Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 58
Send Topic Print
Kamala Harris (Read 15488 times)
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104507
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #210 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:46pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:44pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:35pm:
The Deep State runs America - all those 3 letter agencies:


FBI,




So, can we believe anything the FBI tells us?




We can't until Trump kicks the boss out then purges the place
of Democrat stooges and communists.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104507
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #211 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:46pm
 

The Deep State runs America - all those 3 letter agencies:

CIA,
FBI,
DOJ,
NRO,
NSA,
DOD,
DHS,
DEA,
CID.

Trump will put his own men in charge of them.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95686
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #212 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:56pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 3:50pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:45pm:
aquascoot wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:20pm:
Laugh till you cry wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:01pm:
Donald Trump is frightened and unhorsed because his tactics were based on Joe Biden and he has no strategy to deal with an intellectual who speaks well and is understood.

Kamala Harris could defeat Trump if there are no November surprises that affect her.

She is more effective at speaking than Obama was because Obama blathered lofty ideals that he had no intention of fulfilling. Kamala Harris is not creating excessive expectations other than defeating Trump.

Genocide Joe Biden was an idiot stooge of the deep state.



somewhat true.

people misunderstand what trump wants , though its fairly obvious.

trump just wants attention and notoriety.

in that , i have to admire him as an absolute winner.


Just so. Just as you admire the Kardashians, Meghan Markle, Boy George and other professional attention seekers and butthurt victims. 

You've always been consistent on this. Forget all the hardworking stiffs working the land, you said, what would they know? We need noble celebrity attention seekers. Professional gamers, YouTubers and reality TV contestants - far superior to the weak, working chodes, who basically live lives of pure garbage.

How do we know?

You said.


workimg chodes who love their work, go home feeling that their work 'energises' them.
who are so grateful to live in a modern society full of so much opportunity......these chodes i admire.

but thats not what i see

i see people who dont understand the difference between "could" and "would'

could they start a business, work with passion, take a risk, put themselves out there, try to contribute, control their emotional state, power through adversity ?

they could because what one man can do , any man can do.


but they are never ever ever going to do it

there is zero chance someone like whiteknight is going to start a business.

so in fact , we might say he couldnt

though he could, in fact, his mindset (the prevailing mindset of the masses) means he couldnt.

could you and gweg get off trump addiction, learn a new skill, start an online business, contribute more then sarcasm to the world?

you could

but you are never ever ever going to do it

so, in effect, you couldnt

it is those chodes who need a boot up the ass.

thats the vast majority of people

as to boy george, megan markel, donald trump, kim kardashian...i am a huge fan

the chode hates them because they took action and the chode didnt

its 100 % pure envy and low evil dense stifled clenched tight mean spirited ego defence on the part of the chode


They could, or they could follow the example of the big fella, your on-and-off-again DL. They could inherit a business, party with passion, take a risk and blow it all.

They could put themselves out there, using the brand to promote universities and charitable foundations, and have them closed down for fraud.

They could try to contribute to the national discourse during a weekly spot on Fox News, where they enter politics by telling lies about the president's birthplace. They could then start a political movement based on not controlling their emotional state, binge-tweeting rage and blurting out lies.

They could seek power, not because they have any interest in power, but to extend their personal brand - a brand built on kitsch, bling, excess wealth and the sheer lack of adversity. Limousines, penthouses, private jets, all of it passed down by dad.

The chodes don't hate celebrities like the Sussexes, Kardashians and Trumps because they're rich, if they think about them at all. These are celebrities who exist as an end in themselves, celebrity for celebrity's sake. None of these people have done anything worth being a celebrity for. Few would have ever had a job, outside their own pursuit of celebrity.

Harry and Meghan - royals. Kardashians - "reality" TV. The Trumps - daddy's money. Lifestyles of the rich and famous.

It's not jealousy to point this out, dear, nor is it TDS to have a political opinion. You know all this yourself. You switched to Ron when you saw what your former DL was like. He should be nowhere near power ever again, you said. Bloated, obese, self-obsessed, only out for himself.

So I'm curious. If the Superior Man bounces out of bed with a plan, why don't you? Why do you shift the narrative everytime the truth comes out? Why do you flit and flee from your own arguments, only to go back and regurgitate them anew?

Why must the Superior Man lie?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:01pm by Karnal »  
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137339
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #213 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:03pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:46pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:44pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:35pm:
The Deep State runs America - all those 3 letter agencies:


FBI,




So, can we believe anything the FBI tells us?




We can't until Trump kicks the boss out then purges the place
of Democrat stooges and communists.



Okay.

I'll consider this as fake news then:

"What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject's rifle," the FBI's Office of Public Affairs said in a statement provided to CBS News.

Thanks Bobby.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104507
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #214 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:08pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:03pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:46pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:44pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:35pm:
The Deep State runs America - all those 3 letter agencies:


FBI,




So, can we believe anything the FBI tells us?




We can't until Trump kicks the boss out then purges the place
of Democrat stooges and communists.



Okay.

I'll consider this as fake news then:

"What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject's rifle," the FBI's Office of Public Affairs said in a statement provided to CBS News.

Thanks Bobby.



They're on Don's side now - they all fear for their jobs as the purges draw near.  Grin

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34658
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #215 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:10pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:56pm:
aquascoot wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 3:50pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:45pm:
aquascoot wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:20pm:
Laugh till you cry wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:01pm:
Donald Trump is frightened and unhorsed because his tactics were based on Joe Biden and he has no strategy to deal with an intellectual who speaks well and is understood.

Kamala Harris could defeat Trump if there are no November surprises that affect her.

She is more effective at speaking than Obama was because Obama blathered lofty ideals that he had no intention of fulfilling. Kamala Harris is not creating excessive expectations other than defeating Trump.

Genocide Joe Biden was an idiot stooge of the deep state.



somewhat true.

people misunderstand what trump wants , though its fairly obvious.

trump just wants attention and notoriety.

in that , i have to admire him as an absolute winner.


Just so. Just as you admire the Kardashians, Meghan Markle, Boy George and other professional attention seekers and butthurt victims. 

You've always been consistent on this. Forget all the hardworking stiffs working the land, you said, what would they know? We need noble celebrity attention seekers. Professional gamers, YouTubers and reality TV contestants - far superior to the weak, working chodes, who basically live lives of pure garbage.

How do we know?

You said.


workimg chodes who love their work, go home feeling that their work 'energises' them.
who are so grateful to live in a modern society full of so much opportunity......these chodes i admire.

but thats not what i see

i see people who dont understand the difference between "could" and "would'

could they start a business, work with passion, take a risk, put themselves out there, try to contribute, control their emotional state, power through adversity ?

they could because what one man can do , any man can do.


but they are never ever ever going to do it

there is zero chance someone like whiteknight is going to start a business.

so in fact , we might say he couldnt

though he could, in fact, his mindset (the prevailing mindset of the masses) means he couldnt.

could you and gweg get off trump addiction, learn a new skill, start an online business, contribute more then sarcasm to the world?

you could

but you are never ever ever going to do it

so, in effect, you couldnt

it is those chodes who need a boot up the ass.

thats the vast majority of people

as to boy george, megan markel, donald trump, kim kardashian...i am a huge fan

the chode hates them because they took action and the chode didnt

its 100 % pure envy and low evil dense stifled clenched tight mean spirited ego defence on the part of the chode


They could, or they could follow the example of the big fella, your on-and-off-again DL. They could inherit a business, party with passion, take a risk and blow it all.

They could put themselves out there, using the brand to promote universities and charitable foundations, and have them closed down for fraud.

They could try to contribute to the national discourse during a weekly spot on Fox News, where they enter politics by telling lies about the president's birthplace. They could then start a political movement based on not controlling their emotional state, binge-tweeting rage and blurting out lies.

They could seek power, not because they have any interest in power, but to extend their personal brand - a brand built on kitsch, bling, excess wealth and the sheer lack of adversity. Limousines, penthouses, private jets, all of it passed down by dad.

The chodes don't hate celebrities like the Sussexes, Kardashians and Trumps because they're rich, if they think about them at all. These are celebrities who exist as an end in themselves, celebrity for celebrity's sake. None of these people have done anything worth being a celebrity for. Few would have ever had a job, outside their own pursuit of celebrity.

Harry and Meghan - royals. Kardashians - "reality" TV. The Trumps - daddy's money. Lifestyles of the rich and famous.

It's not jealousy to point this out, dear, nor is it TDS to have a political opinion. You know all this yourself. You switched to Ron when you saw what your former DL was like. He should be nowhere near power ever again, you said. Bloated, obese, self-obsessed, only out for himself.

So I'm curious. If the Superior Man bounces out of bed with a plan, why don't you? Why do you shift the narrative everytime the truth comes out? Why do you flit and flee from your own arguments, only to go back and regurgitate them anew?

Why must the Superior Man lie?



are you seriously saying that you take more risks and live a more "out there , wild, spirited and crazy life " then donny


Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


your biggest risk is a sore finger from typing  Cry Cry Cry Cry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137339
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #216 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:16pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:08pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:03pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:46pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:44pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:35pm:
The Deep State runs America - all those 3 letter agencies:


FBI,




So, can we believe anything the FBI tells us?




We can't until Trump kicks the boss out then purges the place
of Democrat stooges and communists.



Okay.

I'll consider this as fake news then:

"What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject's rifle," the FBI's Office of Public Affairs said in a statement provided to CBS News.

Thanks Bobby.



They're on Don's side now - they all fear for their jobs as the purges draw near.  Grin



Oh, I see.

So, just to clarify: can we believe anything the FBI tells us?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95686
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #217 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:17pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:35pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:00pm:
Let's see. Mr Trump offered to outsource America's energy policy to global oil corporations in return for a bil in cash. He promised Wall Street he'll cut corporate tax, telling 80 of the biggest CEOs in a meeting in June that he planned to work for them. He's offered the crypto industry - the biggest money launderer in the world - to be "the crypto president", slashing government curbs on the sector and receiving a bil in Bitcoin from one donor alone.

So I'm curious. If your DL wanted to go after the Deep State, why would he be doing deals with its key protagonists?

The big fella's promising to cut the corporate tax rate, but do you know? His own administration's income tax cuts expire in 2025. That's an exchange of cash from ordinary income-earners straight to the globalists: one single transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich, orchestrated by you-know-who.

Think on it, Bobby. You used to decry the influence of money in politics. The politicians are all owned by the globalists, you said. Bush can't do anything without a nod from Chevron and Texaco. Oba-ma's owned by Silicon Valley. Do you know? You said. They're all as bad as each other.

Your DL is now going above and beyond. He's offering to let the globalists write their own legislation and stack his administration with their own employees. By lowering their taxes, income eaters will be paying their salaries.

So I'm curious. Now that you know all this, how do you think your DL will drain that swamp?

Up for an answer?





I've told you before.

The Deep State runs America - all those 3 letter agencies:

CIA,
FBI,
DOJ,
NRO,
NSA,
DOD,
DHS,
DEA,
CID.

Trump will put his own men in charge of them.


I see. So by draining the swamp, you just mean appointing the directors of the security agencies, do you? Is that what you mean?

That's a relief. The appointments are being sorted as we speak, dear. Only they won't be appointed by Mr Trump. Here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

Once the Heritage Foundation has its way with the three-letter agencies, the big fella will need to stack his cabinet with the fossil fuel and tech CEOs, the big Hedge Funds, Wall Street and crypto lobbyists.

That's the deal. By the time the big fella gets in, he'll have no say at all. As Aquascoot says, he'll be free to go play golf and bang some hot babe filly.

Unfortunately, Melania's put him in the dog house.

DRAIN THE SWAMP !!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95686
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #218 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:26pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:10pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:56pm:
aquascoot wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 3:50pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:45pm:
aquascoot wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:20pm:
Laugh till you cry wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 2:01pm:
Donald Trump is frightened and unhorsed because his tactics were based on Joe Biden and he has no strategy to deal with an intellectual who speaks well and is understood.

Kamala Harris could defeat Trump if there are no November surprises that affect her.

She is more effective at speaking than Obama was because Obama blathered lofty ideals that he had no intention of fulfilling. Kamala Harris is not creating excessive expectations other than defeating Trump.

Genocide Joe Biden was an idiot stooge of the deep state.



somewhat true.

people misunderstand what trump wants , though its fairly obvious.

trump just wants attention and notoriety.

in that , i have to admire him as an absolute winner.


Just so. Just as you admire the Kardashians, Meghan Markle, Boy George and other professional attention seekers and butthurt victims. 

You've always been consistent on this. Forget all the hardworking stiffs working the land, you said, what would they know? We need noble celebrity attention seekers. Professional gamers, YouTubers and reality TV contestants - far superior to the weak, working chodes, who basically live lives of pure garbage.

How do we know?

You said.


workimg chodes who love their work, go home feeling that their work 'energises' them.
who are so grateful to live in a modern society full of so much opportunity......these chodes i admire.

but thats not what i see

i see people who dont understand the difference between "could" and "would'

could they start a business, work with passion, take a risk, put themselves out there, try to contribute, control their emotional state, power through adversity ?

they could because what one man can do , any man can do.


but they are never ever ever going to do it

there is zero chance someone like whiteknight is going to start a business.

so in fact , we might say he couldnt

though he could, in fact, his mindset (the prevailing mindset of the masses) means he couldnt.

could you and gweg get off trump addiction, learn a new skill, start an online business, contribute more then sarcasm to the world?

you could

but you are never ever ever going to do it

so, in effect, you couldnt

it is those chodes who need a boot up the ass.

thats the vast majority of people

as to boy george, megan markel, donald trump, kim kardashian...i am a huge fan

the chode hates them because they took action and the chode didnt


They could, or they could follow the example of the big fella, your on-and-off-again DL. They could inherit a business, party with passion, take a risk and blow it all.

They could put themselves out there, using the brand to promote universities and charitable foundations, and have them closed down for fraud.

They could try to contribute to the national discourse during a weekly spot on Fox News, where they enter politics by telling lies about the president's birthplace. They could then start a political movement based on not controlling their emotional state, binge-tweeting rage and blurting out lies.

They could seek power, not because they have any interest in power, but to extend their personal brand - a brand built on kitsch, bling, excess wealth and the sheer lack of adversity. Limousines, penthouses, private jets, all of it passed down by dad.

The chodes don't hate celebrities like the Sussexes, Kardashians and Trumps because they're rich, if they think about them at all. These are celebrities who exist as an end in themselves, celebrity for celebrity's sake. None of these people have done anything worth being a celebrity for. Few would have ever had a job, outside their own pursuit of celebrity.

Harry and Meghan - royals. Kardashians - "reality" TV. The Trumps - daddy's money. Lifestyles of the rich and famous.

It's not jealousy to point this out, dear, nor is it TDS to have a political opinion. You know all this yourself. You switched to Ron when you saw what your former DL was like. He should be nowhere near power ever again, you said. Bloated, obese, self-obsessed, only out for himself.

So I'm curious. If the Superior Man bounces out of bed with a plan, why don't you? Why do you shift the narrative everytime the truth comes out? Why do you flit and flee from your own arguments, only to go back and regurgitate them anew?

Why must the Superior Man lie?



are you seriously saying that you take more risks and live a more "out there , wild, spirited and crazy life " then donny


Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


your biggest risk is a sore finger from typing  Cry Cry Cry Cry


No, dear, I'm saying his entire campaign is based on evading justice and eradicating risk.

Are you seriously saying he wants to be prez? After last time?

The big fella's already said - he only wants to be dictator for a day.

Once he's in, he can say he's won, step down and take his pardons from the next prez, JD Vance.

Sure, there's a bit of risk, but it just may save him spending the rest of his life in Fort Buttner.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 104507
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #219 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:31pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:17pm:
I see. So by draining the swamp, you just mean appointing the directors of the security agencies, do you? Is that what you mean?

That's a relief. The appointments are being sorted as we speak, dear. Only they won't be appointed by Mr Trump. Here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

Once the Heritage Foundation has its way with the three-letter agencies, the big fella will need to stack his cabinet with the fossil fuel and tech CEOs, the big Hedge Funds, Wall Street and crypto lobbyists.

That's the deal. By the time the big fella gets in, he'll have no say at all. As Aquascoot says, he'll be free to go play golf and bang some hot babe filly.

Unfortunately, Melania's put him in the dog house.

DRAIN THE SWAMP !!!



Trump has a plan to drain the swamp properly this time -
that's all you need to know.

Get your popcorn ready as you enjoy a front row seat.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 137339
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #220 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 6:00pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:16pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:08pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:03pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:46pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:44pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 4:35pm:
The Deep State runs America - all those 3 letter agencies:


FBI,




So, can we believe anything the FBI tells us?




We can't until Trump kicks the boss out then purges the place
of Democrat stooges and communists.



Okay.

I'll consider this as fake news then:

"What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject's rifle," the FBI's Office of Public Affairs said in a statement provided to CBS News.

Thanks Bobby.



They're on Don's side now - they all fear for their jobs as the purges draw near.  Grin



Oh, I see.

So, just to clarify: can we believe anything the FBI tells us?


Bobby?

We need you to lock in your answer.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95686
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #221 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 6:17pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:31pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 29th, 2024 at 5:17pm:
I see. So by draining the swamp, you just mean appointing the directors of the security agencies, do you? Is that what you mean?

That's a relief. The appointments are being sorted as we speak, dear. Only they won't be appointed by Mr Trump. Here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

Once the Heritage Foundation has its way with the three-letter agencies, the big fella will need to stack his cabinet with the fossil fuel and tech CEOs, the big Hedge Funds, Wall Street and crypto lobbyists.

That's the deal. By the time the big fella gets in, he'll have no say at all. As Aquascoot says, he'll be free to go play golf and bang some hot babe filly.

Unfortunately, Melania's put him in the dog house.

DRAIN THE SWAMP !!!



Trump has a plan to drain the swamp properly this time -
that's all you need to know.

Get your popcorn ready as you enjoy a front row seat.




No no, you were asked how.

Oh, that's easy, you said. He'll replace the leaders of the three-letter agencies.

Not so, we said. The Heritage Foundation's doing that. We gave you a link. We showed how he's also done a deal with the globalists, big oil and crypto firms to put them in charge too.

Are you saying he has a different plan to the one he's said?

Are you calling your DL a liar?

A simple yes or no will suffice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Laugh till you cry
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 16619
In your happy place
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #222 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 6:52pm
 
Harris surging. Trump is eating her dust.

Is Donald Trump going to complain that the Biden switcheroo invalidated Harris's election win?

https://www.economist.com/interactive/us-2024-election/trump-harris-polls

...
Back to top
 

Please don't thank me. Effusive fawning and obeisance of disciples, mendicants, and foot-kissers embarrass me.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 46084
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #223 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 7:21pm
 
CNN Awarded Pulitzer For Outstanding Achievements In Deleting Old Stories About Kamala Harris


U.S. — The Pulitzer Committee has awarded CNN its most prestigious prize for outstanding achievements in the field of deleting stories about Kamala Harris.

"We are incredibly honored," said CNN President Mark Thompson. "Our team has worked around the clock wiping out every story in existence about Kamala from before ten days ago, and it's just really nice to see that hard work recognized."

Though several media organizations made valiant efforts to memory-hole all record of Kamala's prior existence, the Pulitzer Committee ultimately felt that CNN was a cut above. "No one else has shown such total commitment to annihilating their own previous stories about Kamala," said Committee Chair Larson Brim. "They are in there smashing servers and literally lighting their own work on fire in a glorious blaze. You can search their site and never know Kamala ever held political office before July 2024. It's inspiring."

According to sources within CNN, every journalist on staff has been temporarily assigned to full-time work destroying all record of Kamala Harris' prior existence. "The best way to defend Kamala's record is to incinerate all traces of her record," explained Thompson. "We believe so strongly in her competency that we are going to shred every piece of evidence of every job she has ever held. It's what journalism is all about."

At publishing time, CNN had been awarded another Pulitzer for its excellent work in the area of deleting stories about the Trump assassination attempt.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 46084
Gender: male
Re: Kamala Harris
Reply #224 - Jul 29th, 2024 at 7:26pm
 
Kamala Admits She Can't Remember If She Was In Charge Of Border As She Was Pretty Drunk These Last 4 Years And Honestly It’s All A Bit Hazy


U.S. — After initially denying having anything to do with the border crisis, Vice President Kamala Harris admitted today that she may not be remembering correctly as she's been really drunk the past four years straight, and it's all a bit of a fog.

"Honestly, I've been so wasted -- who knows what I did the past four years," said Harris, dumping another Tito's shooter into her tumbler. "Border czar?? Whatever you say, man."

According to sources, Harris reflexively denied all responsibility for the border catastrophe as she had no memory of having ever visited the border. "I figured if I was responsible for the border I would have gone, like, once," said Harris adding a wine cooler to her tumbler. "I guess I've been so blackout drunk for the past four years, I just don't remember. Geez, it looks like it was pretty bad, huh?"

With Biden stepping aside, the Vice President's team has been reportedly explaining to her all of the jobs she did during the past administration while she was plastered. "Yes, you really did go to Europe to try to keep Ukraine from being invaded. No, it didn't turn out well," explained aide Regina Callahan. "Do you remember talking about yellow school buses? How about outer space? Oh man, we have a lot to cover."

At publishing time, Kamala had furiously argued that if she had twice been a presidential candidate, surely one person in the nation had voted for her - before again confessing that she's been heavily inebriated the past decade and it's possible she could be slightly off.





Flakey effin' bint.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 58
Send Topic Print