Tim Walz is the guy to do it, leftards. Just tell it like it is.

Crime was up, employment down, terrorism up, life expectancy down, imports up, manufacturing down, border crime up, deportations down, up and down and on and on it goes.

In nearly every measure, DL failed. Americans don't want to return to those times.They want to get ahead. They want the same health care, social welfare, employment benefits and standards of living we have. For a rich country like America, I don't think that's too much to ask.

If Karmala can't say that, Walz can. He faces an Establishment opponent that wants to raise the important issue of trannies and boys' toilets.

Nice work if you can get it, eh?

https://www.nytimes.com/article/george-floyd-protests-timeline.html

yes gordon

as mothra admitted herself

jan 6 did 1.2 million dollars damage

and BLM did about 2 billion

thats only 1500 x more 

philperth2010 wrote on Aug 8^th, 2024 at 12:26pm:



they are all corrupt phil

heres a stat for you

kamala harris raised more money from political donors (read lobbyists) in the first 8 hours of her nomination, then was raised by every politician in the UK before the last election and the cost of running that election

the numbers are huge.

and if trump is getting it from eqypt, that probably doesnt produce corruption at home

but if kamala is getting it from raytheon, lockhead martin, big pharma and big food, from big tech
then thats a lot of favors that have to be paid back

trump is not the sort of guy to "bend the knee"
he is a loose cannon
if you are a lobbyist, you want harris
in fact the only person better then harris was biden which is why they were trying to get him back in
then they could have run amok


but mark my words

harris is going to be a warmonger because the lobbyists demand it and she will want to be seen as a strong fierce woman

trumps 10 mill is peanuts
its probably one bomb load from one of the fighters harris will deploy (as had every president since bush 1)
its why the country is 35 trillion in debt

Given how progressive many of the initial Biden administration domestic policy actions have been, its foreign policy seems incongruous to some. This apparent contradiction becomes easier to understand by recognizing the critical role played by the military-industrial complex (MIC) in shaping foreign policy.

Many commentators have pointed out that Biden’s foreign policy appointments come from the Obama administration, and reflect a Democratic old guard. This group was intimately tied to the MIC and there is little evidence that these ties have been severed. Secretary of State Antony Blinken was deputy secretary and national security adviser under Obama, a supporter of the Iraq War and a China hardliner. After Obama, he led a firm that consulted with top military contractors, with his associate Michèle Flournoy, board member of top nuclear weapons firm Booz Allen Hamilton. CIA Director Avril Haines was Obama’s deputy national security adviser and former CIA deputy director.


Sales to foreign governments require State Department approval, and the primary buyer for most major weapons systems is the U.S. government. For most of the increasingly expensive modernized nuclear weapons, such as the new intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), the U.S. government is the only buyer. To justify spending the enormous amount of taxpayer dollars on weapons contracts, the MIC contractors require major foreign “enemies.” It’s quite irrelevant who they are — Russia, China, Iran, North Korea can all be claimed as imminent dangers, and work equally well to argue that more weapons are needed, and more tax dollars must be invested in the Pentagon to maintain “national security.”

The “war on terror” was adequate to maintain Pentagon spending after 9/11. However, to justify enormously expensive new nuclear weapons, such as the $100 billion new ICBMS, “terrorists” aren’t a strong enough card to play. So, the MIC now pivots back to old Cold War propaganda, claiming that the U.S. is endangered on all sides.

For nuclear weapons manufacturers, profitability simply requires that the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources continue to vote for hundreds of billions of dollars for weapons contracts. According to the Congressional Budget Office, one-third of the Department of Defense’s budget ($244 billion) is used to procure new systems, upgrade existing systems and perform research, development, testing and evaluation of new systems. Adding $20 billion a year spent on nuclear weapons by Department of Energy contractors, we estimate $264 billion of the $760 billion National Defense Authorization Act and Department of Energy budgets is going toward weapons development and manufacture.

philperth2010 wrote on Aug 8^th, 2024 at 12:59pm:



not me , sunshine

find  a post saying that and i'll leave forever

and i am an honourable person (unlike some) 

Gordon wrote on Aug 8^th, 2024 at 12:17pm:


Hard to say, Gordon. Being an old sports coach, do you think he takes boys down the oval to pash the Boongs?

I believe they call their Boongs Injuns.

I do hope they're checking them for vaginas, dear. We wouldn't want any trannies slipping through, now would we?

JD is campaigning on this very issue in the erection. He's APPALLED.

You?