MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28
th, 2024 at 10:58am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28
th, 2024 at 10:54am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28
th, 2024 at 10:47am:
John Smith wrote on Apr 28
th, 2024 at 10:43am:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28
th, 2024 at 10:40am:
John Smith wrote on Apr 28
th, 2024 at 10:18am:
I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.
No, it didn't.
A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction.
The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men.
Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing.
Sure you missed the point. That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you
I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid.
The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you.
Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing?
Have you got it in you to maul or kill a woman?
This is not about a particular man or a particular bear - it's about men and bears in general, and what they are capable of as a species.
I asked you a very simple question:
Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing?The answer is 'yes'.
A bear will not rape or torture. They won't tie a woman up and devise evil ways to make her suffer.
Now ask yourself: is a man capable of raping and/or torturing a woman?
Could a woman scare away a bear? Could they scare away a man?
Has the penny dropped yet?
The very worst a bear can do to a woman is maul and kill her.
A man, on the other hand, can do that and much more.
I perfectly understand why women are choosing the bear.
Forum
Pages: 
