freediver wrote on May 9^th, 2024 at 4:24pm:



Because it's Israel's fault, quibbling over the meaning of  UN res 242 way back in 1967  -  which was responsible for Hamas' creation 2 decades later.

Quote:



Er - most countries, like China, have not designated Hamas a terrorist organisation.

And most countries, including  China, now want all parties  (including Hamas) to implement UN res 242.

You? 

Try again. 

freediver wrote on May 9^th, 2024 at 6:25pm:


Well...it takes two to tango, which is why we need international law.

But you - being  deluded by your posited "subjective" awareness of freedom - as opposed to freedom based on morality, justice and fairness - are incapable of adjudicating  right or wrong, or cause and effect.

So in your view, the Judeo-Christian imperialism which resulted in Israel's creation in 1947 is the natural order; others see it differently.

Quote:


Quote:


No - you are having trouble understanding the concept of  adjudication to establish  'morality, justice and fairness' between different cultures, to engender the  freedom of both.  

freediver wrote on May 10^th, 2024 at 12:31pm:


Those others being those who want UN res 242 implemented  - ie the international law which adjudicated on the conflict.

Quote:


Your error exposed above: "others see it the same way" - you didn't specify which others (...either as part of your deliberate use of fraud, or low IQ).

Implementation of UN res 242 was derailed by quibbling over the meaning of "territories occupied",  as opposed to  "the terittories occupied" (in the 1967 war).

(apparently a translation problem  from French to English: but the Israeli's milked the dispute over meaning for all it was worth...).   

Quote:


Er... you forgot the matter of the occupation of the WB after 1967, while Israel "went ahead and built a functioning state" - actions which are responsible for the creation of (reactionary) Hamas, because Israel was guibbling all that time over the meaning of "occupied territories" , as noted above.   

Quote:


Er - interntional law...oh never mind, delusional  "subjective freedom" ideologues like you reject international law.

Quote:


I see moderate Islamists and the CCP all agreeing that all parties including Hamas and the f**kwits in Netanyahu's RW cabinet need to institute UN res 242.

China's Thousandfold Guantánamos
With China's assault on scores of leading academics and intellectuals, business as usual is no longer possible, writes Magnus Fiskesjö.

The recent mass arrests of scores of leading academics and intellectuals in western China is one of many indications that the Chinese regime's current campaign against the native Uighur, Kazakh and other peoples is already a genocide. It is now clearly engaged in "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such," as defined in the 1948 international Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2019/04/08/universities-should-not-ignore-c...

freediver wrote on May 10^th, 2024 at 1:15pm:


Now you are getting there....slowly. The UN professed to be the agency of international law, post 1945.

But the UN should never have voted to partition Palestine, without the machinerty in place to establish the articles of the law (namely, UN res 181). 

Quote:


No. The CCP wants to solve the conflict, criticizing Hamas won't establish UN 242.   

Quote:


Moderate Muslims are now also keen to solve the conflict. 

Quote:


Because it's an elephant of your own making.

freediver wrote on May 8^th, 2024 at 8:05pm:



How can Australia exercise "power and authority over China"?
Australia better not mess with China. China is too strong for you.

capitosinora wrote on May 10^th, 2024 at 1:30pm:


The only way Australia can defeat China is with free 'pussy'.
Just like you Americans offer it to the Africans.