Greggy:
https://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/wp_religiousdebates"Religious" debatesNote: this section DOES NOT exclusively refer to debates about religion.
"Religious" debates are so called because they have a lot in common with (but are not necessarily) discussions of religion and politics. These consist largely of people expressing strongly held personal beliefs about things that can't be proven — supposedly in the interest of agreeing on the best way to do something important, whether it's attaining eternal peace, governing effectively, imposing morality upon others, or determining which gaming console is superior.
And, like most such debates, they rarely result in anyone involved changing their point of view. Aside from being unproductive and ultimately pointless, these arguments consume inordinate amounts of moderator's efforts and erode the value of this open discussion environment.
Examples of "Religious" topics include:
Mac vs PC (vs Linux, etc)
XBox vs PlayStation (vs Wii, etc)
Android vs iOS (vs Windows Phone 7, etc) Holden vs Ford (vs Toyota, etc)
Auto vs Manual transmissions
Atheism vs Agnosticism vs Religion
Evolution denialism
Climate change denialism
Automotive – ICE vs EV
Threads which seek to unproductively perpetuate any of these debates will be closed or removed.
Before you complain about a thread being closed or deleted due to a 'Religious Debate' ruling, its probably worth your time reading and understanding this excellent article from youarenotsosmart on how marketing companies manipulate us.