Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jul 22
nd, 2024 at 5:21pm:
A person who retaliates to being called stupid names himself when trying to discuss things reasonably. You could try it some time, girlie.
When you are disrespectful, you're met with disrespect. If you don't like it, be better, pumpkin.
Quote:Now when we get all the real issues sorted out and everyone is on the same page of accepting that facts and realities are not 'racist' etc - we might be able to move forward... but jeez - aren't you lot each individually bogged down? Take a look at yourself - on and on and never accept anything - you DO have 'issues', don't you?
Which of these are you prepared to say are not true and/or are racist?
Valid Belief 1:- The NT Coroner stated that between 2000 and 2024, 76 out of 81 deaths of women in relationship situations were in Aboriginal communities. That's nearly 95% from around 30% of the total population.
Valid Belief 2:- Aboriginal children are at far greater risk than any other group in Australia.... somewhere around 40%. Proof:-
https://www.indigenoushpf.gov.au/measures/2-12-child-protection
“Over the period from 2017–18 to 2021–22, there was no clear trend in the rate of substantiated maltreatments among First Nations children (aged under 18), with rates ranged between 38.7 per 1,000 children in 2017–18 to 39.8 per 1,000 children in 2021–22.”
Valid Belief 3:- Aboriginal women are far more likely to be victims of violence.
https://nit.com.au/30-04-2024/11126/murder-of-indigenous-women-a-national-crisis
...
"the homicide rate for Indigenous women was 3.07 per 100,000 people, compared to 0.45 for non-Indigenous women."
https://www.indigenoushpf.gov.au/measures/2-10-community-safety
"Rates of hospitalisation for Indigenous Australians due to assault in Remote and Very remote areas were 23 and 21 times as high as for non-Indigenous Australians living in the same regions"
" Indigenous females were 27 times as likely as non‑Indigenous females to have been hospitalised due to assault nationally"
You constantly pointing those out alone is not racist.
That's just dealing with facts.
That is a good thing.
What comes next is what is important.
But that has no bearing on the language you choose to use, very much deliberately, (hint: the racial slurs) and the things you advocate for, repeat ad nauseam and then pretend were just jokes when they're collected and reposted.
That rich tapestry of well-documented incidents is the factual basis behind your classification as being racist.
You act like you want a good-faith discussion about Indigenous issues when you've literally stated you would have preferred the British wiped them all out on invasion pretty much invalidates any pantomime good faith you pretend to display.
But when those are foolish enough like I have to extend the olive branch, reach out across the aisle and engage with you in good faith, you just dismiss it in preference of restating the problem.
That's all you care about. It's not helping them, it's highlighting negative stories and statistics about them.
If you don't even want to help them, then what's the point?
You share no compassion for the victims of these crimes. You only cite them because they're useful to your cause.
You offer no solutions yourself, other than genocide or segregation.
It's clear, and documented, what motivates you on the topic.
There is no amount of slithering that can save you here.
And then you have the audacity to cry over being called sport and champ, expecting a better calibre of discussion than you're willing to engage in yourself?
You're a f
ucking
disgrace.