all government benchmarks and is assessed as open and transparent.

The Clinton Foundation is totally on the level, dear. I've just shown you how. If you beg to differ, you'll need to explain how your gossip was missed by the auditors and independent evaluators.

In fact, if I was you I wouldn't wait. I'd be typing out a stern email to Charity Watch. I'd be asking them how they could possibly miss all this blatant corruption you keep alluding to, and do you know?

I wouldn't mind betting you get a reply. I'd like to see that reply.

You want to give it a stab?

'ello, 'ello, 'ello, whassis, then?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Controversies

Mr Hard Dog to Keep on the Porch himself.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/83/Bill_Clinton_portrait_...

That's a Wikipedia article, dear boy. It says that wealthy donors have been a source of "controversy".

Would you like to dob the Clinton Foundation in? You might knock a point off it's B+ rating.

Until then, can you explain where the Trump Foundation is?

All presidents have them. Where's your DL's?

Frank?

Back to top

IP Logged