freediver wrote on Jun 28
th, 2024 at 8:42pm:
They do not want to put the tax on cows because of the CO2 they breath out. It is because of the methane they produce.
Yes petal That's what numpty's do.
freediver wrote on Jun 28
th, 2024 at 8:42pm:
I realise you are a coalition cheerleader, but you could at least make some effort to get your facts straight.
I gave you the facts. Perhaps you could write a dissertation, with references, showing me I am wrong.
Here is a sampler for you -
"Models of the global carbon cycle typically include plants, microbes,
soil, and the atmosphere. But they may be leaving out an important
variable: Animals, from earthworms to elephants, can have a significant, though heretofore little-studied, influence on how carbon is captured and stored in ecosystems.
A new theoretical framework, published in the Journal of Geophysical
Research: Biogeosciences by Matteo Rizzuto and colleagues, offers a road map for including animals in carbon cycle models. Their work shows that adding both herbivores and predators to such models significantly alters both the amount and the dynamics of carbon cycling.
Future modeling of carbon dynamics, important for understanding
climate change and designing nature-based carbon sequestration
projects, should take animals into consideration as well, researchers
argue.
Animals affect carbon cycling directly by eating plants or by eating other animals that eat plants. By producing waste, respiring, and even trampling leaves on the forest floor, they also indirectly speed up the rate at which nutrients—including carbon—are recycled. Overall, the authors found, on average,
a twofold increase in ecosystem carbon sequestration when animals were included in their carbon cycle model.By pairing an ecosystem compartment model (which considers plant,
animal, and soil microbial trophic compartments) with a traditional
1/3 carbon modeling approach, the authors found noteworthy increases in both primary productivity (i.e., plant growth) and carbon sequestration, as well as changes to carbon cycle dynamics, when animals are included in carbon models.
Importantly, these effects can be complex and are mediated by feedback loops that are still not completely understood. For example, a scenario that includes herbivores but not predators showed the highest levels of carbon sequestration. Adding in predators decreased overall carbon sequestration, though it remained higher than a scenario with no animals.".
https://phys.org/news/2024-04-animals-global-carbon.pdf"When all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail."
Forum
Pages: 1 
