Thegreatdivide says she's against sov cits but has the same mind-bending word twists. And they both seem to repeat nonsense endlessly to make it factual.  She's invented a new sov cit theory about gun rights, which makes me suspicious.  Mao said power comes from guns, 1927.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 11^th, 2024 at 12:22pm:

That's sovereignty. When the elected term in office expires, who has sovereignty? The government needs to be created anew by citizens. (can you work out the difference between them and 'sovereign citizens'?)

chimera : 'However, China's government repeats nonsense to make it more factual. 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 11^th, 2024 at 12:22pm:

Its fishermen went to sea and own it as far as Borneo. China owns it. China owns it.

chimera wrote on Jun 12^th, 2024 at 5:16pm:


Our city is sacked. May you know it! May you know it!”
Ugarit circa 1200BC.

chimera wrote on Jun 11^th, 2024 at 1:42pm:


'Sovereign citizens' don't regard the concept as "mind bending",  though they are equally as delusional as you re the sovereignty of governments.

Quote:


Your low IQ confirmed: in 1927, Mao was working to  establish government for the prosperity of the Chinese nation which at the time was ravaged by the absolute poverty of over 90% of the population - not to maintain the prosperity of neanderthal, self-interested "freedom or death" individuals who refuse to submit to rule of law.



   

chimera wrote on Jun 12^th, 2024 at 5:16pm:
 

Exactly: "we the citizens come together to create the sovereign government of the US... for the common welfare... "

Quote:


(...proving there ARE such things as dumb questions...):

The care-taker government, until the election results are confirmed.

Quote:


Your error: you are confusing the processes/machinery of sovereign government with the citizens who choose the particular governing party (determined by majority vote in the case of multi-party democracies). 

Sovereignty resides in government, not in the disparate citizens and particular parties which can be turfed out at the next election.

Hence the rest of your post is GIGO....except your final observation, namely:

"China's fishermen  fishermen went to sea and own it as far as Borneo. China owns it."

Again, your fallacy of composition: some, not all of China's "fishermen", claimed sovereignty of the SCS for China, not for their "sovereign"(sic) selves.

Indeed nations claimed sovereignty according to historical adventures and circumstances

But that belongs to pre 1946 history when "might is right" ruled the waves (hence "Britannia rules the waves"...before it no longer did).

Hence the need for an international rules-based order, to avoid endless wars.   

See the blind "freedom or death" chimera twisting and turning.....

chimera wrote on Jun 13^th, 2024 at 2:25pm:


So here we have it: we see how the reptilian brain cripples the cortex brain: chimera can't even acknowledge the answer to his dumb question "When the elected term in office expires, who has sovereignty?"

The reptilian brain in all its blind, primitive force, lately displayed by Netanyahu when he accuses the UN of being "evil".

The human condition...and the child slaughtering goes on.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 12^th, 2024 at 11:57am:



You have made no argument - a union entered into voluntarily may be broken at the will of a party.  If I join a club I can resign from it  - if I join a political party - I can quit.

At least you agree that OUR self-proclaimed 'sovereign citizens' who say they are not part of Australia should be given their own separate space, as a courtesy and a nod to their having been the First Invaders.

It's wrong because it came from your anti-democratic CCP mind-twist. And your self-contradicting dogma, based on insults.