freediver wrote on Jun 23
rd, 2024 at 5:56pm:
If they are such fast learners, why did it take 50 million deaths for them to even realise something was up, when anyone who could read an economics textbook would have seen it coming?
The Great Famine in China was rather ironic. The government were trying to increase production of agricultural products. But, their techniques ended up reducing food production.
1. Agricultural technique of overproduction. This led to crops having failed because the crops were competing with each other for soil nutrients.
2. The mass killing of sparrows. The sparrows would be the predator to the crop-eating insects. No sparrows around, the insects were able to destroy crops unopposed.
3. There was a misunderstanding about the amount of grain production. Farmers then shifted to other crops that would have made the farmers more money. The government exported too much grain overseas, for the purpose of increasing foreign capital to invest in the industrialisation.
4. Industrialisation led to farmers moving from farms into industries. The lack of manpower in the farms cut production of agriculture.
5. Same again with the natural disasters. Although flooding did not lead to destruction of crops. There were the matter of 2 million workers (mainly farmers) being ordered to help repair the banks of flood affected rivers. Therefore, farms were not tended.
They learned their lessons. But it took a long time for them to learn. I bet the One Child Policy might well have hastened the changing policy of how to deal with preventing famines in China. If the CCP had some political opposition, there would have been some motivation to get more done early to avert famines in China.