The pro-nuclear lobby will never accept any alternative that carries the "sustainable" or "renewable" tag.
They have much in common with the climate change denial lobby, in that they will never admit that they were wrong, even when the cost of ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS - by the way - has been dropped on the table, just as an initial set-up cost, let alone the 15 to 20 years time-frame before the first spark.
We also have a lot of "not in my backyard" determination - from state governments, to shire councils, to homeowners, regarding not just on plant sites, but who has a vacant basement they wouldn't mind letting out in 100,000-year increments. to store nuclear waste ?
You might well say "Dutton's dreaming" ?
I STILL say he's dog-whistlin' the anti-sustainables and climate change denial lobbies, so why bother with, so-called "costings" ?
This
'dodo policy'
already dead in the water
.