India ‘one of the worst autocratisers’: V-Dem report on democracy

Noting that almost all components of democracy were getting worse in more countries than they were getting better, the report singled out freedom of expression, clean elections, and freedom of association/civil society as the three worst affected components in autocratising countries

March 11, 2024 08:25 pm | Updated 09:18 pm IST - NEW DELHI

India, which was downgraded to the status of an “electoral autocracy” in 2018, has declined even further on multiple metrics to emerge as “one of the worst autocratizers”, according to the ‘Democracy Report 2024’ released by the Gothenburg-based V-Dem Institute that tracks democratic freedoms worldwide.

The V-Dem report categorises countries into four regime types based on their score in the Liberal Democratic Index (LDI): Liberal Democracy, Electoral Democracy, Electoral Autocracy, and Closed Autocracy. Their annual report, which maps each country on a matrix of whether they are turning more democratic (‘democratising’) or more autocratic (‘autocratising’), stated that in 2023, 42 countries (home to 35% of the world’s population) were undergoing autocratisation. “India, with 18% of the world’s population, accounts for about half of the population living in autocratising countries,” the report said. Democratisation was taking place only in 18 countries, accounting for just 400 million people, or 5% of the world’s population.

According to the report, 71% of the world’s population — 5.7 billion people — live in autocracies, an increase from 48% ten years ago. The level of democracy enjoyed by the “average person in the world is down to 1985-levels”, the report said, with the sharpest decline occurring in Eastern Europe, and South and Central Asia.

1. India’s democratic values have eroded significantly: V­Dem

2. Democracy in India, a gift and a warning

3. 85 per cent Indians support rule by a strong leader or military says Pew survey: Data

4. India’s democracy, diminished and declining

5. The democratic backsliding of India

Noting that almost all components of democracy were getting worse in more countries than they were getting better, the report singled out freedom of expression, clean elections, and freedom of association/civil society as the three worst affected components of democracy in autocratising countries. The autonomy of the electoral management bodies “is weakening substantially in 22 of the 42 autocratising countries,” the report said.

South and Central Asia regressed significantly, with the level of “liberal democracy” enjoyed by the average Indian now “down to levels last seen in 1975….when Indira Gandhi declared a state of emergency in India”. As per the V-Dem classification, a liberal democracy is one where, in addition to the requirements of electoral democracy such as regular free and fair elections, mechanisms for judicial independence and constraints on executive overreach are robust, alongside rigorous protection of civil liberties and equality before law. In an electoral autocracy — the category India falls into — multiparty elections coexist with insufficient levels of basic requisites such as freedom of expression and free and fair elections.

Noting that India’s “autocratisation process has been well documented, including gradual but substantial deterioration of freedom of expression, compromising independence of the media, crackdowns on social media, harassments of journalists critical of the government, as well as attacks on civil society,” the report detailed how the “anti-pluralist” BJP government has “used laws on sedition, defamation, and counterterrorism to silence critics”.

“The Modi-led government also continues to suppress the freedom of religion rights. Intimidation of political opponents and people protesting government policies, as well as silencing of dissent in academia are now prevalent,” the report noted, adding that the only liberal democracy in the whole of South and Central Asia was Bhutan.

In a separate section on the 60 countries that go to the polls in 2024, the report observed that more than half of these (31) were in periods of democratic decline. Noting that elections on autocratising countries are “critical events” that can “either trigger democratisation, enable autocratisation, or aid stabilisation of autocratic regimes”, the report stated that “a majority” of elections in 2024 would be in highly contested spaces, making 2024 a critical year for the “future of democracy in the world”.

As for social stability, not mentioned in the "democracy" index: China compares more favourably than the US....

I think India can find her own footing in the world in the coming decade.   Yes, there are many challenges, but thats like every other country in the world, we all have our own challenges.

India and China were long past their economically world-leading days when modern liberal democracy was born.

We know India isn't a 'liberal' democracy; and neither is China, yet the latter has eradicated poverty at the fastest rate in history by introducing a mixed socialist command (public)/market (private) economy, NOT a democracy (unlike India which has struggled to escape mass poverty)

See above. The CCP has more support in China than Dem or Repub government in the US.

Quote:


When were either of them a world leader?

Both have reaped great benefits from democracy and liberalisation. Both still have a long way to go, just to copy what has been done elsewhere. The rapid improvement in China (until the latest round of reforms put the handbrake on) reflects the rapid transition. Just more evidence of democracy and liberalisation as the cause of wealth.

'Liberal' is a relative term, just as 'wealthy' is also relative. Only those who seek to deceive try to turn it into a binary.

Or else.