freediver wrote on May 20
th, 2024 at 2:01pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on May 20
th, 2024 at 11:49am:
freediver wrote on May 20
th, 2024 at 11:40am:
thegreatdivide wrote on May 20
th, 2024 at 11:25am:
freediver wrote on May 19
th, 2024 at 9:30pm:
TGD, how exactly do you "negotiate" with a belligerent country that keeps invading? Are you suggesting that the Ukraine give up bit and pieces of it's territory to Russia every 10 years?
See the 'responsible statecraft" link again.
It takes two to tango; Putin was ready to negotiate in 2014 but NATO rejected it.
Your 2nd question ignores the answer to the first.
What was he ready to "negotiate"? The UN surrendering to him whatever he demands?
You are ignoring the timeline - and the link.
Originally (soon after the collapse of the USSR) Putin sought admission to NATO and was rebuffed. Later when the Kiev government chose closer relations with NATO, Putin saw his 'buffer' between Russia and NATO disappearing. Read the link.
You - being a blind
individual freedom ideologue, won't understand any of this; it's "freedom or death" because war is the best way to settle a dispute.....
So it is Ukraine's fault for not letting Russia dictate their foreign policy to them?
No, it is Ukraine's - and NATO's - fault for not negotiating re the status of Russian speaking provinces in Ukraine.
Your error: Ukraine's society was deeply divided over pro Western or pro Russian sympathies.
Negotiation ....admittedly not understandable by a "freedom or death"/national sovereignty ideologue like both you... and Putin, for that matter. Off to war you go.
Quote:Doesn't this just prove the the Ukraine was right to avoid Russia as much as possible?
I love these endless questions coming from the ideologically crippled "freedom or death" brain; it's fun to dispose of them.
Answer: no, it proves Zelensky should have negotiated with Putin instead of being led up the garden path by the Pentagon which loves a proxy war with Russia (avoiding any damage to the US).
Quote:Are you straddling the fence with your legs in the air on this because you want the CCP to also be able to bully smaller countries on foreign policy matters? And then blame them if the CCP is "forced" to invade because they lose face?
No. The CCP wants to avoid war, and engage in negotiation, since war is the ultimate insanity for the combatants on either side - witness the destruction of life and property in Ukraine, and Russian losses in treasure and life.
The US of course is busy arming some of China's near neighbours, because they like you are "freedom or death' delusional ideologues, and take every opportunity to create chaos and war in the SCS, but we'll see if the CCP can draw on ancient Chinese wisdom re war (ie, winning a war without firing a shot).