Quote:From what I understand, this was all over a hypothetical, of the state of Israel being moved to Tasmania
Yes. I am moving the State of Israel, just as artificially as it was created in the late 40s by the West to solve the dilemma of what to do with all the displaced European Jews post WW2.
Quote:and the people being supported there,
I am moving the State of Israel to Tasmania, and the people in the currently geographically situated State of Israel can choose between staying where they are, or moving with the State of Israel to Tasmania, where all the neighbours do NOT want to obliterate it.
Quote:rather than on the land that is currently disputed and likely to be in the top 2 frontrunners for the cause of WWIII.
There ya go!
Quote:The west should support the people, not the place?
Or have I got this all wrong?
When the State of Israel moves to Tasmania, and the people who choose to go with it also move to Tasmania, there, in Tasmania, the State of (Tasmania) Israel and ALL the people there get ALL the support the State of Israel currently gets from the West, lock, stock and barrel. I can't imagine any of the current Tasmanian 'natives' complaining. The economy etc there now will go through the roof, instantly!
The people who choose to stay geographically where the former State of Israel artificially existed, surrounded by hostile neighbours in a Stateless area, will have to fend for themselves.
Tasmania is three times larger than the currently situated State of Israel. Plenty of room.
Horse/water.
So it has nothing to do with wanting to kill Jews, but instead, in this hypothetical, accepting the choice made by those who stay behind and their fate which they've chosen is their own?