Bobby. wrote on Jun 14
th, 2024 at 1:45pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 14
th, 2024 at 12:36pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jun 14
th, 2024 at 12:01pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 14
th, 2024 at 11:52am:
And unlike here, they enforce their rules.
Whirlpool is only good for discussion of things like computer problems.
It depends. If you want a sanitised factual discussion, with no conspiracies, personal attacks or discrimination, or even jokes, then WP is great.
Most people here can't post within those guide rails though.
No - when it says -
Quote:Given the potentially emotive nature of many of the threads created here,
it's worth reiterating – no racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, or hate-based discussions.
It implies that a topic cannot even be discussed because some
people may become emotional.
What's the point of having a forum then? -
is it just an echo chamber for woke idiots?
Could it be that Whirlpool is afraid of Govt laws around hate speech?
In that case are the moderators unpaid servants for Big Brother?
Is there a right to free speech in Australia?
Elon Musk refused to be censored by the Australian Govt.
and the case was dropped.
https://www.afr.com/technology/esafety-drops-case-against-musk-s-x-over-bishop-s...Jun 5, 2024
Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has defended her decision to challenge Elon Musk’s X Corp in court after abandoning legal action over the billionaire’s refusal to take down footage of a stabbing at a Sydney church.
Ms Inman Grant said she had made a “strategic decision” to end the Federal Court proceedings, which sought penalties and a permanent injunction to force X to remove footage of bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel being attacked.
X owner Elon Musk has had a win in the Australian courts. Bloomberg
Mr Musk’s team called the decision “a victory for free speech” and the social media site had objected to the “global removal of content that does not violate X’s rules” claiming a win in a test case for the eSafety Commissioner’s powers.
“This case has raised important questions on how legal powers can be used to threaten global censorship of speech, and we are heartened to see that freedom of speech has prevailed,” X’s Global Government Affairs account posted.
The decision to issue the removal notices will now be examined by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT).